• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you be OK if Your Daughter Married a Black Person? World Results

Would you accept your daughter marrying a black person?

Yes why wouldn't I be? My daughter is white and currently dating a Latino man. I wouldn't care what race he is as long as he treats my daughter with love and respect.
 
Being born and raised in Sweden I can confirm that it is indeed the most welcoming place on Earth. However, over the years, we have imported a lot of the toxic waste that is spouted by the American intelligentia and there has - for a long time ä- been a very worrying discourse that has bred hate on both sides.

Additionally, I would like to point out that integration actually is a big problem where the State has failed massively.

The main cause of the failure of integration here in Sweden is not 'the State' but the immigrants , too many of whom hate Sweden and the Swedes and have not the faintest desire to 'integrate'. You may be one of the hand-wringing 'it's all our fault' Swedes; I am not.
 
I would be very upset if my daughter married another human.

Why is this question even being asked? According to most republicans on here racism doesn't exist. Seventy five percent of americans said no they would not be upset. The other twenty five said, hell yes, I'm a racist.
 
Better educated than whom and "educated" in what regard? If we look at Sweden, our school system is one gigantic failure were we keep falling in PISA-ranking for every year that passes. Furthermore, "education" has nothing to do with how "non-racist" one is. The Nazis who propagated for genocide were all prominent scientists with diplomas and high IQ:s.


Eh.... Yes, we do. Here we have actual African immigrants.


Finland definitely scores very low on this.

Well - regarding the PISA ranking, what do you mean be "failing" ?? You beat the United States in almost every metric. I think we inch passed you in "science" by only a single place with a score of 502 vs. 499.

As for the NAZIs being "ALL prominent scientists with diplomas and high IQ's", I think you're conflating their technical education with their social indoctrination. The overwhelming preponderance of genocidal goose-steppers were certainly NOT scientists, and the rocket scientist diaspora that went to Russian and the USA after the war were not the people who propagated genocide.

What % of Sweden's population are African immigrants?
 
Uh, you do realize you just stereotyped the ideology of "a black person" based on skin color. :doh

Seriously. The stupidity of that post is just incredible.

I can't understand the mind of the SJW.:roll: I think, however, it's a zero sum game for SJWs. All that matters is that Floyd was killed. The zero sum was that a black man was killed by a cop.


And SJWs aren't even bashful about their bigotry towards cops. I can't understand that bigotry against cops is acceptable. I don't think any type of bigotry is acceptable.
 
Last edited:
1592911402586.jpg


In order of lowest to highest %

China- 1%
Libya- 1%
Saudi Arabia- 1%
Morocco- 3%
Algeria- 5%
Tunisia- 8%
Egypt- 10%
Russia- 15%
Portugal- 30%
Latvia- 32%
Greece- 42%
Poland- 45%
Estonia- 55%
Austria- 65%
France- 74%
United States- 75%
Turkey- 82%
Germany- 87%
Spain- 88%
United Kingdom- 89%
Netherlands-89%
Sweden- 94%
Norway- 95%
Iceland- 99%
-----------

This really surprised me. Several of the countries least likely to support this kind of marriage are in Africa, while the Nordic countries seemed most likely to accept it. What might account for this fact?

Would you accept your daughter marrying a black person? Frankly, I thought the percentage of Americans who would accept would be much higher.

As long as they weren't Muslim, I wouldn't care.
 
Yes why wouldn't I be? My daughter is white and currently dating a Latino man. I wouldn't care what race he is as long as he treats my daughter with love and respect.

Hint: more blacks disapprove of interracial marriage than whites.
 
I don’t care who my daughters marry, as long as they marry someone good to them. I hope they find a love as strong as I had. That’s all I want.

I don’t care if he is black, white, purple, and I don’t care if it’s a woman.

I want my girls to be happy and have a good life.

True love is too hard to find, without automatically handicapping it by limiting who you can love, based on outdated societal ideals.

Yeah this
 
Uh, you do realize you just stereotyped the ideology of "a black person" based on skin color. :doh

Seriously. The stupidity of that post is just incredible.

I didn't say all blacks think the same way, heavens no. Saying I said otherwise is a strawman argument and this is all the time I'll spent refuting that.

I said I would like the black person marrying my daughter who is an Uncle Tom and not an Aunt Tammy. Did you realize I discriminated against all black females with the not wanting my daughter to marry an Aunt Tammy?:roll: Do you know what an Uncle Tom or Aunt Tammy is?
 
Hint: more blacks disapprove of interracial marriage than whites.

And? The problem was never people disapproving of interracial marriage. The problem was whites that made interracial marriage AGAINST THE LAW and actively beat black men who tried to marry or date a white women. I have no problem with people disapproving of interracial marriage. I have a problem with people ACTIVELY trying to make laws against interracial marriage. If you can't see the difference, I don't know what to tell you.
 
I know what both of those are. I also know that she did not use either of those. She did not make an argument. She asked a question that was designed to highlight how ridiculous your post was.

And I have to tell you, it worked.

