Doesn't look like you have much math background either. Here's what you posted.
Here you have said
Which of the scientists in the articles that you posted came up with that conclusion? The answer to that question is none of them. That is something that you have invented. If you are basing that on genetics, which it seems you are trying to do by posted the first article on mixed Mexican children, either you are the most brilliant geneticist in the world, or you are ignorant. It's one of the two, because that article, nor the second one that you posted comes to that conclusion. Neither is there anything in either of those articles that would lead us to that conclusion. So either you are very brilliant, and you know something that no one else has discovered, or you simply do not understand the material you have posted.
Then next of all you make this assertion
As a result of you faulty conclusion in the first statement, you come to another false conclusion, namely that if everyone is of mixed race, everyone will be susceptible to ALL the diseases known to man. Again, it is something that you have simply invented, You don't have the slightest bit of evidence to support that notion. What is it in the material that you have posted that leads you to that conclusion?
Then finally you reach the false conclusion that as a result of being mixed race, humans will become extinct. It's just an absurd notion. Again, what is it exactly in the material you are basing that on? There is nothing, absolutely nothing in what you have posted so far that would lead on to that conclusion. You have simply misunderstood what you have read.
Those were directly your words from post #54.
BTW, those are not the only ridiculous statements that you have made in this thread. Here's a particularly ignorant conclusion that you put forward in this thread
So it is pretty clear you haven't read anything. So now I am forced to educate you because unlike you, I argue the merits of your argument, not your BS.
Did you look at the genetic disorders and how they spread?
If you have a genetic disorder, there is a good chance your offsprings will have that disorder. Same for blood disorders, like sickle cell which is an inherited diseases.
These diseases don't occupy the same positions in the gene sequence of your DNA. Which means that if you have 2 people each with a genetic disorder, their offsprings could very well inherit both genetic disorders.
One of the articles explained this to you.
The other one was to give an example on one such a disease. Sickle cell, which while it is something that is found in all people of all racial groups, it is many times more prevalent in african and african-descendant people. As in, they are much more likely to have it. But that's a blood disease and it was to point out that there is more than just genetic disorders. There are blood disorders too.
Lets talk genetics.
The ratio for a genetic disorder to be passed on is 3/4. So there is just a 1/4 chance that said genetic disorder is not going to be transmitted. Or 25% out of 100%. Which is why I said in my comment, it's likely but not 100%. It's 75%. People who have a genetic disorder are known as genetic disorder carriers and that disorder may trigger or may lay dorment. But just because it's dormant doesn't make it inactive, it can be passed on. And that's what it does. Most of the times. Like the hunger games, the odds are not in your favor.
So lets look at 2 genetic disorders from 2 ethnic groups in concrete examples.
An European marries a jew and one has Fabry and the other has Tay Sachs.
The offsprings have a 75% chance to inherit each one. So given enough children, a few won't have any disorder. The majority will have 1 out of 2, and the unlucky few will have both. It's mathematics. Same, lets marry a jew to a african. Tay sachs and sickle cell, the rules of mathematics don't bend. Same ratios. Asians have their own share. Arabs have their own. Everyone has their own little nook of genetic disorders, some more than others... some more deadly than others. And so it stands to reason that given sufficient time, if you were to be an individual whom, down the line of your ancestry, had all the races... you'd probably inherit them them all. Like the pokemons. That's just how it works.
I said that there are diseases that are cross-races. And there are. But some are more common among some racial groups than in others. So you're increasing the odds and that's what we're talking about.
And you know why they can get both diseases? Because each disease occupies a different slot on the gene sequences in the gene code. So you can have all the diseases, all the genetic disorders, all of them. You can get them all in your gene code. And it doesn't mean that they'll all trigger. It doesn't mean that they'll all affect you. But you are a carrier and you will spread them on. And given sufficient time, since the odds are 3 to 1, everyone will get worse and worse. And that's how our species dies.
I feel like I shouldn't even have to explain this because it's like... obvious. But again, you keep talking the talk, saying that you're so good at math, but can't make simple mathematics like calculating percentages and odds and understanding how with each iteration (every generation) the odds always get worse under the kind of future you aspire to. And that's not even counting the moral factor of extinction of multiple races just to have 1. I think it's kinda condemnable to wish the extinction of all races just so have one...