'White People Shouldn't Exist', Declares Texas State University Newspaper

[worksforpigs]

What? A university student wrote an outrageous article promoting an over-the-top idea to stir up controversy?
You've been trolled, buddy, and you took the bait. "White is over, if you want it."? John Lennon is grinning in his grave.

Oh, and white isn't an American thing, it's European.

Would you have said that if the article was about getting rid of blacks or Jews?

 

[worksforpigs]

Would that same college newspaper have printed this if the subject were blacks or Muslims?

What do you think?

We wouldn't have the same ho-hum response from liberals like we're seeing on this thread, that's for sure.

 

[Grim17]

Now remove "white people" and put in "black people" and you will see what they have been living with for years.

Instead of stating the obvious that "racism is wrong" and therefore "the article is wrong", as myself and most reasonable would, you instead give the article justification.

Your statement clearly defines the flawed and hypocritical beliefs that you and so many other SJW's on the far left embrace. You claim to deplore racism and want it abolished, if not outlawed, from American society. In actuality the only racism you are against, is racism emanating from white people. You make it quite clear that racism targeting white people (such as the racism in that article in that college newspaper), is perfectly acceptable. You are outraged by any perceived racism toward minorities by white people and deem it "deplorable", but when it's displayed by non-white people, toward white people, you see it as "justified revenge" which you gladly condone.

People like myself condemn all racism and want to see it ended, because that's the only way our society will ever be able to come together and live in peace... Until people like yourself stop offering justification for certain types of racism and start condemning it in all forms, the racial divide in this country will continue to widen and things will only get worse.


.

 

[Mason66]

It is an opinion piece. Just a stupid, angsty, racist one.

A piece that was read by the editorial staff at this "paper" and approved as being worthy of print.

 

[TheGoverness]

A piece that was read by the editorial staff at this "paper" and approved as being worthy of print.

Sure.

 

[Slingshot Bob]

Look at that, the far right is wetting itself again over some random person's opinion. Who cares? Unlike the neo fascist groups and far right hatred, there's no one supporting any such hatred of whites in the US.

Better go firebomb so more churches to express your angst about "uppity" minorities again.

What about the black nurse fired over her tweet? You seriously believe no one in America hates whites?:shock:

 

[Mason66]

Sure.

I assume by your answer you think the author of this editorial wrote it, and printed it himself without showing it to anybody else.

Is that what you think?

 

[Grand Mal]

Would you have said that if the article was about getting rid of blacks or Jews?

Ohfercryingoutloud.

Wow. What a brilliant retort. I'm just stymied.
How come nobody else thought of that aspect of the controversy?

 

[TheGoverness]

What about the black nurse fired over her tweet? You seriously believe no one in America hates whites?:shock:

There are definitely people in America who have hatred towards whites. Thankfully, those people are in the minority.

 

[CLAX1911]

No but to be an attorney or a doctor, you need to graduate from college.

because of some arbitrary rules.

Why are you so against higher education?

I most certainly am not against higher education. I just don't buy that institutions are the only place to get it, or even the best place to get it.

How do you know that this is not the case, the majority of the time?

I don't but I didn't claim it wasn't. You made a claim that it was and it claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Most racist people I know have parents who are the exact same way.

anecdotes are not arguments.

Here's an article about racism being learned at an early age, but you may not want to read it. It's from Penn State - one of those useless institutes of higher education that you seem to have such a problem with.

https://sites.psu.edu/aspsy/2017/03/25/racism-is-learned-at-an-early-age/

I'm not interested in opinions.

 

[worksforpigs]

Ohfercryingoutloud.

Wow. What a brilliant retort. I'm just stymied.
How come nobody else thought of that aspect of the controversy?

Liberals certainly don't. They're so blinded by racial double-standards, they need a seeing eye dog.

 

[TheGoverness]

I assume by your answer you think the author of this editorial wrote it, and printed it himself without showing it to anybody else.

Is that what you think?

No. They obviously saw it. The editor, going by their explanation, just didn't have a problem with it at the time.

 

[CLAX1911]

It is not odd that a college student thinks that book learning has value in the real world.

When she graduates, she will find out that it doesn't.

Experience is the only thing that has value.

I was unaware that she was a college student. Thank you for making that point. I thought I knew so much when I graduated.

 

[Mason66]

No. They obviously saw it. The editor, going by their explanation, just didn't have a problem with it at the time.

Exactly, so it is not just this guy that has these ideas.

 

[Grand Mal]

Liberals certainly don't. They're so blinded by racial double-standards, they need a seeing eye dog.

You, on the other hand, see the world with crystal clarity, I bet. That's how you know all about liberals, right?

 

[Mason66]

I was unaware that she was a college student. Thank you for making that point. I thought I knew so much when I graduated.

She said earlier she is in her senior year, unless I read that wrong. That is always possible.

 

[Lursa]

This thread is doing a good job at exposing people who claim to support free speech but really only support it for their side. And that's not free speech.

It was the tone that got to me ("angry pre-teen tantrum"). Not one that I would take seriously no matter what...or who...the subject.

 

[worksforpigs]

There are definitely people in America who have hatred towards whites. Thankfully, those people are in the minority.

Mainstream liberalism is increasingly moving left and is as such taking on more anti-white racism in its ranks and in its rhetoric.

 

[worksforpigs]

You, on the other hand, see the world with crystal clarity, I bet. That's how you know all about liberals, right?

As a former liberal, I learned the hard way about the moral double standards and selective outrages of the political left. It first caused me disillusionment which eventually caused me to abandon the left.

One thing you haven't done here is deny what I said.

 

[Grand Mal]

As a former liberal, I learned the hard way about the moral double standards and selective outrages of the political left. It first caused me disillusionment which eventually caused me to abandon the left.

One thing you haven't done here is deny what I said.

Deny what? That liberals have racial double standards? I don't respond to that kind of crap. As for your question, yes, I would respond the same if the article was about black people. It's so sophomoric and obviously, deliberately inflammatory that anyone who gets their dander up over it is probably one notch lower on the IQ scale than the twerp who wrote it.

Here's a question for you, one I put to someone else here. What if the article was about how great white people are, sang the praises of the white race and said white people were the best accomplishment of evolution. Would you hate the article as much?

 

[worksforpigs]

Deny what? That liberals have racial double standards? I don't respond to that kind of crap. As for your question, yes, I would respond the same if the article was about black people. It's so sophomoric and obviously, deliberately inflammatory that anyone who gets their dander up over it is probably one notch lower on the IQ scale than the twerp who wrote it.

Here's a question for you, one I put to someone else here. What if the article was about how great white people are, sang the praises of the white race and said white people were the best accomplishment of evolution. Would you hate the article as much?

How does praising a group equal calling their DNA an abomination and blaming them for all the evils in the world?

Yes, liberals have racial double-standards. That's why they protest alleged hate crimes against blacks but never show up when whites are murdered over their race. No human rights marches, no vigils, no community leaders leading protests.

 

[Slingshot Bob]

There are definitely people in America who have hatred towards whites. Thankfully, those people are in the minority.

I found it hard to believe, anyone could say or believe that. Every group has their racist.

 

[CLAX1911]

She said earlier she is in her senior year, unless I read that wrong. That is always possible.

I haven't noticed.

 

[Grand Mal]

How does praising a group equal calling their DNA an abomination and blaming them for all the evils in the world?

You're joking, right? I mean, you asked a 'what if...?' question of me, so you do know what the words mean. Right?
So, what if the article was praising white people? Would you still hate it as much?

Yes, liberals have racial double-standards. That's why they protest alleged hate crimes against blacks but never show up when whites are murdered over their race. No human rights marches, no vigils, no community leaders leading protests.

Right now, as it stands, I'm saying the odds are about even that you don't know what 'liberal' means. And, are you saying conservatives march and hold vigils and protest when white people are murdered? Is that why conservatives are better, fairer, than liberals?

 

[Tigerace117]

Do you condone the article?

No, unlike those on the far right I do not support the concept of genocide. However, this is not a serious call for any such thing, so the wails of "the liberals are coming to kill us all" is rather nonsensical.