Why isn't Joe Biden out there defending himself?

[Kerry Won Ohio]

But you claimed he was AWOL.... in conjunction with letting the physical slip.

That's where you lied.

I hate to break this to you, but that document that you posted does not prove that Bush was not AWOL.

It was just a letter telling him to report for his flight physical, nothing more. Anything else is just wishful thinking on your part.

 

[ataraxia]

I could not agree more. Why Biden is not out there defending himself is beyond me. I can only assume he is taking this advice from campaign advisors. Its the wrong advice, Joe needs to come out swinging.

I don’t know. Sometimes if a dog is barking at you, it’s best to just ignore it until it tires itself out. The insults and slander are getting tiresome for everyone except his deplorable base. And they are so under the spell of the cult and rabid that they would stick with him even if he stood in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shot people- so they are beyond any help or rationality and don’t matter at this point. The more they bark, the more they are going to turn everyone else off.

 

[Kerry Won Ohio]

Even if there were evidence it would be irrelevant to the President's abuse of power.

Agreed. It sounds like Hunter Biden is very similar to George W. Bush -- The son of a famous politician who was a total screw-up the first 40 years of his life, but was always bailed out of trouble or given second chances by daddy's rich friends.

However, none of this changes the fact that Trump is guilty as hell. I will say that as more stuff comes out about Hunter Biden, it's going to hurt Joe Biden. Americans, particularly Democrats, do not like these stories of an "idiot son of privilege" always coming out on top. Joe Biden is going to have a lot of explaining to do regarding his son.

 

[Lord of Planar]

I hate to break this to you, but that document that you posted does not prove that Bush was not AWOL.

It was just a letter telling him to report for his flight physical, nothing more. Anything else is just wishful thinking on your part.

That burden is on the accuser. We have a tradition here. Innocent until proven guilty. I have already shown some of your facts are lies. An intelligent person will see you as a tool.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Thank you for posting this. You finished digging the hole in the ground and then you jumped in it. Now I will start shoveling in the dirt.

This is what Col Hodges told the New York Times, which I guess you missed in your own article that you posted:



As the article quote above stated, the Air National Guard documents stating that Bush was suspended from flying were released by the White House. Therefore, all of your whining about Dan Rather does not change this simple fact. Are you now going to argue that the White House also released forged documents that they got from the Air National Guard?

As I already explained to you several times, the forged documents that you keep going on about are totally unrelated to Bush being grounded for missing his physical. Bush missed his flight physical because 1) he was AWOL, B) he was drunk all the time, or C) he was coked-up all the time.

Take your pick on 1 of the 3 answers, I don't really care. But the bottom line is that I'm right and you're wrong.

Reflective of what was said is not the same thing. There are possibilities not explored, and you insist on only one.

That is a very ignorant viewpoint. Again, Lt. Bush was on a special assignment. There are probably legitimate reasons he didn't make it.

If anyone is digging themselves deeper, it is you. There are plenty of valid reason possible. The burden of proof is on you, and it is not satisfactory. Especially since four documents were presented that were clearly forgeries.

 

[LosAngelesAngel]

 

[Kerry Won Ohio]

That burden is on the accuser. We have a tradition here. Innocent until proven guilty. I have already shown some of your facts are lies. An intelligent person will see you as a tool.

You haven't shown diddly squat. You keep whining about Dan Rather and forged documents, when it has nothing to do with the fact that Bush was grounded in Sept 1972 by his commander, as reported by Bush's own White House. I buried you and there is nothing you can do about it except change the subject.

What "special assignment" was Bush on? Getting f*cked-up all the time? You talk about me making assumptions, when this was completely pulled out of your ass. You make up bull$hit when you lose an argument, like all Repugs.

 

[Lord of Planar]

You haven't shown diddly squat. You keep whining about Dan Rather and forged documents, when it has nothing to do with the fact that Bush was grounded in Sept 1972 by his commander, as reported by Bush's own White House. I buried you and there is nothing you can do about it except change the subject.

