• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is this Black Goddess on the verge of becoming the first black female President in US History?

Hari Seldon said:
Better a "black goddess" than a malignant, narcissist scumbag.
Click to expand...

Aside from that,I don't think she has a snowball's chance in actually getting the VP nod. First of all, she doesn't have the experience. While I do see her as playing a role in a Biden administration, I just don7't think it will be a VP role.
 
RAMOSS said:
Aside from that,I don't think she has a snowball's chance in actually getting the VP nod. First of all, she doesn't have the experience. While I do see her as playing a role in a Biden administration, I just don7't think it will be a VP role.
Click to expand...

You could be right. The Nectarine Nero gets worse by the day.
 
RAMOSS said:
Aside from that,I don't think she has a snowball's chance in actually getting the VP nod. First of all, she doesn't have the experience. While I do see her as playing a role in a Biden administration, I just don7't think it will be a VP role.
Click to expand...

It won't matter. Biden is going down bigly in November. It will be a bigger landslide than when Trump spanked Hillary
 
lemmiwinx said:
If there was going to be a black female president it might as well be Boxcar Abrams I guess. I'd rather it be Condoleezza Rice but beggars can't be choosers.

View attachment 67281005
Click to expand...

I'd vote for Condi.
I'd be likely to vote for Candice Owens, but I'd want to hear more about her public policy proposals first.
 
veritas1 said:
Lots of people have degrees. It doesn't make them presidential material. She's only of interest because she's the proper gender and color. That's always top of the list for Dems.
Click to expand...

...says a GOPer, whose party almost exclusively selects from a list of old white (and typically racist) white men with decidedly mediocre professional and academic resume's.

Geez...the stupidity that comes from the keyboards of Trumpians .... :roll:
 
Grand Mal said:
If you listen to the rightists here America is already the most corrupt failed state in the First World. Hell, America is a corrupt failed state if you listen to its President. The electoral process is rigged and a disaster to democracy, the intelligence agencies are like Nazi Germany, the judiciary is corrupt, the free press is the enemy of Americans, even the White House is a dump. And That's just according to the Prez. Ordinary right wingers will tell you that doctors routinely falsify death certificates to scam government money, Governors falsify epidemic statistics for political reasons, there's a fifth column, a 'deep state' entrenched in the government with the purpose of undermining the society, blah blah blah.
Click to expand...

If you don't like America now you sure as hell won't like it after democrats finish transforming God Bless America into the Goddam Democrat Socialist States of the Atheistic Hedonist World Union.
 
ultmd said:
Really? That's what Obama says?
Are you sure you're not lying about this, marke?
I think you are.
What we know is that Obama graduated Magna cum laude from Harvard Law, which means "only" top 10% (as compared to Summa cum laude, which is usually top 1-2%). Perhaps you never graduated with any honors, so you are confused? We also know that Obama was selected editor of the Harvard Law Review after his 1st year at Harvard Law...then selected as President of the Law Review after his 2nd year. No one disputes that resume'.
Click to expand...

All I said is that it is common for humans to lie about their achievements and that very few people from Harvard remember Obama as a classmate or a student.

I had a few academic honors when young but so what? I could have gone to West Point and had a guaranteed appointment but turned it down. Besides, I might be smart but I would have never been 1st in the class like Robert E. Lee, Douglas MacArthur, or Mike Pompeo. And, to make it worse, had I cared about these things, my younger brother was and is smarter than me and has a frikken genius IQ off the charts.

The nice thing about my experiences in life is that I am an old Christian man now and can easily see how insignificant all these things are. Robert E. Lee and Douglas MacArthur are now dead, and they took none of their accomplishments beyond the grave with them. We should live for Christ now and not worry about earthly honor or glory.

This is a verbatim TRUMP LIE. No one else says that.
But since you just repeated that moronic lie...can you post ANY examples of "former students and teachers" at Harvard who have backed up that LIE?
Or, are you content to just stand by this lie, and make yourself a liar....once again?
You're talking about Trump, right?
Of course, no one has ever seen Trump's grades, either. But we know he never graduated with any honors, not even from high school.
Click to expand...
 
veritas1 said:
She's black, Democrat, female and liberal so she must be qualified for..........something.
Click to expand...

As a legislator, she was only liberal when it helped her career. In that regard, she is another Kamala Harris.
 
tres borrachos said:
I know, right? He should have just slandered the FBI. Then he would have been a right wing hero.

Oh wait. No. He would still be black, so there would be that. No right wing hero for Obama!

You should look into Norway. Mostly white people. That's why Trump loves it. You will too.
Click to expand...

Obama rushed to stupid judgment and slandered decorated white officer Sgt. James Crowley in what became known as the beer summit fiasco. I blame Obama's black Muslim past for that momentary lapse in his judgment. I don't think he wanted to be racist and I don't think he always acted with improper bias, but he did show his racist background from time to time.
 
JustHanging said:
Yeah, sites like Stormfront and Brietbart aren't likely to acknowledge the accomplishments of the first black POTUS.

He graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School (the second highest honor available) in 1991. He also was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review, a very prestigious honor.

You really think not one professor or student at Harvard can remember the first black President of the Harvard Law Review? Really? That's your informed opinion is it?
Obviously you don't believe that. You support a blatant racist like Trump, the leader of the racist Birther Movement.
Click to expand...

My brother in law graduated from Ohio State magna cum laude in Aeronautical Engineering, spent more than a dozen years as a Navy pilot and now works for a defense contractor. We know that about him because we have multiple evidences. What Obama has failed to provide are multiple evidences of his claim to have graduated from Harvard with honors.
 
iguanaman said:
All I know is that the Republicans were so afraid of her that they devised an elaborate scheme to cheat her out of the Governorship.

GOP Adviser Slams Georgia's Brian Kemp For Cheating and Undermining Democracy To Win Governor Race
Click to expand...

One thing the democrat losers have in common, whether it is Al Gore, Hillary Clinton or Stacey Abrams, is that they sure know how to blame the American people, the crooked voting process, the republicans, the weather, Russians, hanging chads or a thousand other things for their loss they consider to be unfair and a huge injustice.
 
Grand Mal said:
Competence? A serial bankrupt who inherited a fortune and can't get credit in the USA any more? A fraud who is no longer allowed to operate a charity? I'm the first to call the Democratic Party the most bumbling political losers in the Western world but that's based on them being the only political organization that could lose such a high-stakes election to such a whiny crooked spoiled-brat trust-fund baby. But that was when they had Hillary Clinton. She was leprosy and Trump syphilis. This time if Biden just sits down and shuts up Trump will not only lose on his own merits, he'll torpedo the Republican Party's federal aspirations for two generations.
Biden doesn't matter. All he needs to win will be brought by Trump.
Click to expand...

I believe Abrams could do something Trump would never be able to do. She could find a way to dump a trillion tax dollars into the laps of brown and black people and call it "just desserts" for hundreds of years of white oppression.
 
marke said:
I believe Abrams could do something Trump would never be able to do. She could find a way to dump a trillion tax dollars into the laps of brown and black people and call it "just desserts" for hundreds of years of white oppression.
Click to expand...

I believe you believe that.
 
marke said:
I believe Abrams could improve her poll numbers if she could get hold of whatever it is that gives AOC such a youthful innocent appearance.
Click to expand...

The sourpuss crab face did not work for Hillary and I doubt it will for Stacey either.
 
marke said:
One thing the democrat losers have in common, whether it is Al Gore, Hillary Clinton or Stacey Abrams, is that they sure know how to blame the American people, the crooked voting process, the republicans, the weather, Russians, hanging chads or a thousand other things for their loss they consider to be unfair and a huge injustice.
Click to expand...

It is true. Not accepting election results degrades the electorate’s trust in the institution of elections and the institutions of the US federal government.

Two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has added the 2018 Georgia gubernatorial race to the list of elections she believes were stolen from Democrats, which is quite the turnaround for the woman who said in 2016 that it is “a direct threat to our democracy” to even question the outcome of a U.S. election.

Hillary Clinton once claimed that questioning US election results was a threat to democracy; guess what she's doing now?



 
marke said:
. . . .
Click to expand...

So how come Democrats continue to claim that every election they lose the election is rigged, stolen, and the Republican that does win the election is illegitimate, somehow.


 
marke said:
. . . .
Click to expand...

Now, they are invalidating an expected election result they don’t like preemptively: (I mean, why wait until the last minute, right?)

On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Representative Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said it was a “matter of urgency” to deal with the president’s pattern of behavior ahead of the next election. On CNN’s State of the Union, Nadler said Trump may try to “rig” the 2020 vote.
Nadler Says Without Impeachment, Trump May ‘Rig’ 2020 Vote

Which legitimately leads to asking the question:
Will Democrats Accept the Results of the 2020 Elections?

So how come Democrats continue to claim that every election they lose the election is rigged, stolen, and the Republican that does win the election is illegitimate, somehow. Isn’t that the same “direct threat to our democracy”? Or are Democrats so insular and partisan in their thinking that anyone of opposing viewpoints who wins an election is a “direct threat to our democracy”?

With this history of, and a well-established track record of, bogus claims of election illegitimacy when Democrats lose, it certainly seems like Democrats would be far happier in a one party state, just as long as the part is the Democrat party. Might I suggest that Democrats move to China or North Korea, where there really is only one party? Rather than bringing those political systems to the US.

'Elections have consequences' - MSNBC.com
https://www.msnbc.com › the-last-word › watch › elections-have-consequen...
Nov 16, 2012

“there is only one kind of legitimate presidential election: one where they win.”

Any time Democrats whine about losing an election and that the election results are illegitimate; they deserve to be ignored (boy who cried wolf). If it weren’t for double standards, Democrats wouldn’t have any standards at all.

With Democrats conducting a baseless and manufactured impeachment of a legitimately elected president to undo an election they didn’t like the results of, the Democrats can go pound sand as far as I’m concerned. As far as I’m concerned, the Democrats should lose every election until they improve their public policy proposals and accept the results of legitimate elections.

It is true. Not accepting election results is a threat to the Republic. Not accepting election results degrades the electorate’s trust in the institution of elections and the institutions of the US federal government.

Perhaps the Democrats should stop doing that?
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Abrams doesn’t routinely, and unprovoked, attack others personal appearance. When she does, she becomes fair game.

* But we all know she won’t.
Click to expand...

So since some liberals on here routinely, and unprovoked, attack others trumps appearance that makes them fair game then right.
 
marke said:
I believe Abrams could improve her poll numbers if she could get hold of whatever it is that gives AOC such a youthful innocent appearance.
Click to expand...

There's no doubt that AOC's looks have helped catapult her status and allow her to get away with being bat**** crazy.
 
Michael Cole said:
How does opposition to an apartied type society show a lack of respect for whites?
Click to expand...

this is why you have 0 credibility when you make statements like this.
no where in america do we have an apartheid type society.

you have no clue what you are talking about.
 
braindrain said:
So since some liberals on here routinely, and unprovoked, attack others trumps appearance that makes them fair game then right.
Click to expand...
Fine by me, but you might run into a problem with the mods.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom