• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When Leahy is the Youngest Yet to Talk...

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,849
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
We need term limits bad.

PL: age-78

Hatch and Grassley: 84
Feinstein: 85

Seriously. This is not good.

I hate to sound ageist, but come on. Mid-80's for your average senator on the Judicial committee is ridiculous.

Three Terms for senators, max.

While we are at it, we need max 18 year term limits on SCOTUS judges as well.
 
We need term limits bad.

PL: age-78

Hatch and Grassley: 84
Feinstein: 85

Seriously. This is not good.

I hate to sound ageist, but come on. Mid-80's for your average senator on the Judicial committee is ridiculous.

Three Terms for senators, max.

While we are at it, we need max 18 year term limits on SCOTUS judges as well.

The Kavanaugh hearing is currently descending into a farce because the republicans on the committee are breaking norms and precedents at a alarming rate just to ram through a justice that no one has had time to properly vet.


And the big crisis in your mind is the age of the senators on the committee?
 
The Kavanaugh hearing is currently descending into a farce because the republicans on the committee are breaking norms and precedents at a alarming rate just to ram through a justice that no one has had time to properly vet.


And the big crisis in your mind is the age of the senators on the committee?

He made a point and I'm inclined to agree.

Unfortunately there appears to also be some rule breaking:

GRASSLEY: “Good morning. I welcome everyone to this confirmation hearing on the nomination of —“
HARRIS: “Mr. Chairman.”
GRASSLEY: “— Brett Kavanaugh --”
HARRIS: “Mr. Chairman.”
GRASSLEY: “— to serve as associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.”
HARRIS: “Mr. Chairman, I’d like to be recognized for a question before we proceed. Mr. Chairman, I’d like to be recognized to ask a question before we proceed. The committee received just last night less than 15 hours ago —“
HARRIS: “Mr. Chairman, regular order.”
HARRIS: “— 42.000 pages of documents that we have not had an opportunity to review or read or analyze."
GRASSLEY: “You are out of order. I will proceed.”
HARRIS: “We cannot possibly move forward, Mr. Chairman. We have not been given the opportunity to have a meaningful hearing with Congress nominee--"[cross-talk]
GRASSLEY: “I extend a very warm welcome to Judge Kavanaugh, to his wife Ashley, their two daughters --[cross-talk]
UNKNOWN: “Mr. Chairman, I agree with my colleague, senator Harris. Mr. Chairman, we received 42.000 documents tat we haven't been able to review —"
GRASSLEY: “— And everyone else joining us today."
UNKNOWN: " and we believe this hearing should be postponed —"
GRASSLEY: “I know this is an exciting day for all of you here and your you’re rightly proud —"
UNKNOWN: "Mr. Chairman, if we cannot be recognized I move to adjourn. Mr. Chairman, I move to adjourn."
GRASSLEY: “— From Judge Kavanaugh —"
UNKNOWN: "Mr. Chairman, I move to adjourn. Mr. Chairman, we have been denied real access to the documents we need to advise —" (Audience cheering)
BLUMENTHAL: "Mr. Chairman, we have been denied the real access to the documents we need ---[cross-talk] which turns this hearing into a charade and a mockery of our norms and, Mr. Chairman, I therefore move to adjourn this hearing."
AUDIENCE: "This is a mockery. This is a travesty of justice. Cancel Brett Kavanaugh, adjourn the hearing. [ indecipherable]."
BLUMENTHAL: "Mr. Chairman, I ask for a roll call vote on my motion to adjourn."
AUDIENCE MEMBER: "'[indecipherable]'"
GRASSLEY: “Okay."
BLUMENTHAL: "Mr. Chairman, I move to adjourn. I ask for a roll call vote."
GRASSLEY: “We are not in executive session. We will continue as planned."
 
Senator Grassley should clear the room. Of protestors and of every single Senator who interrupts him.
 
The Kavanaugh hearing is currently descending into a farce because the republicans on the committee are breaking norms and precedents at a alarming rate just to ram through a justice that no one has had time to properly vet.


And the big crisis in your mind is the age of the senators on the committee?
Dems can't stop Kavanaugh. There is no story there.

So, I found one.
 
Senator Grassley should clear the room. Of protestors and of every single Senator who interrupts him.

Why? Are you afraid to face the fact that the country is flying apart like one of those cartoon bombs.

Oh wait. You still believe Obama was "divisive."
 
Why? Are you afraid to face the fact that the country is flying apart like one of those cartoon bombs.

Oh wait. You still believe Obama was "divisive."

Of course he was! How do you think we got to where we are now! Are you watching this morning? Don’t democrats and their followers make you proud?
 
It was democrats who chose the path of “resistance” led by Obama, Schumer, and Mrs. Polosi!
 
It was democrats who chose the path of “resistance” led by Obama, Schumer, and Mrs. Polosi!

Nonsense. Obama never led anything. That was the ****ing problem. I actually agreed with the Righties on that issue.

Now you all want to pretend that Obama is this great organizer of "the resistance." :lol:
 
Nonsense. Obama never led anything. That was the ****ing problem. I actually agreed with the Righties on that issue.

Now you all want to pretend that Obama is this great organizer of "the resistance." :lol:

Of course he is! He is so very busy trying to protect his legacy!
 
Of course he is! He is so very busy trying to protect his legacy!

:lamo

Trump is doing that for him. Trust me there.

The amazing thing is Trump has single handily restored W to one of the two greatest presidents of the 21st century.
 
:lamo

Trump is doing that for him. Trust me there.

The amazing thing is Trump has single handily restored W to one of the two greatest presidents of the 21st century.

You are entitled to an opinion. But, you are wrong as you on the left so often are! Not even worthy of a discussion!
 
We need term limits bad.

PL: age-78

Hatch and Grassley: 84
Feinstein: 85

Seriously. This is not good.

I hate to sound ageist, but come on. Mid-80's for your average senator on the Judicial committee is ridiculous.

Three Terms for senators, max.

While we are at it, we need max 18 year term limits on SCOTUS judges as well.


I can't believe i'm about to do this, but here it goes:

I..this...hurts....AGREE with you!

There...got through it without too much pain.

Anyway...I think there should be an age limit at least.
 
Back
Top Bottom