• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Women are Angry, Temporarily Powerful—and Very, Very Dangerous

The ultimate in irony: women should commiserate with blue balls but where is anyone commiserating with women suffering thru 9 months of pregnancy and childbirth for a kid she cant take care of? Oh, that's right, it's all her fault, so she deserves it.

She could choose abortion. Nobody is forcing her to carry the pregnancy to term.
 
She could choose abortion. Nobody is forcing her to carry the pregnancy to term.

I dont disagree but that is a personal choice supported by the Constitution.

What do you suggest?
 
Women are Angry, Temporarily Powerful—and Very, Very Dangerous
They're only "dangerous" to society's weaklings.

I've been worried that our current national climate of punishing men for sexual harassment would eventual spiral out of control, resulting in women abusing our willingness to listen... and it's happened.

Ansari is a married man, so infidelity is his only wrongdoing here, which I'm sure most of us would agree isn't something the world needs to know about.
Playing high-risk games has its consequences, much like Russian Roulette. If he wants to cop-out of his risks after the fact, then perhaps he should have not being a sexually-desperate adulterer who apparently is so limp and unable to satisfy his wife that he has to beg a whore for sex, like a virgin being touched for the very first time. He he

We need to stand up and give women like this the collective boot when they try to compare this to sexual assault, which Grace is doing. Otherwise, we risk damaging men's lives who don't deserve it.

To be blunt, if you're a woman who throws herself at a man, then let's him eat you out at his apartment, then denies him any reciprocal exchange... that makes you a lousy date, not a sexual assault victim!
Doesn't matter, even if he was falsely accused of sexual assault, he would've partly deserved it by virtue of his own stupidity and lust - and I don't see why any other man would bother to care about being removed from the evolutionary playing field, since it's just means less competition for them.
 
They're only "dangerous" to society's weaklings.


Playing high-risk games has its consequences, much like Russian Roulette. If he wants to cop-out of his risks after the fact, then perhaps he should have not being a sexually-desperate adulterer who apparently is so limp and unable to satisfy his wife that he has to beg a whore for sex, like a virgin being touched for the very first time. He he


Doesn't matter, even if he was falsely accused of sexual assault, he would've partly deserved it by virtue of his own stupidity and lust - and I don't see why any other man would bother to care about being removed from the evolutionary playing field, since it's just means less competition for them.

So you deserve to be accused of a crime you did not commit because something you did violates the ethics of some other random person?

That sounds like an impossible standard
 
Back
Top Bottom