What "special assignment" was Bush on? Getting f*cked-up all the time? You make up bull$hit when you lose an argument, like all Repugs.

I will accept that he was likely grounded. This was never a concern of mine, and if that's all you have, I pity you. This would be a decision the commander had to make if Lt. Bush didn't keep his flights current. The accusation you made was he was AWOL because he didn't take the physical.

I was in the Army for several years, and I understand how special assignments can make you miss normal mandatory events. As for what assignment he was on? It simply doesn't matter. The record reflects he was.

You lied. You claimed he was AWOL.

You cannot dig yourself out of that.

You are a useful tool for the left, repeating lies and propaganda that suit your confirmation bias and hate.

 

[Kerry Won Ohio]

I will accept that he was likely grounded. This was never a concern of mine, and if that's all you have, I pity you. This would be a decision the commander had to make if Lt. Bush didn't keep his flights current. The accusation you made was he was AWOL because he didn't take the physical.

I was in the Army for several years, and I understand how special assignments can make you miss normal mandatory events. As for what assignment he was on? It simply doesn't matter. The record reflects he was.

You lied. You claimed he was AWOL.


You cannot dig yourself out of that.

You are a useful tool for the left, repeating lies and propaganda that suit your confirmation bias and hate.

LOL. It's bad enough that he didn't show up for his flight physical, which no pilot fails to do. That reflects poorly on Bush's dedication and professionalism and should have "concerned" you, but obviously it didn't. I assume you still voted for the idiot. The fact that Bush, to this day, STILL hasn't offered an explanation makes it worse.

How do you know I lied? It's not a lie if I have good reason to believe it. The fact that he didn't show up for his flight physical is strong evidence that, indeed, Bush was AWOL.

 

[Lord of Planar]

LOL. It's bad enough that he didn't show up for his flight physical, which no pilot fails to do. That reflects poorly on Bush's dedication and professionalism and should have "concerned" you, but obviously it didn't. I assume you still voted for the idiot. The fact that Bush, to this day, STILL hasn't offered an explanation makes it worse.

How do you know I lied? It's not a lie if I have good reason to believe it. The fact that he didn't show up for his flight physical is strong evidence that, indeed, Bush was AWOL.

You are judging from a biased viewpoint. Without know the "why," you are just being a useful idiot of the left.

I'm done with this conversation. I indulged in this sidetrack to show how the left lies and how the lies persist even after proven to be a lie.

Do you like being a poster child?

So long.

 

[Kerry Won Ohio]

You are judging from a biased viewpoint. Without know the "why," you are just being a useful idiot of the left.

I'm done with this conversation. I indulged in this sidetrack to show how the left lies and how the lies persist even after proven to be a lie.

Do you like being a poster child?

So long.

Whatever, you accused me of telling a lie when I didn't. I believe Bush was AWOL, so that's not a lie.

And you've basically conceded that I have good reason to believe that Bush was AWOL, since he missed his flight physical and was grounded for it.

You will accept that Bush "was likely grounded"?? Bravo. That's very big of you, Sir. Considering his commanding officer stated that Bush was grounded in Sept 1972, and Bush's own White House also admitted that he was grounded!!

But you will "accept" facts...that is very admirable for a Repug to do.

 

[Oborosen]

No there is no evidence that Biden was protecting his son from anything. There is plenty of evidence that Jared used his "position" in the Trump Administration to secure loans and enrich his families business to the tune of 100's of millions of dollars. Ivanka also received and is receiving valuable trademarks from China worth millions that are apparently being used as a bargaining chip in Trumps Trade negotiations. This is yet another example of Trump taking his own shady behavior and turning it around to accuse a opponent of what he is blatantly doing daily.

I'm guessing I don't need to describe what using the words either/or means in the term on a sentence and that you're just ignoring them to suit your own agenda.