• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

I think I will call you "vudu boy" from now on.
Ya do that for me. I'll explain how I made a fool out of you and you had nothing and felt cornered so you pointed out that I wrote VUDU DOLL.
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

Ya do that for me. I'll explain how I made a fool out of you and you had nothing and felt cornered so you pointed out that I wrote VUDU DOLL.

Vudu boy has made a fool out of me.
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

The constitution does not, in any way, state that citizens today, have the right to own assault weapons.
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

The constitution does not, in any way, state that citizens today, have the right to own assault weapons.

Does that need to be explicitly stated?
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

I only have one thing to say, that is that the court defines and interprets the constitution , that the courts can regulate guns and the courts have regulated guns and the court will regulate guns in the future. Which is great and they need much regulations, way more then they have now.
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

They aren't assault guns or assault weapons . Just more lies from the gun Bubbas. View attachment 67231927

Here is your statement:

Every gun produce in the country sold it as a Assault weapon until the heat got on and a watch dog for the gun industry suggesting calling it something else and they have , I beleive what they said in the first place that It is called a assault weapon because they were being accurate at the time and the change was only to sweeten the assault weapons propaganda. So don't anyone believe his line of reasoning it's just another bubba lie or distortion.

All I did was provide the evidence that your statement was a misrepresentation. And for the record, here is how Adam's Arms markets the same gun from your private seller, and the term "assault weapon" is not mentioned:

IMG_7338.jpg
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

The constitution does not, in any way, state that citizens today, have the right to own assault weapons.

the bill of rights contains a blanket restriction on the federal government from interfering with what sort of arms citizen can keep and bear. The tenth amendment also prevents the federal government from acting in areas where it was not specifically delegated power to act

your "understanding" of how the constitution works is rather pathetic
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

Does that need to be explicitly stated?

He doesn't understand how the constitution works
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

They aren't assault guns or assault weapons . Just more lies from the gun Bubbas. View attachment 67231927

You do know that Heckler & Koch is a German company that makes actual assault weapons for the military and law enforcement, right?
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

You really only have two choices: rebut my post with actual evidence or be incapable of rebutting my post. So far you are stuck in the latter.

I believe that I gave you a list of historical evidence that demonstrates that your views are inaccurate. You are welcome to provide the historical evidence that refutes my list.
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

The constitution does not, in any way, state that citizens today, have the right to own assault weapons.

What does the preamble to the first ten amendments state?
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

What does the preamble to the first ten amendments state?

you might as well ask a pigeon how to beat Kasparov in Chess or Rafa Nadal in Tennis
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

Here is your statement:



All I did was provide the evidence that your statement was a misrepresentation. And for the record, here is how Adam's Arms markets the same gun from your private seller, and the term "assault weapon" is not mentioned:

IMG_7338.jpg
You must be joking, I told you that they called the assault weapons assault weapons .until they got the pressure from the public so a gun support organization suggest changing the name to take the heat off. Who's arguing what they are called now. The weak minded gun bubbas think that they can change the name of something , like calling a duck a squirrel and if your followers are stupid enough to play along then they can now call a duck a squirrel.
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

You do know that Heckler & Koch is a German company that makes actual assault weapons for the military and law enforcement, right?
There are picture of Adamas arms and colts, what does this picture have to with what your saying.
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

I believe that I gave you a list of historical evidence that demonstrates that your views are inaccurate. You are welcome to provide the historical evidence that refutes my list.
Could someone here sing out loud, this clown is putting me to sleep, they are so boring.
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

What does the preamble to the first ten amendments state?
I only have one thing to say, that is that the court defines and interprets the constitution , that the courts can regulate guns and the courts have regulated guns and the court will regulate guns in the future. Which is great and they need much regulations, way more then they have now.
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

The constitution does not, in any way, state that citizens today, have the right to own assault weapons.
Define "assault weapons". What the Constitution absolutely says is that citizens as members of the militia have the uninfringed right to keep and bear military grade firearms in the defense of a free state. You should try actually reading it before you comment on whats in it.
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

More ads that calls assault weapons assault weapons
Screenshot from 2018-04-20 10-16-33.webp
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

I think the more important question is what logical reasoning is there to ban AR-15s. There are more powerful rifles out there, the only reason this gun is used as much as it is in mass shootings is due to the demonization of it in the media and copycats.
 
re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243, 2001]

Screenshot from 2018-04-20 10-31-07.webp
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

I think the more important question is what logical reasoning is there to ban AR-15s. There are more powerful rifles out there, the only reason this gun is used as much as it is in mass shootings is due to the demonization of it in the media and copycats.
No it isn't it because gun Bubbas measure the size of your units by buying these assault weapons, as do the people who do the mass murders.
 
Re: Why do you "need" an AR 15? [W243]

Define "assault weapons". What the Constitution absolutely says is that citizens as members of the militia have the uninfringed right to keep and bear military grade firearms in the defense of a free state. You should try actually reading it before you comment on whats in it.
Bull**** what it says exactly is ""A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."" any time the court wants to or think it is true they can simply define well regulated as well regulated. Fact, the court can interpret the constitution, they have the right to regulate guns, they have regulated guns and they will regulate guns in the future. That is all that matters. they have already decided for the ban of ar15 gun
at the state level.
 
Back
Top Bottom