- Joined
- Apr 25, 2011
- Messages
- 25,803
- Reaction score
- 20,579
- Location
- Austin, Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
What is the motive
- for all of the Federal and State Legislatures who have ever existed
- and for all of the Supreme Court Justices who have ever existed
- to damn men with biased laws against them - regarding several reproductive issues?
No significant Supreme Court decision regarding reproductive rights have been made, which involved women Justices on the panel of the Court other than ONE. The only other case outside of Roe v Wade - related to abortion - with a female Justice on the panel was in 1992 in the Planned Parenthood v Casey with Sandra Day O'Connor being the only female Justice sitting on the bench.
There's no record of any significant Congressional laws passed in eons that are even related to abortion (although there's been many attempts that can get past the S.C).
State's do have the right to regulation abortion within the boundaries of the Constitution and that of course involves decisions as to the Constitutionality of the Texas case known as Roe v Wade, followed by the next most important related case I named above.
States also have an obligation to abide by and protect both the US Constitution and their respective Constitutions.
Each State devises their own laws with regard to parent child relationships, which also include laws regarding child support.
If one did some serious research, I would bet that over the last 50 years - most every type of State and Federal law related to abortion, child/parent relationship cases (which involve child support) - the vast majority of the legislature member and Judicial members who have either enacted or adjudicated cases related to these issues - HAVE BEEN MEN.
So again I ask: What is the motive by all of these government bodies to purposely be so punitive to men with regard legal issues related to reproduction? What is the need for such a conspiracy - and how could it be so cleverly carried out for decades?
- for all of the Federal and State Legislatures who have ever existed
- and for all of the Supreme Court Justices who have ever existed
- to damn men with biased laws against them - regarding several reproductive issues?
No significant Supreme Court decision regarding reproductive rights have been made, which involved women Justices on the panel of the Court other than ONE. The only other case outside of Roe v Wade - related to abortion - with a female Justice on the panel was in 1992 in the Planned Parenthood v Casey with Sandra Day O'Connor being the only female Justice sitting on the bench.
There's no record of any significant Congressional laws passed in eons that are even related to abortion (although there's been many attempts that can get past the S.C).
State's do have the right to regulation abortion within the boundaries of the Constitution and that of course involves decisions as to the Constitutionality of the Texas case known as Roe v Wade, followed by the next most important related case I named above.
States also have an obligation to abide by and protect both the US Constitution and their respective Constitutions.
Each State devises their own laws with regard to parent child relationships, which also include laws regarding child support.
If one did some serious research, I would bet that over the last 50 years - most every type of State and Federal law related to abortion, child/parent relationship cases (which involve child support) - the vast majority of the legislature member and Judicial members who have either enacted or adjudicated cases related to these issues - HAVE BEEN MEN.
So again I ask: What is the motive by all of these government bodies to purposely be so punitive to men with regard legal issues related to reproduction? What is the need for such a conspiracy - and how could it be so cleverly carried out for decades?