• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What happens to the 2020 election if Bolton books says Trump did it all?

apdst said:
The Mueller Report didn't investigate any hacking. They based their determination on Cloudstrike's claim.
Click to expand...

Look, we both know I read the damned Mueller Report, and the only thing you read was the crawl on Fox News. The entire first half of the report was about Russian interference in the election, and repeated contacts between Russians and people in Trump's campaign/transition period.

P.S. It's "Crowdstrike" and it's a myth.
 
independentusa said:
Bolton's book is coming out soon and it may point to Trump having done everything that the Dems are now saying he should be removed for office for doing. So how do you think such a book, and direcctly from a man who should know, would effect not only Trump's reelection, but those GOP Senators who voted against allowing Bolton and others to testify? DO you think it would have any effect or are Trump followers so tied to Trump that it would not damage his or others reelcetion chances?
Click to expand...

Nothing. The election still takes place (every 4 years in the U.S.) and Trump wins.
 
DiAnna said:
Look, we both know I read the damned Mueller Report, and the only thing you read was the crawl on Fox News. The entire first half of the report was about Russian interference in the election, and repeated contacts between Russians and people in Trump's campaign/transition period.

P.S. It's "Crowdstrike" and it's a myth.
Click to expand...

I read it, and the bottom line was that there was "no collusion" and "no obstruction." The later was confirmed by the Operation Hurricane review and recent FISA Court when they stated that at least the last two renewals were based on lies. Comey needed to be fired.
 
RenoCon said:
I read it, and the bottom line was that there was "no collusion" and "no obstruction." The later was confirmed by the Operation Hurricane review and recent FISA Court when they stated that at least the last two renewals were based on lies. Comey needed to be fired.
Click to expand...

Mueller laid out dozens of interactions with Russians showing the Trump campaign/transition was interested in Russian offers to assist the campaign; however, Mueller could not find evidence of an actual acceptance from the Trump campaign; even so, 34 indictmentsl

However, obstruction is different. Mueller laid out a dozen examples of obstruction, stated that DOJ policy refused to allow the indictment of a sitting president, and that if the Mueller could have exonerated Trump, it would have done so. It didn't.
 
DiAnna said:
Look, we both know I read the damned Mueller Report, and the only thing you read was the crawl on Fox News. The entire first half of the report was about Russian interference in the election, and repeated contacts between Russians and people in Trump's campaign/transition period.

P.S. It's "Crowdstrike" and it's a myth.
Click to expand...

You can read the Mueller Report 50 times and it doesn't change the fact that it didn't rely on first hand evidence.

"Crowd"strike (WTFE) told the FBI and the FBI told the witch hunt team. You people are so easy to manipulate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom