• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whistleblower tentatively agrees to testify, attorneys say, as long as they get appropriate clearanc

Hatuey said:
Let me guess, you weren't biased in your review of Trump's evidencd? Is that what we are supposed to believe here? Not like you held this opinion before or after the transcript was given out. Right?

Don't be coy, we are all friends and I don't have time for shy women.

Serious though. Is there a transcript version that could be produced by the WH that would have changed your mind when you have held an opinion before any evidence was even provided? The answer to anyone who comes across any of your last 100 posts on the subject is clear.

Again, the lie here is that the Trump impeachment would be just like the Clinton one. I don't remember the Clintons calling up the Canadians or abyone to help him beat whatever cuck GOPs sent his way like Trump admitted he would do if the opportunity was there.

Again, let's follow along, see where it all goes.



Sent from the Matrioshka in the WH Christmas tree.
Click to expand...

Sometimes I wonder why I keep giving you second chances.
Pay attention to what I wrote, and stop embellishing my words.

I don't do it to you so why you think you can pull this babyish, dishonest nonsense with me defies logic.
 
trixare4kids said:
That's not what I said.
Way to keep the discussion honest.
Click to expand...
Your posts say differently. there is literally nothing he could do, nothing that would make you not defend him. Let’s see where this all goes. If it’s a nothing burger, cool. If it’s true then he crossed the line and he should be impeached. Then there’s the matter of the second whistleblower, that should be interesting. I’m sure somebody will be posting a thread about it shortly.
 
Captain Adverse said:
"Lying about getting a …..?" I guess you are referring to Bill Clinton?

I opposed all those Republican attempts to impeach Clinton for the same reasons I oppose the current efforts to impeach Trump. It was all partisan politics, and a desperate desire to impede a seated Administration's efforts to effect policy.

I did not like the Republicans doing it back then, and I do not like what the Democrats are doing now.
Click to expand...

Oh, you are clearly far more interested in playing partisan games here. Don't kid yourself. What occurred in 1999 was absolutely partisan and based on a technicality after the GOP put Clinton in an impossible situation. It was to simply admit that he cheated to the whole world, or lie about it to Congress. And that is what they got him on, not the cheating.

What is happening now involves a very real betrayal of trust on the international stage, in which Trump has freely offered up his own evidence. We have here a seated President who obviously sought to employ a foreign government's assistance in harming American citizens for his own political gain in a future election. It involves national security and the security of our allies in the face of an enemy, in which even Trump's 2017 National Security Strategy declares. This is treachery. And this is merely the latest performance from this piece of ****.

Pretending that the two are anywhere near the same ball park is dishonest. The only thing partisan about this is the Conservative mindset to callously dismiss the obvious. But as I have noted again and again, you people have traveled down a path of extreme partisanship for so long that you imagine that everyone is playing the same game. Cheaters, liars, and thieves simply assume that "everybody does it," thus they legitimize their own behavior. And the sad thing is that some Conservatives, thanks to their personal needs to dismiss the world as "fake news" when convenient, really can't even tell between fact and fiction anymore.
 
Last edited:
trixare4kids said:
Sometimes I wonder why I keep giving you second chances.
Pay attention to what I wrote, and stop embellishing my words.

I don't do it to you so why you think you can pull this babyish nonsense with me defies logic.
Click to expand...
Nobody has embellished your words. I told you the same thing I tried to tell Captain Adverse in terms that would be misunderstood even by someone more intelligent than you. My mistake, I'll use smaller words:

This has absolutely no comparison to the Clinton impeachment. There is no blowjob at the end of the tunnel. It is about what we are willing to accept from presidents.

Please, follow along.

Sent from the Matrioshka in the WH Christmas tree.
 
HenryChinaski said:
Your posts say differently. there is literally nothing he could do, nothing that would make you not defend him. Let’s see where this all goes. If it’s a nothing burger, cool. If it’s true then he crossed the line and he should be impeached. Then there’s the matter of the second whistleblower, that should be interesting. I’m sure somebody will be posting a thread about it shortly.
Click to expand...

Stop lying.
You're boring me silly.

How would you like me to say you do not have an open mind after you wrote that you will wait and see where this goes? I said, I don't think there is a there there. That denotes an opinion and not a fact.

I know nothing about a second whistleblower... a second call to Zelensky, yes.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Short answer? Probably not.

How many times has some group of true believers said "this is the thing that will finally bring down Trump!" only to find it was much (made intentionally to stir up emotions) ado about nothing?

I usually try to wait and see how it all comes out. So far, as expected, it was either a complete nothing or a minor bump in the road easily run over or moved around. :shrug:
Click to expand...

interestingly, one would think a libertarian would be 100% against this presidential corruption.
 
I'm interested in hearing the whistle blower's testimony and the tapes of the conversations in question to get a full sense of the issue at hand.
 
Barnacle said:
His lawyers have started a go-fund-me page for him ...
Click to expand...

Maybe he'll hit the jackpot like Blasey Ford. Maybe he can get flown around in some mega-wealthy Silicon Valley Gulfstream, too.
 
trixare4kids said:
Stop lying.
You're boring me silly.
Click to expand...
This is probably the most intellectually honest post you will write in this thread. We get it. People like the Clintons are why you stopped being a Democrat, and why you became a Republican agenda defender, like Trump.

This is still not about that, it's about a president working with a foreign government against a citizen in his interest and not the country's.



Sent from the Matrioshka in the WH Christmas tree.
 
i bet a whole bunch of Trump supporters wanna cry tonight.



original.jpg
 
Oh! Acadia and Barnacle are here.

I bet they looked at this reeeeaaally objectively and in an unbiased manner before they decided Trump was right and liberals were dumb.

The edge lord radar is going off. All we are missing are a black guy, and maybe a gay Republican.



Sent from the Matrioshka in the WH Christmas tree.
 
HenryChinaski said:
This is the response of someone that doesn’t have a response.
Click to expand...

Was there a reason you snipped the rest of my post?

Too deep for you that YOU were unable to respond?
Your irony.

Have fun on your stupid thread.
 
trixare4kids said:
I follow you, I simply don't think there is any there there in that call.
The Democrats don't give a crap about corruption. They're as corrupt as it gets. They care about lost power and will accuse Trump of crimes just as they have been doing since the day he was elected.
Click to expand...

Yes, you absolutely do. You are not stupid.

And when you follow up the obtuse shtick with a default about "corrupt" Democrats, you clearly show this. An attempt to deflect so that you can display for us your seething irrational hatred for the left is all you give a damn about. And loss of power? Perhaps you missed the part in 2018 when Democrats took the House back. Or perhaps you missed the years of documented cases where the GOP was caught over and over again across the country rigging elections so that they can get back to power. You see, with the GOP needing the Electoral College to get to the White House since the year 2000, it's not the Democratic Party that is out of touch with majority of the American people. It's the GOP and their legion of constituent fossils.

But, sure, go ahead and pretend that what the entire world sees in that call isn't obvious to you. I doubt at this point you can even fool yourself anymore.
 
first question...who told you?

next question....we're done here.

next question.. subpoena the leaker
 
MSgt said:
Yes, you absolutely do. You are not stupid.

And when you follow up the obtuse shtick with a default about "corrupt" Democrats, you clearly show this. An attempt to deflect so that you can display for us your seething irrational hatred for the left is all you give a damn about. And loss of power? Perhaps you missed the part in 2018 when Democrats took the House back. Or perhaps you missed the years of documented cases where the GOP was caught over and over again across the country rigging elections so that they can get back to power. You see, with the GOP needing the Electoral College to get to the White House since the year 2000, it's not the Democratic Party that is out of touch with majority of the American people. It's the GOP and their legion of constituent fossils.

But, sure, go ahead and pretend that what the entire world sees in that call isn't obvious to you. I doubt at this point you can even fool yourself anymore.
Click to expand...

Are you for real?
Go to the gym if you need a punching bag.
I'm not angry. Mirror?
 
Trump said:
first question...who told you?

next question....we're done here.

next question.. subpoena the leaker
Click to expand...

If "we're done here"... feel free to piss off.
 
trixare4kids said:
Was there a reason you snipped the rest of my post?

Too deep for you that YOU were unable to respond?
Your irony.

Have fun on your stupid thread.
Click to expand...
“Snipped the rest of your post”? You’re Lying. You responded to my post with a non-answer now here we are
:lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom