• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Wow this is stunning!!!!!! [W:188]

For reporting on anything and everything that might possibly look bad for the president regardless of whether it had any evidence at all?

Amazing.


Since when do we need evidence?
 
When Fox News stops it's 24 hour Benghazi fabrication stories and replaces them with Rev Wright and Obama's grandma conspired and orchestrated the attack in Benghazi.
There was a time when I believed you might be serious.

That was a while ago.
 
So you want President Biden, and are making excuses for Nixon.

If it walks like a knee-jerker, and talks like a knee jerker....

How do you interpret anything I said as a defense of Nixon??

I want both Obama AND Biden impeached. Hello President Boehner.

Hopefully, Romney will win and we can just relegate these two to the ash bin of history and try to forget the nightmare. I would not want to impeach a defeated POTUS, but I think they should make it clear that if he starts creating trouble by trying to rewrite history, that impeachment could be imposed. Hope he just goes back to Hawaii and reflects on the horrible president he was.
 
People die, especially in the military and especially in Muslim countries. It's tragic, but it's a fact.

Especially when the administration puts their safety at a low priority compared to the absolute need to keep Muslims feeling good about themselves.

And especially when the administration refuses to give them the security protection they begged for in the weeks prior to the attack.

And especially when during the attack, the administration told the military/CIA units to 'stand down' that were trained, for and ready to go, for situation just like this because there was an election coming down the pike where the administration had already established "Osama is dead and Al Qaeda is irrelevant" meme.

Yeah - places like this are dangerous - especially in Muslim countries - and especially when the administration that sends them there abandon them for the higher ideals of winning an election.
 
The fact is that they didn't save any American lives. 3,000 died under Bush and 200 died under Reagan.

They didn't cover it up.
 
The nice thing about the election is that whoever wins, the empty headed Bengazhi meme will be abandoned by the Tea Party Occupation Forces, since its sole purpose is agitprop.
 
Especially when the administration puts their safety at a low priority compared to the absolute need to keep Muslims feeling good about themselves.

And especially when the administration refuses to give them the security protection they begged for in the weeks prior to the attack.

And especially when during the attack, the administration told the military/CIA units to 'stand down' that were trained, for and ready to go, for situation just like this because there was an election coming down the pike where the administration had already established "Osama is dead and Al Qaeda is irrelevant" meme.

Yeah - places like this are dangerous - especially in Muslim countries - and especially when the administration that sends them there abandon them for the higher ideals of winning an election.

This is what the Obamanation said about Sandy.

This is a tough time for a lot of people, millions of folks all across the eastern seaboard, but America is tougher, and we’re tougher because we pull together, and we leave nobody behind. We make sure that we respond as a nation, and remind ourselves that whenever an American is in need, all of us stand together to make sure that we’re providing the help that’s necessary.

That obviously didn't apply to the men left to die in Benghazi.

We are not going to tolerate red tape. We’re not going to tolerate bureaucracy. And I’ve instituted a 15 minute rule, essentially, on my team. You return everybody’s phone called in 15 minutes, whether it’s the mayors, the governors, county officials. If they need something, we figure out a way to say yes.

But he still can't figure out what happened almost two months ago, citing 'red tape'. The Ambassador and the three Americans who died with him didn't receive any answers to their calls. All was silent.
 
You could seriously make up anything about Benghazi and the right-wing will believe it. "This guy told me Obama watched via live video the Americans dying and cackled maniacally and shouted things in Arabic!"

You know what is far sadder? Is actually tragic?

A large swath of Democrats are unwilling to face reality.

It's dangerous when you embrace and defend this level of incompetence with the defense of our nation and those sticking their necks out for us.

What signal does this send the world? Our enemies? Though many Americans are blind or ignorant thanks to the press... our enemies are not.

Both the president and the propagandist press have proven themselves beyond vile, yet Democrats play this as a pure political issue. It is far beyond that.

Come this evening we will have a solution to half of this mess. The propagandists dressed up as journalists... they are hopeless. A write off. A menace responsible for institutionalizing mass ignorance upon the electorate.

After all... it's how Obama got elected... fortunately there are enough who know they were duped the first time around. It won't work a second time.
 
Speaking of Faux, Hannity was gnashing his teeth about Obama's Katrina last night. Appears there was a rape in a stairwell???He was trying to make it sound like the aftermath of Katrina. Fox is a sad joke, and the worst part is people believe it.
 
If you were president and some other nation attacked us, what would you do?

I certainly WOULDN'T manipulate fears and use it as justification to attack a different country that wasn't involved in attacking us....thats for damn sure.
 
I certainly WOULDN'T manipulate fears and use it as justification to attack a different country that wasn't involved in attacking us....thats for damn sure.

So you would have stood up to Hillary Clinton and all the other DEMs who were frothing at the mouth and wishing this 'had happened while Clinton was president' so that HE could have been a 'war time' president.

Did you voice anguish at the overwhelming majority of DEMs who voted WITH Bush on the approval of the Iraq war?

You do know, don't you, that this is all revisionist history that you are spewing. What happened was that Bush was overwhelmingly popular for the way he was handling the terrorist attacks and the prosecution of the wars.

DEMs saw that as a threat to their future electability. Unless they could demonize Bush, it would be hard to elect DEMs in the future. They had to put an end to this groundswell of support.

So they began to foment a strategy that would just ignore their own history of support and begin calling Bush a LIAR. This strategy would have been slapped down immediately and laughed out of the room if it were not for the lap-dog media whose only mission these days is to act as house-organ for anything the DNC wants them to do.

Unbelievable mendacity in a normal world.

But totally expected mendacity in this bizzaro world we live in today.
 
So you would have stood up to Hillary Clinton and all the other DEMs who were frothing at the mouth and wishing this 'had happened while Clinton was president' so that HE could have been a 'war time' president.

Did you voice anguish at the overwhelming majority of DEMs who voted WITH Bush on the approval of the Iraq war?

You do know, don't you, that this is all revisionist history that you are spewing. What happened was that Bush was overwhelmingly popular for the way he was handling the terrorist attacks and the prosecution of the wars.

DEMs saw that as a threat to their future electability. Unless they could demonize Bush, it would be hard to elect DEMs in the future. They had to put an end to this groundswell of support.

So they began to foment a strategy that would just ignore their own history of support and begin calling Bush a LIAR. This strategy would have been slapped down immediately and laughed out of the room if it were not for the lap-dog media whose only mission these days is to act as house-organ for anything the DNC wants them to do.

Unbelievable mendacity in a normal world.

But totally expected mendacity in this bizzaro world we live in today.
Yes I would have stood up to them......I have no use for spineless democrats any more than I have use for brainless Republicans.

The reality is, Rumsfield and Cheney had an agenda that they had tried to pursue for at least 2 decades. It wasn't until they got a bumbling idiot in the whitehouse that they are able to convince him to invade Iraq....even H.W. Bush refused their agenda.
 
I predict that not only will President Obama win tomorrow, but you right-wing nuts will be still be bitching about Benghazi when it is a long forgotten event.

Benghazi will not go away no matter who wins today. It was dereliction of duty by the POTUS that caused 4 americans to lose their lives. The truth will come out and it will be much bigger than watergate or monicagate. Those two minor things caused a presidential resignation and an impeachment.

This is not over. After the election the MSM will begin to cover it----Watch.
 
Benghazi will not go away no matter who wins today. It was dereliction of duty by the POTUS that caused 4 americans to lose their lives. The truth will come out and it will be much bigger than watergate or monicagate. Those two minor things caused a presidential resignation and an impeachment.

This is not over. After the election the MSM will begin to cover it----Watch.

I would not count on the MSM covering it at all. If anything happens it will come via the House of Representatives, and those individual GOPers who do the heavy lifting will be vvilified by the media.

If Obama wins, it will take extraordinary resolve to pursue it = and it will take individuals willing to risk their careers to do it because the liberal knives will be out to cut their throats and stab them in the back.

If Obama loses, I expect there to be hearings to establish the truth and then it will be left to the history books to evaluate the culpability. History books written by left-wing history professors.

The time for the media to have done their jobs was in the last six weeks. They were AWOL and if they showed up at all on the topic it was to lend cover to Obama - aka the town hall debate.

Out only hope for an independent media is for a new generation of journalists to be born, nurtured, and raised under a 'small r' republican form of government with a public school system that emphasizes what made America great and an attitude of self-reliance and an unwavering search for the truth.

Truth as in actual facts. Truth without dilution by 'gotcha' moments. Truth emphasizing the big picture of what is actually happening and emphasis on the whole argument rather than talking points and sound bytes.

This will take thirty years.
 
Yes I would have stood up to them......I have no use for spineless democrats any more than I have use for brainless Republicans.

The reality is, Rumsfield and Cheney had an agenda that they had tried to pursue for at least 2 decades. It wasn't until they got a bumbling idiot in the whitehouse that they are able to convince him to invade Iraq....even H.W. Bush refused their agenda.

I'd really like to know how you arrived at such a nonsense conclusion. This has to have come from complete immersion in the radical left-wing misinformation machine. There is no element of truth in any phrase you just spewed.

And to say 'I would have stood up to them' - the natural question is "well DID you stand up to them?" and if not, why not.

The only acceptable answer is that you were too young to fully understand the situation at the time - which lends credence to my first observation - that you are brainwashed by the most dispicable misinformation agency in history.
 
I'd really like to know how you arrived at such a nonsense conclusion. This has to have come from complete immersion in the radical left-wing misinformation machine. There is no element of truth in any phrase you just spewed.

And to say 'I would have stood up to them' - the natural question is "well DID you stand up to them?" and if not, why not.

The only acceptable answer is that you were too young to fully understand the situation at the time - which lends credence to my first observation - that you are brainwashed by the most dispicable misinformation agency in history.

Open a book sometime. It is fairly widely known that Rumsfield and Cheney had wanted to invade Iraq for decades.....going back to the first Bush. H.W. flat out told them no.....

Education....its really not a bad thing.
 
It IS stunning! I've lost track though. Is this the 26th or 27th Benghazi thread in the Election 2012 forum?

and have you noticed, they're all 'stunning'!? And almost all of them come from right wing blogs or the right wing media.
 
The nice thing about the election is that whoever wins, the empty headed Bengazhi meme will be abandoned by the Tea Party Occupation Forces, since its sole purpose is agitprop.
It is possible that we will not uncover the truth until we bring Pansy Panetta, H. Clinton, all of the general officers involved, Directors of NSA and CIA before a House committee, swear them in and ask them a few questions. That might not occur until after President Romney is sworn into office. It is going to be cool to have an American President again.
 
It is also about the cover up by Obama for political reasons.

Well, aside from your conspiracy mongering here... I let this old tymer reply to your assessment. He used to call himself "Voice of Reason". Don't know if you knew him or not:


First of all (Obama) has not been charged with any crime and if it happens you are innocent until proven guilty..That is the way we do it in the U.S......You must have learned that in school.......

linkypoo...
 
It IS stunning! I've lost track though. Is this the 26th or 27th Benghazi thread in the Election 2012 forum?

You have to mock it and humiliate it because you can't defend the fact Obama lied and people died

Says more about your integrity and character than anything else
 
Well, aside from your conspiracy mongering here... I let this old tymer reply to your assessment. He used to call himself "Voice of Reason". Don't know if you knew him or not:


First of all (Obama) has not been charged with any crime and if it happens you are innocent until proven guilty..That is the way we do it in the U.S......You must have learned that in school.......

linkypoo...

You mean like "Slick Willie" Clinton?:lamo
 
Yes I would have stood up to them......I have no use for spineless democrats any more than I have use for brainless Republicans.

The reality is, Rumsfield and Cheney had an agenda that they had tried to pursue for at least 2 decades. It wasn't until they got a bumbling idiot in the whitehouse that they are able to convince him to invade Iraq....even H.W. Bush refused their agenda.

You and your conspiracy theories crack me up DD.....So anyone who disagrees with you is spineless and brainless.......You never cease to amaze me.
 
You mean like "Slick Willie" Clinton?:lamo

Oh sure- make fun of him when you want. But you'll quote him when what he says or claims upholds your view against Obama.

I bet you he feels like a used condom by now.
 
http://www.therightscoop.com/report-clinton-asked-for-more-security-in-benghazi-obama-said-no/



According to Ed Klein yesterday on Wilkow, the legal counsel of Hillary Clinton told him that she had actually ordered more security in Benghazi before the attack, however Obama turned it down.
In fact he also reports that Bill Clinton wants her to release proof of this to protect herself even though it would likely cost Obama the election.



EXAMINER- Last night, it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered more security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi before it was attacked where four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens were murdered by Al-Qaeda but President Obama denied the request.

The news broke on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” hosted by Andrew Wilkow, by best-selling author, Ed Klein who said the legal counsel to Clinton had informed him of this information.

Klein also said that those same sources said that former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife [Hillary] to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

Klein explained that everyone knew what was happening in Benghazi from the CIA to the National Security Agency and that there’s intelligence cables that have not been released.

Wilkow asked, “If everybody knew this including the White House, who would have given the order to go in and save the ambassador?”

Klein, “The President…he should have given the order to use the rapid reaction force…”

Wilkow, “Not Petraeus?”

Klein, “Well it has to come from the president.”

Not only does this reflect very poorly on the Obama administration, but also on the propaganda media that has been trying to protect him every since this happened on the night of 9/11.

This is likely one of the biggest scandals this country has ever seen and it’s been hidden by the Obama administration and the media.

And we hanged Richard Nixon to dry, because of "little old" Watergate???? Dear Lord!!!!! What's happening here????






AdamT let me handle this. Look Navy Pride or Navel or whatever. If you are going to make a claim, then you need a credible source. Linking to a 3rd party porn site or in this case dead link isn't making your claim credible. So,present a credible source so we all can take a look. We all know you think Obama is a.....wait what is it you call him? "Muslim" right? No that is not it. "Socialist" right? No...I know that not right. "Ni-----" I know that can't be it. Oh its President of the United States. That is it. So yea, credible source. Try that first.
 
Back
Top Bottom