• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What no one is mentioning about the Mueller Report to still protect Hilary Clinton

joko104

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
65,981
Reaction score
23,408
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
No one is mentioning that the Mueller report found that Hilary Clinton's "recklessness" and violating national security laws with an unsecure server resulted in Russia hacking her email account, which according to Comey had national security secrets. Her violation of law resulting in Russia (and who knows who else) learning American national security secrets.

Hilary Clinton violating federal law put national security secrets into the hands of Russia. That is huge, yet no one mentions that fact. Why? To keep protecting Hilary Clinton?
 
No one is mentioning that the Mueller report found that Hilary Clinton's "recklessness" and violating national security laws with an unsecure server resulted in Russia hacking her email account, which according to Comey had national security secrets. Her violation of law resulting in Russia (and who knows who else) learning American national security secrets.

Hilary Clinton violating federal law put national security secrets into the hands of Russia. That is huge, yet no one mentions that fact. Why? To keep protecting Hilary Clinton?

I don't know, why don't you ask the Trump PICKED DoJ head and Trump himself? Or it could be that your comments are just BS and Hillary isn't guilty of what you are accusing her of. Take your pick Joko.
 
No one is mentioning that the Mueller report found that Hilary Clinton's "recklessness" and violating national security laws with an unsecure server resulted in Russia hacking her email account, which according to Comey had national security secrets. Her violation of law resulting in Russia (and who knows who else) learning American national security secrets.

Hilary Clinton violating federal law put national security secrets into the hands of Russia. That is huge, yet no one mentions that fact. Why? To keep protecting Hilary Clinton?

You must have missed Lindsay Graham and the other morons bringing up Clinton again over the weekend. Nobody cares about her except the people who can't stop obsessing about her (like you).

She was exonerated by the FBI and DOJ a few years ago. Time for you to move on.
 
No one is mentioning that the Mueller report found that Hilary Clinton's "recklessness" and violating national security laws with an unsecure server resulted in Russia hacking her email account
This is a lie. No where in anything Mueller has ever filed has this been alleged.

Russia hacked the DNC, not Clinton's personal server. Russia phished Podesta, not Clinton's server. After Trump, who was in active negotiations for Trump Tower Moscow, stood on stage and asked Russia to find Clinton's "missing" emails, Russia immediately began TRYING to hack Clinton campaign servers. Mueller's statements never said whether they were successful, but it still wasn't Clinton's personal email server.

Why is no one mentioning it? Because it is a lie and never happened.
I don't know, why don't you ask the Trump PICKED DoJ head and Trump himself? Or it could be that your comments are just BS and Hillary isn't guilty of what you are accusing her of. Take your pick Joko.
You must have missed Lindsay Graham and the other morons bringing up Clinton again over the weekend. Nobody cares about her except the people who can't stop obsessing about her (like you).

She was exonerated by the FBI and DOJ a few years ago. Time for you to move on.
Joko's post is 100% false. Do not give it credit, just call it out for the lie it is.
 
You must have missed Lindsay Graham and the other morons bringing up Clinton again over the weekend. Nobody cares about her except the people who can't stop obsessing about her (like you).

She was exonerated by the FBI and DOJ a few years ago. Time for you to move on.

That's our issue, and yours as well.


You see, there is a perception that the wealthy and powerful in this country aren't beholden to the rule of law like the rest of us little people.

Are you not gonna be filled with rage if, 2 months from now, the report is made public, and its revealed that Trump and co broke several laws but were ultimately not held fully accountable?

I know I will be.
 
You must have missed Lindsay Graham and the other morons bringing up Clinton again over the weekend. Nobody cares about her except the people who can't stop obsessing about her (like you).

She was exonerated by the FBI and DOJ a few years ago. Time for you to move on.

Who, exactly, in the DOJ "exonerated" Hillary? IIRC, Comey played that role so that Lynch could remain silent on the matter.
 
Who, exactly, in the DOJ "exonerated" Hillary? IIRC, Comey played that role so that Lynch could remain silent on the matter.
Do not fall for the falsehoods in the OP. The opening post is 100% false.

And, to answer the question, Clinton was not exonerated.
 
Do not fall for the falsehoods in the OP. The opening post is 100% false.

And, to answer the question, Clinton was not exonerated.

Note that I did not reply to the OP, which I agree is 100% BS. Clinton was effectively exonerated since the DOJ took no action to indict/prosecute her.
 
That's our issue, and yours as well.


You see, there is a perception that the wealthy and powerful in this country aren't beholden to the rule of law like the rest of us little people.

Are you not gonna be filled with rage if, 2 months from now, the report is made public, and its revealed that Trump and co broke several laws but were ultimately not held fully accountable?

I know I will be.

I didn't know I had an issue. What is it?

I'm never filled with rage. It's politics. I don't like things, but my life is too interesting, busy and complicated to be filled with rage about things that don't impact me and I can't control
 
No one is mentioning it because it is a figment of the OP's imagination.

This should be in the conspiracy theory sub forum.
 
You must have missed Lindsay Graham and the other morons bringing up Clinton again over the weekend. Nobody cares about her except the people who can't stop obsessing about her (like you).

She was exonerated by the FBI and DOJ a few years ago. Time for you to move on.

*She was exonerated by the FBI and DOJ a few years ago. Time for you to move on.*

Yeah, Comey said she didn't "intend" to break the law. But she did and that private email server set it self up all by it's lonesome.
 
James Comey from the FBI. Loretta Lynch from the DOJ.

Perhaps you can supply (a link to) an official statement made by Lynch on the matter. I certainly do not recall that being done.

On July 1, 2016, the New York Times reported in the name of a "Justice Department official" that Attorney General Loretta Lynch will accept "whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton's personal email server."

According to Comey's June 8, 2017, testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch had asked him to downplay the investigation into Clinton's emails by calling it a "matter" rather than an investigation. He said the request "confused and concerned" him. He added that Lynch's tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton also influenced his decision to publicly announce the results of the FBI probe.

On June 23, 2017, several members of the Senate Judiciary Committee opened a bipartisan inquiry into whether former Attorney General Lynch interfered in the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server.

Hillary Clinton email controversy - Wikipedia
 
*She was exonerated by the FBI and DOJ a few years ago. Time for you to move on.*

Yeah, Comey said she didn't "intend" to break the law. But she did and that private email server set it self up all by it's lonesome.

Yes, she was effectively exonerated by Comey. That's what I said.
 
No one is mentioning that the Mueller report found that Hilary Clinton's "recklessness" and violating national security laws with an unsecure server resulted in Russia hacking her email account, which according to Comey had national security secrets. Her violation of law resulting in Russia (and who knows who else) learning American national security secrets.

Hilary Clinton violating federal law put national security secrets into the hands of Russia. That is huge, yet no one mentions that fact. Why? To keep protecting Hilary Clinton?

*put national security secrets into the hands of Russia.*

That's a complete unknown, a least in the public realm.
 
You must have missed Lindsay Graham and the other morons bringing up Clinton again over the weekend. Nobody cares about her except the people who can't stop obsessing about her (like you).

She was exonerated by the FBI and DOJ a few years ago. Time for you to move on.

At least you admit you don't care about Russian collusion or Russia and it all just an anti-Trump act.
 
*She was exonerated by the FBI and DOJ a few years ago. Time for you to move on.*

Yeah, Comey said she didn't "intend" to break the law. But she did and that private email server set it self up all by it's lonesome.

Which is an important distinction since the statute in question has only ever been used to prosecute people who A) take classified material they are not authorized to be in possession of with the intention of B) sharing that material with others who are not authorized to see it. Neither of which Clinton is guilty of and her setup was certainly more secure than anything her predecessors had.
 
Last edited:
At least you admit you don't care about Russian collusion or Russia and it all just an anti-Trump act.

If you had adult level reading comprehension, you would know that I never cared about "Russian collusion" and always said I saw no evidence that he colluded with anyone.

But you obviously don't.
 
Lynch didn't charge her, unless i missed something. Did she and I was sleeping too late that week?

Lynch let Comey "handle" her job on "the matter". Lynch didn't charge hunreds of millions of folks but that does not count as Lynch "exonerating" all of them. I see that you are unable (or at least unwilling) to produce what Lynch said about Hillary's placement of classified data on her personal server.
 
Yes, she was effectively exonerated by Comey. That's what I said.

I suggest you familiarize yourself with the definition of exonerate;

1) absolve (someone) from blame for a fault or wrongdoing, especially after due consideration of the case.
 
Lynch let Comey "handle" her job on "the matter". Lynch didn't charge hunreds of millions of folks but that does not count as Lynch "exonerating" all of them. I see that you are unable (or at least unwilling) to produce what Lynch said about Hillary's placement of classified data on her personal server.

So Lynch effectively exonerated Clinton. Just like Mueller effectively exonerated Trump by issuing no indictments.

Consistency, you know. I gather that's hard for you to grasp?
 
Do we even know enough about what was really in the report to draw these conclusions?
 
*put national security secrets into the hands of Russia.*

That's a complete unknown, a least in the public realm.

Ah, another Democrat claiming both former FBI Director Comey and Mueller are lying. Both said Russia (and Comey said numerous other adversarial foreign governments) learned national security secrets from Hilary Clinton.

At the same time, Bill Clinton was personally given half a million dollars from Russians and over $100 million Russian money went into the Clinton foundation.

That virtually no Democrat cares about that means that virtually no Democrat really cares about Russia, collusion or Russia's involvement in our political system. Rather, it is 100% partisan fake outrage.
 
I don't know, why don't you ask the Trump PICKED DoJ head and Trump himself? Or it could be that your comments are just BS and Hillary isn't guilty of what you are accusing her of. Take your pick Joko.

It must suck to make Bob Mueller out to be the harbinger of truth, and then he doesn't deliver the "truth" you wanted.
 
Back
Top Bottom