Does your white ideology include smoking meth and marrying your cousin? You know because some white people have that ideology.
I neither smoke meth nor married my cousin (but my ex's Grandparents were first cousins in the hills of Kentucky). Look who's doing the 'generalization', here.:lamo To be exact, I mean rjay is doing the generalization not americanwoman whose statement could be considered a passive/aggressive generalization of me, a quasi generalization of me. OK, americanwoman's is a straw man argument of me.:roll:
 
Last edited:
Do you know what an argument is?

Her post was an argument, which successfully showed how moronic and racist it is for you to assume that all people you consider "black" have an identical "ideology" and that it is bad. Apparently the only response you are capable of is to repeat words you think you remember someone saying to someone else dismissively in the past. That, too, is moronic.

You still don't know what a straw man argument or whataboutism is...You just did it again.:roll: Here's what I posted which hackled your latest ire:
I would not support my daughter marrying a black person not so much on their skin color but their ideology.
I wouldn't support a black person marrying my daughter based on the prospective's incompatible ideology...that is correct...that isn't a strawman argument. I didn't specify which ideologies were incompatible nor did I say all blacks have the same ideology. I did use an example of the type of ideology the black man could have that would be compatible with me. I won't waste any more of my time on this type of strawman argument.
 
Last edited:
And? The problem was never people disapproving of interracial marriage. The problem was whites that made interracial marriage AGAINST THE LAW and actively beat black men who tried to marry or date a white women. I have no problem with people disapproving of interracial marriage. I have a problem with people ACTIVELY trying to make laws against interracial marriage. If you can't see the difference, I don't know what to tell you.

What does society typically do when it disapproves of something? It passes laws against it. Miscegenation laws still exist in parts of Asia and the Mideast. Israel just doesn't allow nonreligious marriage within the country, which acts as a preventative measure to discourage interracial marriage. Are we supposed to be outraged by the American laws of a century ago?
 
My daughter is a mix of 6 nationalities, the way it is these days.
 
What does society typically do when it disapproves of something? It passes laws against it. Miscegenation laws still exist in parts of Asia and the Mideast. Israel just doesn't allow nonreligious marriage within the country, which acts as a preventative measure to discourage interracial marriage. Are we supposed to be outraged by the American laws of a century ago?
Actually, the laws concerning miscegenation were just officially removed from the books in one state within the last 20 years, this century. They were unenforceable since 1969, but they were left on the books (and in some cases voted to stay in place until this century) for much longer in many of those places.

Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States - Wikipedia

And in the last 11 years we have had at least one instance where a JOP refused to marry interracial couples. It still does exist in the US. It doesnt affect a majority, but most such things don't, not directly at least.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
The main cause of the failure of integration here in Sweden is not 'the State' but the immigrants , too many of whom hate Sweden and the Swedes and have not the faintest desire to 'integrate'. You may be one of the hand-wringing 'it's all our fault' Swedes; I am not.
Of course it is the State's fault because it is their lousy open-borders policies that have ruined this country. Almost 100 years of Social Democracy and a completely cucked out Borgerlighet have paved the way to catastrophy.

And yes, it is true that many immigrants are pure barbarians and very ungrateful racists.
 
Well - regarding the PISA ranking, what do you mean be "failing" ?? You beat the United States in almost every metric. I think we inch passed you in "science" by only a single place with a score of 502 vs. 499.
Nah, we just cheat. It was recently revealed that the education agencies hid the results of immigrant kids to make it appear as is reading and writing comprehension is on a good level. ;)

What % of Sweden's population are African immigrants?
Much larger than the US, for sure. I grew up in the "immigrant ghettos" and there were plenty of them around.
 
Nah, we just cheat. It was recently revealed that the education agencies hid the results of immigrant kids to make it appear as is reading and writing comprehension is on a good level. ;)


Much larger than the US, for sure. I grew up in the "immigrant ghettos" and there were plenty of them around.

YIKES! You're not even close. 13.4% of our 320,000,000 are Black. Less than 3% of Sweden's population is Black.
Why would you bother to post such inaccuracies here? Don't you know that folks on this site have internet data at their fingertips?
 
YIKES! You're not even close. 13.4% of our 320,000,000 are Black. Less than 3% of Sweden's population is Black.
Why would you bother to post such inaccuracies here? Don't you know that folks on this site have internet data at their fingertips?
Sure, but your Blacks are not African immigrant.s
 
I neither smoke meth nor married my cousin (but my ex's Grandparents were first cousins in the hills of Kentucky). Look who's doing the 'generalization', here.:lamo To be exact, I mean rjay is doing the generalization not americanwoman whose statement could be considered a passive/aggressive generalization of me, a quasi generalization of me. OK, americanwoman's is a straw man argument of me.:roll:

So it seems that we can add generalizations to the list of things you do not seem to understand. My comment was very specifically directed at you, not a generalization at all. It was you I accused of not understanding, the terms strawman or whataboutism. I admit I could have been wrong about that, it could simply be that you entirely missed the point in americanwoman's post.

I hadn't considered that.
I should have.
As I look at your responses with fresh eyes, it is now so obvious.

It would seem I owe you an apology
 
Nordic countries always say "yes" until it happens.

I have been to Norway, there is literally zero interracial couples to be seen.

Immigrants are not assimilated at all, any non whites live practically separate lives
 
Back
Top Bottom