• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What's more important to investigate, leaks or Russian's hacking of elections?

ReverendHellh0und said:
I read you just fine. please if you want to run away, just do so.
Click to expand...

Nah... I would never "run away" from someone who so clearly needs my help. ;)

If you are reading "just fine" then why are you asking me questions that have no relation to what I wrote?
 
independentusa said:
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
Click to expand...

Well, Obama already decided to investigate the Trump campaign. That's where the information in the leaks came from.
 
independentusa said:
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
Click to expand...
Yeah, when in a jam, the guilty aim to distract.


"Look over there...a leak."
 
calamity said:
Yeah, when in a jam, the guilty aim to distract.


"Look over there...a leak."
Click to expand...

You know that makes absolutely no sense, right? Ok, maybe you don't. Here, that makes absolutely no sense.
 
RickJames3000 said:
Nah... I would never "run away" from someone who so clearly needs my help. ;)

If you are reading "just fine" then why are you asking me questions that have no relation to what I wrote?
Click to expand...




You ran away when you stopped (as if you started) intellectually discussing the topic. dunno what to tell you. *shrug*
 
RickJames3000 said:
Sounds about right. Why bother saying anything at all?
Click to expand...



okie dokie. I think like haymarket I need to introduce a quota with you. The way it works, is if you insist on ignoring the topic for this sort of stupidity, you will use up your quota and will not be responded to for the day.


You have reached that quota. Have a wonderful day.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
okie dokie. I think like haymarket I need to introduce a quota with you. The way it works, is if you insist on ignoring the topic for this sort of stupidity, you will use up your quota and will not be responded to for the day.


You have reached that quota. Have a wonderful day.
Click to expand...

Awesome. Please do. It will give you something constructive to focus on, rather than your usual foolishness!;)
 
independentusa said:
So basically you are saying that it is more important to investigate the leaks rather than the Russians interference in our elections and the Trump peoples possible involvment. I am not commenting, just clarifying.
Click to expand...



Russia intefered with the private entity known as the Democrat party.


The leaks here were by intelligence employees, which is a violation of US law and undermines national security.
 
RickJames3000 said:
Sure... they are called "conspiracy theories".
Click to expand...

That's ironic. Because it is the 'Russians interfered in our elections' that has been blown into a giant conspiracy theory. The leaks are not a theory. They actually happened. They were done by someone in the intel community. That is treasonous.
 
independentusa said:
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
Click to expand...


EVERYTHING needs to be investigated; leave no stone unturned.
 
So you are saying that if someone in the government knows about wrong doing and they spill the beans, they should be prosecuted for doing so? Wouldn't that allow wrong doing to go on and the fear of prosecution to anyone that is willing to stand up to the wrong doing?
 
Was this presidnet elected or helped to be elected by a foriegn government? And did this preadient and his people aid the foreign government? What more serious questions could be asked?
 
In political Terms it means distract. Should I explain?
 
They hacked the private entity, but the reason for the attack is the more serious for our country and our democracy than leaks, to interfere with our elections. That is much more serious than leaks which happen all of the time in our government.
 
RickJames3000 said:
Like I said... there is a proper order to things. A full investigation of Trump and his campaign's ties to Russia will expose all sources.
You should be arguing for that.
Click to expand...

I am albeit not exposure to the general public.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom