WikiLeaks figure says ‘disgusted’ Democrat leaked Clinton campaign emails

[MickeyW]

A WikiLeaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the presidential election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf.
Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.
Craig Murray says source of Hillary Clinton campaign WikiLeaks emails a 'disgusted' Democrat - Washington Times


I posed this theory right after the election and have mentioned it at least two other times since.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

A WikiLeaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the presidential election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf.
Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.
Craig Murray says source of Hillary Clinton campaign WikiLeaks emails a 'disgusted' Democrat - Washington Times


I posed this theory right after the election and have mentioned it at least two other times since.

Yes, well sure.

But it is quite obvious to all liberals reading what you say, that the Russians tipped you off... you see, there is absolutely NO WAY you could have come up with that theory on your own.

C'mon, c'mon, we are all dumbed down sufficiently that nobody these days should ever legitimately consider using something as antiquated as reason or logic ...or hell, those archaic relics of the past, what were they called again..oh yean, facts...I think we have properly established the new "scientific" consensus on this. At least if one truly desires to establish, you know, the truth of the matter.

Just the truth, not to be confused with the real truth, as that is simply outdated, the old fashioned idiocy. Don't you see/get it yet? Can I make it no plainer, should be a no brainer.

In this instance, literally.

 

[Bob N]

A WikiLeaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the presidential election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf.
Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.
Craig Murray says source of Hillary Clinton campaign WikiLeaks emails a 'disgusted' Democrat - Washington Times


I posed this theory right after the election and have mentioned it at least two other times since.

That's a nice story. Let me know when they finish it up with names of the people who did all of that will ya?

Yes, well sure.

But it is quite obvious to all liberals reading what you say, that the Russians tipped you off... you see, there is absolutely NO WAY you could have come up with that theory on your own.

C'mon, c'mon, we are all dumbed down sufficiently that nobody these days should ever legitimately consider using something as antiquated as reason or logic ...or hell, those archaic relics of the past, what were they called again..oh yean, facts...I think we have properly established the new "scientific" consensus on this. At least if one truly desires to establish, you know, the truth of the matter.

Just the truth, not to be confused with the real truth, as that is simply outdated, the old fashioned idiocy. Don't you see/get it yet? Can I make it no plainer, should be a no brainer.

In this instance, literally.

Facts? Truth? From that story? Try taking the same format in to a court room and watch the judge dismiss it. :roll:

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

That's a nice story. Let me know when they finish it up with names of the people who did all of that will ya?

Facts? Truth? From that story? Try taking the same format in to a court room and watch the judge dismiss it. :roll:

Hell, the FBI investigators gave us an open and shut case with the facts and they will not even call a grand jury to make the obvious recommendation... so to wait on a judge, jury and court room decision before one can look at the facts and easily decide, is often a fools errand.

When you have the president of the US come in on one side, like he did with Trayvon Martin, Prof Gates and Michael Smith ... like here without the facts, and he got it completely wrong, you begin to notice the undeniable pattern. Bias and insufficient facts do not mix up into a final product of truth. Understandably not.

Understandable to most of us.

We keep hearing its the Russians, all the way up to Putin, that Trump knew. Information please? Sources? O bomb a et al need to either put up or shut up... Putin has called him on it, so Putin probably knows the weakling has nothing. Hell, he is so embarrassing this little boy president.

Jan 20 cannot get here fast enough.

 

[Bob N]

Hell, the FBI investigators gave us an open and shut case with the facts and they will not even call a grand jury to make the obvious recommendation... so to wait on a judge, jury and court room decision before one can look at the facts and easily decide, is often a fools errand.

When you have the president of the US come in on one side, like he did with Trayvon Martin, Prof Gates and Michael Smith ... like here without the facts, and he got it completely wrong, you begin to notice the undeniable pattern. Bias and insufficient facts do not mix up into a final product of truth. Understandably not.

Understandable to most of us.

We keep hearing its the Russians, all the way up to Putin, that Trump knew. Information please? Sources? O bomb a et al need to either put up or shut up... Putin has called him on it, so Putin probably knows the weakling has nothing. Hell, he is so embarrassing this little boy president.

Jan 20 cannot get here fast enough.

Believe it or not, I can't wait either for you to get what you are not expecting--and it's coming at you full speed too.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

Believe it or not, I can't wait either for you to get what you are not expecting--and it's coming at you full speed too.

We have achieved agreement then. Get that wastrel out of the People's House and let the new President assume proper power.

 

[Bob N]

We have achieved agreement then. Get that wastrel out of the People's House and let the new President assume proper power.

Yes. We. Do. I'm not a great fan of either party. I haven't seen a good president that would make my eyes pop out of my head yet--from either side. And you might as well throw Congress in to boot.

I hope that every thing I'm thinking about the Donald is wrong. Unless he changes his way, I honestly believe we're in trouble.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

Yes. We. Do. I'm not a great fan of either party. I haven't seen a good president that would make my eyes pop out of my head yet--from either side. And you might as well throw Congress in to boot.

I hope that every thing I'm thinking about the Donald is wrong. Unless he changes his way, I honestly believe we're in trouble.

We are already in trouble, we had O bomb a for 8 straight years. Reconstruction of the economy, start cleaning and clearing up our immigration mess, leadership and strength in our trade dealings, the military, need massive cuts in various areas of the Federal government, need to start repairing our culture, our morals, smooth out the wrinkles expressing tolerance for those who deviate from the norm.

But no, you are not bending us over and only clinching for the next unexpected rude thing to poke its unwanted head where it does no belong anymore. Tolerance is key, promotion and encouragement, not so much.

Trump will be, minimum, better than BO, he stunk.

 

[RickJames3000]

Do we need a thread about this nonsense every damned day?

 

[Bob N]

We are already in trouble, we had O bomb a for 8 straight years. Reconstruction of the economy, start cleaning and clearing up our immigration mess, leadership and strength in our trade dealings, the military, need massive cuts in various areas of the Federal government, need to start repairing our culture, our morals, smooth out the wrinkles expressing tolerance for those who deviate from the norm.

But no, you are not bending us over and only clinching for the next unexpected rude thing to poke its unwanted head where it does no belong anymore. Tolerance is key, promotion and encouragement, not so much.

Trump will be, minimum, better than BO, he stunk.

So you must think a sitting President is a monarch? Where does Congress fit in on all of this?

And if you thought that Obama not having a bipartisan lawmaking body to work with was bad, wait until you see what a GOP lawmaking body does to Trump. Don't believe me? Wait and see. :yes:

 

[faithful_servant]

That's a nice story. Let me know when they finish it up with names of the people who did all of that will ya?

Facts? Truth? From that story? Try taking the same format in to a court room and watch the judge dismiss it. :roll:

What's so sad about your reply is that there is the same amount of proof that the Russians hacked the DNC as there is for the OP. But you'll reject the one you don't like and accept the one you do like.

 

[VanceMack]

That's a nice story. Let me know when they finish it up with names of the people who did all of that will ya?

Facts? Truth? From that story? Try taking the same format in to a court room and watch the judge dismiss it. :roll:

Names? Evidence? NOW you want evidence? Can you provide the evidence that says the Russians did it? And did you buy THAT story?

 

[Bob N]

Names? Evidence? NOW you want evidence? Can you provide the evidence that says the Russians did it? And did you buy THAT story?

CIA says that they have the evidence; you won't know until they release it.

 

[Bob N]

What's so sad about your reply is that there is the same amount of proof that the Russians hacked the DNC as there is for the OP. But you'll reject the one you don't like and accept the one you do like.

CIA said they did it. Until you prove them wrong your opinion is duly noted, sir.

 

[blackjack50]

CIA said they did it. Until you prove them wrong your opinion is duly noted, sir.

Lol. Because the CIA would never lie to the American people.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[SMTA]

A WikiLeaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the presidential election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf.
Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.
Craig Murray says source of Hillary Clinton campaign WikiLeaks emails a 'disgusted' Democrat - Washington Times


I posed this theory right after the election and have mentioned it at least two other times since.

So what?

Mention your bull**** theories based upon no facts as many times as you want - it does not make them true.

You always make outrageous claims devoid of facts or evidence constantly that have no place in reality.

You seriously need to seek medical help.

 

[eohrnberger]

So what?

Mention your bull**** theories based upon no facts as many times as you want - it does not make them true.

You always make outrageous claims devoid of facts or evidence constantly that have no place in reality.

You seriously need to seek medical help.

Could say much the same for those who believe that the Russians hacked the DNC and Podesta to the exclusion of any other alternative source.

WikiLeaks, Julian, and the UK ex-Ambassador have been saying since the first WikiLeaks that the source isn't the Russians, yet everyone on the left would rather believe this invention (aren't all the leads of these 17 US spy agencies political appointments?) as opposed to a disgruntled and disillusioned malcontent amongst their own ranks.

Right now, I have greater belief in WikiLeaks, Julian, and the UK ex-Ambassador's assertion than those of the 17 agency political appointments, at least until proven otherwise.

 

[RickJames3000]

Right now, I have greater belief in WikiLeaks, Julian, and the UK ex-Ambassador's assertion than those of the 17 agency political appointments, at least until proven otherwise.

That's what made you and the rest of the Trump Cult the perfect dupes for Russian manipulation!

 

[cabse5]

Really, did some of yous guys want to ACTUALLY investigate voter fraud? BTW, the Wikileaks hacking of the DNC is not voter fraud. Not one single bit of evidence shows any US voters' submissions were tampered with. What the Wikileaks did was reveal previously unrevealed information to possibly make the decision of the voter more clear. Does Wikileaks have a grudge against Hillary? No doubt.

Actually want to convene a congressional panel to investigate voter fraud? (1)Then investigate states like California, New York and Illinois, for examples, for their allowing undocumented, er, illegal Americans to vote. At least, California issues drivers' licenses to undocumented individuals. It's not at all a large step to go from issuing drivers' licenses to undocumenteds, er, illegals to accepting that drivers' license/SS# documentation as proof for the person to vote in the American election. (2)In Detroit, there were a total of 782 more votes tabulated by voting machines than the number of voters listed as picking up ballots in the precincts’ poll books. Another 382 Detroiters were listed as voting but their ballots never showed up in the count. Detroit's election woes: 782 more votes than voters

 

[Henrin]

Wikileaks has been saying this for months now.

 

[ReverendHellh0und]

That's a nice story. Let me know when they finish it up with names of the people who did all of that will ya?

Facts? Truth? From that story? Try taking the same format in to a court room and watch the judge dismiss it. :roll:

Right after the CIA releases actual evidence....

 

[Henrin]

CIA says that they have the evidence; you won't know until they release it.

And you believe the CIA? :lamo You would think people would have learned some fifty years ago to stop believing their ****.

 

[ReverendHellh0und]

CIA said they did it. Until you prove them wrong your opinion is duly noted, sir.

You mean Cause they were so truthful when they said:



"THERE ARE NO DETENTION SITES"

" FEWER THAN 100 PEOPLE ARE HELD BY THE CIA"

"THE CIA DOES NOT VIDEOTAPE INTERROGATIONS"

"THE PROGRAM WAS CLEARED WITH LEADERS IN CONGRESS"

"ONLY THE BEST SPECIALISTS ARE USED AS INTERROGATORS"


"STARVATION IS NOT AN INTERROGATION TACTIC"

"SLEEP DEPRIVATION STOPS BEFORE IT BECOMES MEDICALLY DAMAGING"

"INTERROGATIONS HAVE STOPPED PLOTS IN PROGRESS"

 

[eohrnberger]

That's what made you and the rest of the Trump Cult the perfect dupes for Russian manipulation!

It's what makes the leftists perfect dupes for the partisan politically motivated memes (if compliant with your ideology).
Remember when this very administration claimed the Benghazi attack was a spontaneous protest against some Internet video?
Yeah, that. Seems history repeats.

So, no, until compelling evidence is presented, no I don't believe them.

 

[VanceMack]

CIA says that they have the evidence; you won't know until they release it.

Neither will you.

People within the CIA see the CIA as a political body far more interesting in saying what the President Du Joir wants them to say than saying what is right. You might want to read John Nixons book on the CIA for a feel. They are a bureaucracy. Its not that there arent great agents doing great things....but they are political.