1069
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2006
- Messages
- 24,975
- Reaction score
- 5,126
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I agree. It is a byproduct of a very good thing... liberation/suffrage. That being said, how does it benefit kids to be in day care or babysat by the TV simply so that mom and dad can have two incomes and careers? I don't think that it does...
You're right... I didn't give you the same respect. Sorry. I will get to your post soon.
Well said and thank you for sharing... :2razz:
Every person has a masculine and feminine side... the healthiest possible way of raising children is balance. A mother and a father are the best way to do this, all things being equal.
If "every person has a masculine and a feminine side" then why do kids need a mother and a father?
That doesn't make sense.
Any two- or one, or three, or five- people will do.
Two moms? Sure. They each have a masculine and a feminine side.
Two dads? Why not? They've each got a feminine side as well as a masculine side.
One dad? Why the hell not? He's got both a masculine and a feminine side to him. Who even needs a mom?
I don't know where you're getting this "masculine and feminine side" thing, anyhow.
While sex is biological, gender is merely a social construct, and doesn't have anything to do, really, with raising kids.
I didn't have a mom. I'm glad I didn't. I turned out fine.