- Joined
- May 5, 2019
- Messages
- 15,598
- Reaction score
- 7,780
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Just a non political observation...seems like every poster may have a personal story that drives his/her opinion.
Just a non political observation...seems like every poster may have a personal story that drives his/her opinion.
Of course it is. Every Nation on Earth is a Nation of immigrants.
Why do you think the Human Race evolved to create Nations, Borders, and a means to defend them?
As the thread title says:
1) What makes a country "great"
2) Is there a greatest country right now?
I personally think how a country treats its own most vulnerable is more important than its military power or its GDP. I think quality of life and life experience for ordinary citizens makes a country greater than how many other countries it can defeat in battle or the historical dominance it may have once had.
I don't think there is a greatest country right now, though there are definitely some countries at the opposite ends of the spectrum - ordinary citizens live impoverished lives where they have little chance to affect or influence the direction of their nation or where significant minorities / sectors of society live shortened lives because there is little care or support for them.
I think we would have a much lower immigration problem if so many people of the world were not setting their sights on America as the nation to be desired above all others to live in.
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
This country’s greatness and true genius lies in its diversity.
The USA uniquely had the phrase set in it's immigration service mission statement, until Trump got hold of it.
I am in favor of immigration and in favor of laws controlling immigration for the good of the country. I am not in favor of breaking laws just because democrats think they should be broken.
I think we would have a much lower immigration problem if so many people of the world were not setting their sights on America as the nation to be desired above all others to live in.
The forefathers were white racist sexist pigs.. like everyone from Europe was at the time. The only defence is "everyone was like that" but what pisses me off is the whitewashing of history to make these forefathers more than they were. Accept their faults and accept that today it is not accepted because **** changes.
What was Africa like in the late 18th century? A collection of fair and equitable societies which welcomed foreigners of different races?
I know this might come as a shock to someone as little acquainted with geography as you, or as your failed excursions into geography make you seem, but Africa is not a country.What was Africa like in the late 18th century? A collection of fair and equitable societies which welcomed foreigners of different races?
The Story of Africa| BBC World Service
A few years later, Western slavers came and took over from / worked with African slavers but yes, generally there were a "collection of fair and equitable societies which welcomed foreigners of different races."
The nineteenth century saw immense changes in Africa. Some were driven by famine and disease. Some changes were the result of the territorial ambitions of African rulers. As the century progressed alliances with merchants and missionaries from Europe began increasingly to have a bearing on how African leaders achieved their goals.
At the beginning of the 19th century, Europeans were still hugely ignorant of the continent. The systematic colonisation of Africa, which gathered momentum in the 1880's, was not even on the horizon in the first half of the 19th century. Europeans had confined themselves to trading mainly along the coast. Inland the trade in slaves and commodities was handled by African and Arab merchants.
Arabs colonized northern Africa long before European whites got there. Why is this never mentioned?
Also, you linked to the wrong period. Here's the entry which offers insights into roughly the period I was asking about;
Arabs colonized northern Africa long before European whites got there. Why is this never mentioned?
Also, you linked to the wrong period. Here's the entry which offers insights into roughly the period I was asking about;
Europeans were only intensely involved in roughly 100 years of Africa's history, yet we're told this is why Africa lags behind today. Pure fiction.
Makes no change to what I was talking about. I specifically mentioned that slaving existed before white traders arrived. Slavery exists still - just as it still does in many parts of the world.
Do you know what the Portuguese did to African cities when first discovered? You honestly think it was only the Portuguese that levelled African settlements and reduced the locals back the Stone Age?
because whoever makes such mention would make himself look as much a fool as you are doing here.Arabs colonized northern Africa long before European whites got there. Why is this never mentioned?
and here you are lying yet once again, initially referring to the late 18th century to now change the goalposts to the 19th.Also, you linked to the wrong period. Here's the entry which offers insights into roughly the period I was asking about;
The Boers of South Africa (as much as the original "Sankhoi there) will no doubt laugh at such asinine claims as this one. Not to mention the peoples of Angola, Mocambique and Guinea-Bissau, but then what do you care about presenting actual facts when you can work with your usual falsehoods?:roll:No, and as I said, Europeans only played a dominant role in Africa for roughly 100 years, as colonizers.
I'd ask anyone else bringing this up WTH it has to do with anything, but people as dishonest as you I'll ask nothing at all.In stark contrast, Germany was obliterated twice in the 20th century, and partly controlled by the Soviet regime. Today Germany is perhaps the most modern country in the world, with a GDP per capita of $45k, compared with $1700 for Africa.
The only fiction here is the "historical" tripe that you present on account of being clearly ignorant of history and, by all appearances, too lazy to do any homework on it before you post such garbage.Europeans were only intensely involved in roughly 100 years of Africa's history, yet we're told this is why Africa lags behind today. Pure fiction.
No, and as I said, Europeans only played a dominant role in Africa for roughly 100 years, as colonizers. I'm sure a great many injustices and hardships were suffered during this time period. In stark contrast, Germany was obliterated twice in the 20th century, and partly controlled by the Soviet regime. Today Germany is perhaps the most modern country in the world, with a GDP per capita of $45k, compared with $1700 for Africa.
Side note: over here in the states, we actually have a serious candidate for president (Kamala Harris) who references Wakanda on Twitter.
I strongly suggest some history lessons before you post further.
Besides, this thread is about what makes a country great. The history of Africa is a separate thread for the academic forum.
Which historical fact did I get wrong?
I doubt anyone wants to spend an afternoon replying to that.
I doubt anyone wants to spend an afternoon replying to that.