Yes, time will tell.
Of couse, it may have. Then again, in my opinion I don’t believe it would have made any difference in the outcome. I presented my reasons.
Damn, you're good.
Exactly the attitude that such as MAGAts have for anyone else.....even other MAGAts.
Of course it's on fire. It's summer, it's hot brush is dry. Happens every year.
No, because I usually don't have to deal with "water is wet" problem statements.
Even Democrats have complained about that. Clinton fired 400,000 federal employees. Obama and Biden both talked about waste and inefficiency but did nothing about it.
Aw, shucks, you'll turn my pretty head
(but thank you).There’s a huge body of peer-reviewed research ( I know that kind of stuff doesn't probably doesn't mean much to you, but for whatever its worth) showing that rising global temperatures are linked to increased heatwaves, more extreme rainfall, stronger hurricanes, worsening droughts, and even changes in wildfire behavior. The National Academy of Sciences, NASA, NOAA, and other scientific bodies around the world all agree on this.
ah, I see. So President wants to increase timber harvesting while reducing the federal personnel to make it happen. President Trump wants to increase Oil and Gas production from federal lands while reducing the federal personel that would set up the lease sales.
as it was yours.
I find it interesting the fall back rebuttal is something about liberals.. Here is a clue. I am not a liberal. Was a Republican for decades till I became Independent in the last 5 years.
No, the question is whether the Federal government did something it shouldn't have done, or failed to do something it should have, that caused the damage and loss of life in the floods on Texas on Friday.
Has the government been reduced to the point that it can't do what is needed to make the goals for those two things happen?
The name of the site is "Political Debate." If one takes the positions that liberals take, one is likely to be suspected of being a liberal (small "l").
He can, (1) change the way that timber sales are made, or (2) retain only the number of people required to get the job done.
He can, (1) change the way that oil and gas sales are made, or (2) retain only the number of people required to get the job done.
Why answer my question with a question. Show that the increased sales can be done.
funny. then you seem to be saying without saying that all republicans and conservatives agree 100% of the time on all issues. There is never a difference of opinion. Is that right?
actually, the President would have to get members of Congress to change the laws first.
again. The President would have to get Congress to change the federal laws. Some things cannot not be done by EO's. As much as President Trump would like to be able to make it so.
OK. The Government can change the computer application that's used to make sales in such a way that the process is largely automated and tied into the relevant databases of other agencies as required to insure integrity if the sale. Or, if the Government realizes that fewer people are required to make an additional number of sales because the agents involved are wasting time, people can be dismissed. Either solution addresses your question as to how additional sales can be done with fewer people.
Nope.
Nope. Revising a bookkeeping procedure doesn't require Congressional action.
For the items you questioned, no E.O. would be necessary. Now, if we change your question to say that the President wants to sell more timber (or gas and oil) than is allowed under current law, and do it with fewer people, he would have to get Congress to raise the sales limit (although that's probably controlled by regulation that can be changed by the Cabinet Department involved).
CNN reports, "At least 80 people have died in connection with the flash floods that struck central Texas early Friday, according to officials. The toll includes at least 28 children in Kerr County, where 10 girls and one counselor from Camp Mystic are still unaccounted for, authorities said."
Knowing that you wouldn't want to mislead anyone, I thought I'd add the rest of what Trump actually said.
Ugg...ICE Barbie says not Trump's fault.
ICE Barbie Shifts Blame for Flash Floods on Trump’s Watch
Kristi Noem was grilled over the delayed warning residents received during the flash floods in Texas.www.thedailybeast.com
When did she dye her hair?
Actually, Barbies are safe. It's the Daily Beast that gets a bad name. According to TIME magazine;
He blamed Biden. It was a landslide with 1.62% of Americans making him POTUS.
He went on to claim it was a "100 year flood" The Guadaloupe river flooded in 1936, 52, 72, 73, 78, 87, 91, and 1997.