- Joined
- Sep 28, 2019
- Messages
- 6,571
- Reaction score
- 1,969
- Location
- St. Louis
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Excellent article from the Washington Post. Excerpt below:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...cbed14-3316-11ea-91fd-82d4e04a3fac_story.html
Obviously, our national security apparatus is broken. If generals give a dimwit nut job like Trump an ill-advised crazy option, it's highly likely he is going to choose the crazy option.
In this case, the Pentagon deserves just as much blame as Donald Trump.
Instead of holding a tightly managed, inclusive debate in the Situation Room, Trump made one of the most dangerous choices of his presidency among a tiny group at Mar-a-Lago. Such decisive moments are usually preceded by hundreds of people spending countless hours in dingy government offices and conference rooms, building PowerPoint slides and questioning lawyers. These individuals create the parameters and permutations of what the decision-makers consider. They identify the possible options, vetting their likely operational, diplomatic, economic and other effects. That work enables the commander in chief to make wrenching decisions about his military options wisely.
At least, that is how decisions are supposed to be made, and how we helped leaders make them when we worked in government. Bad options, considered with little serious deliberation on an unnecessarily rapid timeline, should never get to the president in the first place.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...cbed14-3316-11ea-91fd-82d4e04a3fac_story.html
Obviously, our national security apparatus is broken. If generals give a dimwit nut job like Trump an ill-advised crazy option, it's highly likely he is going to choose the crazy option.
In this case, the Pentagon deserves just as much blame as Donald Trump.