Furiounova
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2012
- Messages
- 4,237
- Reaction score
- 552
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
They are consistent.
Okay. I didn't expect you to honestly address the facts in the OP anyways.
They are consistent.
Stop asking ridiculous questions and pay attention to that which has been said about the op.Apparently it is against the rules to accuse people of being socks so you seek ways to skirt the rules. hilarious
any chance you will address the OP?
But they are consistent.Okay. I didn't expect you to honestly address the facts in the OP anyways.
There's not much to elaborate on. You claimed X, the facts prove Y:Can you elaborate? not sure what you are asking.
You're saying that Mr. Zimmerman had not called the cops at all. That is a lie. Mr. Zimmerman had already called the cops, and here's the call, listen for yourself:12. Claims he told a witness after the gunshot he had already called the cops. (witness states he asked for the cops to be called)
There's not much to elaborate on. You claimed X, the facts prove Y:
You're saying that Mr. Zimmerman had not called the cops at all. That is a lie. Mr. Zimmerman had already called the cops, and here's the call, listen for yourself:
Your thread about irregularities, has irregularities.
I find it peculiar that he starts his narrative in August 2011. Not saying I know what that means or that it has any meaning.
But merely that it seem pretty weird to me to start your story of events of February with details of some other event that happened 6 months ago.
:shrug:
I think that point of that one is the discrepancy between George Saying to call the cops and George saying not to call the cops, not about whether George had already called the cops rather than an assertion tha GZ didn't call the cops.You're saying Mr. Zimmerman did NOT call the non-emergency number to report a suspicious person before he and no_limit_nigga were even close to eachother.
I mean, we've had threads and threads all about the call. Why are you ignoring it?
You are missing the point. In his statement he claims he told someone he had already called the cops but at least one witness stated GZ asked for the cops to be called.
...and that's why we use "no_limit_nigga"...they wana play silly games, we can play some silly mother****ing games.I find it peculiar that he starts his narrative in August 2011. Not saying I know what that means or that it has any meaning.
But merely that it seem pretty weird to me to start your story of events of February with details of some other event that happened 6 months ago.
:shrug:
And we know what all the evidence adds up to.
Serino said his investigation turned up no reliable evidence that cast doubt on Zimmerman's account – that he had acted in self-defense.
"The best evidence we have is the testimony of George Zimmerman, and he says the decedent was the primary aggressor in the whole event," Serino told the Sentinel March 16. "Everything I have is adding up to what he says."
Which is something that all the Traybots refuse to admit.
We do know what the evidence says in toto.
So this crap that you are bringing up does not cast doubt on Zimmerman's account.
And some people just can't see that.
You know that, like our President, Mr. Zimmerman is black, don't you?He was trying to conceal how he racially profiled TM and this is also the reason he said he couldn't give dispatch a description of of the "suspect."
Serino highlighted how he called the cops on only blacks from the time he moved there in 2009.
...and that's why we use "no_limit_nigga"...they wana play silly games, we can play some silly mother****ing games.
You know that, like our President, Mr. Zimmerman is black, don't you?
You put your foot in your mouth every time you even hint at racial profiling. It's absurd.
He was trying to conceal how he racially profiled TM and this is also the reason he said he couldn't give dispatch a description of of the "suspect."
Serino highlighted how he called the cops on only blacks from the time he moved there in 2009.
...and that's why we use "no_limit_nigga"...they wana play silly games, we can play some silly mother****ing games.
More desperate race baiting. When all else fails, cry "RACISM!"
It turned out that GZ was exactly accurate about TM. In fact, GZ understated it. TM was an asshole and f...ing punk, and there was many things not right about TM.
Of course, YOU say the reason TM was a violent, criminal, ignorant bully because he was African-American - but then that is just more racism on your part. Everyone who fixates on the race of TM is a racist. Your doing so is your deeply rooted racism.
More desperate race baiting. When all else fails, cry "RACISM!"....
I am sure that's all connected in some way in your head. But from outside, the connections not all that clear....and that's why we use "no_limit_nigga"...they wana play silly games, we can play some silly mother****ing games.
Is he also the guy who recommended that charges brought? Is he the same Serino?What Serino said is that all evidence supports GZ's claim and there is no basis for a prosecution.
I think they do it mostly to bait other posters.some folks use the term "nolimitnigga" because its a passive-aggresive way of calling Trayvon Martin and other black people "nigger".
More desperate race baiting. When all else fails, cry "RACISM!"
It turned out that GZ was exactly accurate about TM. In fact, GZ understated it. TM was an asshole and f...ing punk, and there was many things not right about TM.
Of course, YOU say the reason TM was a violent, criminal, ignorant bully because he was African-American - but then that is just more racism on your part. Everyone who fixates on the race of TM is a racist. Your doing so is your deeply rooted racism.
Why are so many Trayvon Martin advocates such intense racists? I guess that is because TM was a racist himself.