White House backs Stephen Miller amid white nationalist emails

[Felis Leo]

Miller references things like the website VDARE and the book "The Camp of the Saints". Do yourself a favor and scroll through VDARE and read reviews of "The Camp of the Saints". They both peddle in the Great Replacement conspiracy theory which is the bedrock of white nationalism.

I would need to see the emails and references. I have never heard of VDARE nor of "The Camp of the Saints," and, again, I am not given to trust SPLC's characterization of them.

 

[Felis Leo]

You do not need to trust the SPLC. You can look up the sources that Miller references in his emails. I have not heard Miller loudly proclaiming that he is a white nationalist, but if the source of his opinions are rooted in white nationalism it is nearly impossible to avoid having the label applied to him. I think it's ridiculous to act like someone's words are more important than their actions, but that seems to be what you are trying to say.

Absolutely true, but then it must be asked: What are his governmental actions that would lead one to proclaiming that he acts as a white nationalist would act that is different from how a non-white nationalist government would act?

 

[Felis Leo]

His own family says that he is a bigot and a hypocrite.

Stephen Miller's Uncle: 'Dozens' of Family Members Hate Him Too

Why should I take an estranged uncle's opinion as dispositive of Miller's views and character? If your estranged conservative uncle came out saying that you were a piece of garbage, should his opinion have any sway about who you are as a person?

 

[What if...?]

SPLC?

Who would quote any claim from this racist alt-left Progressive operation?

Who cares about evidence.

All that matters is bias!

We really need to start screening cops to weed out the anti-criminal biased.

 

[What if...?]

This is an oxymoron. He Jewish American with a strong sense of nationalism and loyalty to his country. He's just a regular nationalist which used sources that you people consider to be questionable.

You people are so full of ****, it's not even funny anymore.

With a focus on non-white folks.

Nothing racist about it.

 

[What if...?]

No, not really.



The government of White majority countries are well aware that their immigration polices are contributing to the decline of the white majority of their counties. They just don't care.

In a sense, we are being replaced and the governments are complicit in it.

You're actually being absorbed because you couldn't keep the laws against miscegenation on the books.

Diluted. Mixed.

Its the future of the species.

Deal with it.

 

[What if...?]

I would need to see the emails and references. I have never heard of VDARE nor of "The Camp of the Saints," and, again, I am not given to trust SPLC's characterization of them.

Yet you are on a computer right now.

You could look for yourself.

But it's easier to reject the source.

That won't disturb your comfortable bubble.

 

[What if...?]

Why should I take an estranged uncle's opinion as dispositive of Miller's views and character? If your estranged conservative uncle came out saying that you were a piece of garbage, should his opinion have any sway about who you are as a person?

Depends on whether or not you are a piece of garbage, actually.

He would have delivered an accurate assessment if you are.

Slandered you if you aren't.

 

[ecofarm]

This is an oxymoron. He Jewish American with a strong sense of nationalism and loyalty to his country. He's just a regular nationalist which used sources that you people consider to be questionable.

You people are so full of ****, it's not even funny anymore.

Are you defending Miller or white nationalism? Haha.

 

[Felis Leo]

Yet you are on a computer right now.

You could look for yourself.

But it's easier to reject the source.

That won't disturb your comfortable bubble.

I did. Most of the characterization of both VDARE and "The Camp of the Saints" as racist came from the Southern Poverty Law Center. And, again, I do not trust the judgment of the Southern Poverty Law Center as an authority on racism, irrespective of their past work. Now, I do not care to peruse VDARE to find racist content, but if you have handy links to articles that you believe show that they are clearly a white supremacist organization I am happy to look at them. Nor do I have the time to read some French novel from the 1970s. But if you read it, I would ask that you please tell me what you found racist about the book?

 

[Felis Leo]

Depends on whether or not you are a piece of garbage, actually.

He would have delivered an accurate assessment if you are.

Slandered you if you aren't.

Well that is certainly tautological. I have not been given any evidence as to why I should take Stephen Miller's uncle's opinion about his nephew's character seriously, other than it is just oh-so-juicy to listen to one family member attacking another family member.

 

[maxparrish]

I suspect the totality of this thread can be reduced to:

Stephen Miller is a scumbag.
How do I know? Cause Millers Uncle says he is a scumbag.
How do I know his Uncle is right? Cause Stephen Miller is a scumbag, according to his Uncle.

Exactly how long does one tolerate idiotic circular arguments?

 

[ocean515]

Who cares about evidence.

All that matters is bias!

We really need to start screening cops to weed out the anti-criminal biased.

All that matters is bias.

No doubt the internal mission statement of the SPLC money launderers.

 

[maxparrish]

Yet you are on a computer right now.

You could look for yourself.

But it's easier to reject the source.

That won't disturb your comfortable bubble.

"The primary sources" are the emails and the source articles provided by Miller, the "opinion" of the source is the non-profit racket known as the SPLC.

My opinion is not based on their opinion, nor should yours. You can think for yourself, I assume?

To that end, I looked at one Miller source of "controversy", some typical articles at Vdare:

LATEST

Article
2019-11-15
John Derbyshire Asks: Switzerland Smells The Coffee. Why Can’t We?

