This isn't about who sees men more favourably. It's about recognising the reality of being a male, which you'll never understand because you're not one.
Your comprehension of my opinion on males is also incorrect. I've never said that men are neanderthals who can't control themselves. I said that if a woman offers them sex, they're going to take it. Part of that is supply and demand: if men pass up sex there's no garuantee they will get another chance. The other is that, according to biology, men have a much higher sex drive than women. This is undeniable.
What you don't understand is that the challenge of being a good man is acting sensibly in spite of all the characteristics I mentioned. Ultimately, it is these qualities that make a man good. If men didn't have a high sex drive and constantly crave sex so much, they wouldn't get married, be fathers, build houses, devote their life to supplying for their family, jump out of bed at 3am when an intruder threatens their family, or even fight wars against tyranny and oppression. There's a reason why men do those things so much better than women. It's because they're geared for it. Masculinity is like a gun: ultimately it serves a very good purpose as long as you know how to use it. Like anything, it is very easy to misuse and the consequences can be terrible.
Recognizing that guns can be used to kill children doesn't men I'm against guns. It just means I'm a sensible gun owner who knows the dangers of a gun. Recognizing that masculinity can be used to rape women doesn't mean I'm against masculinity. It just means I'm a sensible male who is aware of the dangers of being a man and how to harness them.