- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,311
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Well we were at the closest sense the Great Depression...See post #7.
The first line in the article is wrong.
And,
So you disagree with the study done by Equilar that finds there is a 23% gain from 2009?
We have been at the closest sense the Great Depression.We are not "at or near-Depression level unemployment."
It's deceptive, too, in that it looks only at companies that made billions - such firms are likely to have been successful.
It looked at all the major corporations and companies, so what? Why does that matter? Its not "deceptive" if it openly tells you that its looking at the major companies and corporations...
One! One!? One!? We should feel so bad for him and give him a huge tax break! :roll:I've already posted one example of a CEO whose compensation decreased drastically.
Never saw anywhere that it stated or began to state that "business has no right to be successful". Wondering how you got that out of the article or the snipit you posted.Then it gets to the heart of the matter, it's thesis: If government is broke, business has no right to be successful.
Well it is a socialist article...The whole piece is replete with anti-capitalist buzz words.
Where is "Workers of the world, unite!" If I read nothing but bilge like this all day, I'd be pissed, too.
Well maybe you should stop being so content...