2019-11-15
Radio Derb: Impeachment Embarassment, Swiss Preparedness, Demography News, And Popeye's Sandwich Wars, Etc

Post
2019-11-15
Jamelle Bouie In The NYT: "Stephen Miller’s Sinister Syllabus"

Post
2019-11-15
What the NYT Thought of Refugees Back When Immigrants Were Rightwingers (I. E. Refugees From Communism)

Post
2019-11-15
Michelle Malkin Calls For An Immigration Moratorium On Demographic Grounds, Saying "Do The Math!"

Apparently if you tend to agree with any of these articles, especially the notorious one by "racist" Malkin (from the Philippines no less) then YOU are just a horrible person - a racist...racist...racist...right?

 

[Lisa]

Perhaps. They are not even aware the SPLC is a money laundering operation for Progressive agitators.

How does the SPLC launder money? They aren't a bank or the Trump foundation.

 

[ocean515]

How does the SPLC launder money? They aren't a bank or the Trump foundation.

Southern Poverty Law Center transferred millions to offshore tax havens: Report - Washington Times

The SPLC holds $328 million in net assets and raised more than $50 million in contributions in 2015 despite spending just $61,000 on legal services.
“It’s a totally fake organization,” said Fox News host Tucker Carlson in a Thursday night segment on the report.​

Southern Poverty Law Center Has More Than $90 Million In Offshore Funds

The controversial organization reported $477 million in total assets and $132 million in contributions on its most recent tax forms, which cover Nov. 1, 2016 to Oct. 31, 2017. That represents an increase of $140 million in its total assets from the previous year. Millions flowed to the group following the deadly Charlottesville, Va. attacks from employees at companies including JP Morgan Chase and Apple as well as from actors such as George Clooney.​

 

[JustHanging]

Southern Poverty Law Center transferred millions to offshore tax havens: Report - Washington Times

The SPLC holds $328 million in net assets and raised more than $50 million in contributions in 2015 despite spending just $61,000 on legal services.
“It’s a totally fake organization,” said Fox News host Tucker Carlson in a Thursday night segment on the report.​

Southern Poverty Law Center Has More Than $90 Million In Offshore Funds

The controversial organization reported $477 million in total assets and $132 million in contributions on its most recent tax forms, which cover Nov. 1, 2016 to Oct. 31, 2017. That represents an increase of $140 million in its total assets from the previous year. Millions flowed to the group following the deadly Charlottesville, Va. attacks from employees at companies including JP Morgan Chase and Apple as well as from actors such as George Clooney.​

That's not money laundering. Are you just parroting what you've been told to think? Oh, Tucker Carlson, yeah, you are.

Fact-checking Tucker Carlson’s false claim about the testimony of former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine | PolitiFact
Our ruling
Carlson said Yovanovitch claimed under oath that she never personally responded to an email from a Democratic staffer. But "in fact, it turns out that she did respond."

Yovanovitch, based on the transcript that Carlson and others have access to, made no such claim. Yovanovitch never said she didn’t respond to the staffer. Yovanovitch did say she did not respond to a second email. But she alluded to replying to an initial email.

We rate Carlson’s claim False.

 

[Craig234]

Miller has no place in government, and exposes the truth about trump's sharing his white supremacists views, but somewhat hiding them/being dishonest about them. His very continued presence as a top trump adviser shows who trump is, and people who support trump keeping Miller show who they are.

 

[ocean515]

That's not money laundering. Are you just parroting what you've been told to think? Oh, Tucker Carlson, yeah, you are.

Fact-checking Tucker Carlson’s false claim about the testimony of former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine | PolitiFact
Our ruling
Carlson said Yovanovitch claimed under oath that she never personally responded to an email from a Democratic staffer. But "in fact, it turns out that she did respond."

Yovanovitch, based on the transcript that Carlson and others have access to, made no such claim. Yovanovitch never said she didn’t respond to the staffer. Yovanovitch did say she did not respond to a second email. But she alluded to replying to an initial email.

We rate Carlson’s claim False.

Of course it is.

BTW, Politifact is a far left Progressive operation, just like the SPLC.

Only indoctrinated fools think Politifact is something to ever quote.

 

[j brown's body]

Why should I take an estranged uncle's opinion as dispositive of Miller's views and character? If your estranged conservative uncle came out saying that you were a piece of garbage, should his opinion have any sway about who you are as a person?

Your dismissing it indicates that you are unable to deal with it.

 

[j brown's body]

Of course it is.

BTW, Politifact is a far left Progressive operation, just like the SPLC.

Only indoctrinated fools think Politifact is something to ever quote.

Infowars is the best source for facts. And Breitbart.

 

[j brown's body]

This is an oxymoron. He Jewish American with a strong sense of nationalism and loyalty to his country. He's just a regular nationalist which used sources that you people consider to be questionable.

You people are so full of ****, it's not even funny anymore.

He is an oxymoron. Nationalism led to the murder of 6 million Jews.

 

[ocean515]

Infowars is the best source for facts. And Breitbart.

Never use them.

PolitiFact is cut from the same cloth as Infowars and Breitbart.

Explains why so many socialist Progressives flock to it.