- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 120,433
- Reaction score
- 76,528
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Asked early in the thread, before any OP perturbation:
Again, very worthwhile to explore in a discussion on ethics, yet was abandoned.
I'm perfectly fine with acknowledging that pregnancy carries a certain degree of risk, yet according to your own source, abortion is no less risky. This makes pregnancy risk (in itself) moot when it comes to justifying abortion.
Yes, they said pregnancy is safe...like driving in cars is safe...which carries a very large risk, doesnt it?
It's not a moot point at all. Another point to be made would be that nobody forces anyone to drive in cars. But you are advocating for a demand that women take significant risks against their will. (And it said abortion was much more, 14 times more, safe.)
How do you justify that in your ethical perspective?
Again, very worthwhile to explore in a discussion on ethics, yet was abandoned.