• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What Happened To The Thoughtful Conservative Republican?

I can't believe this much stupid in one thread. If the liberals that have posted here can't admit that the conservative side has some ideas that make sense, then I truly feel sorry for your poor social and intellectual development.

...[...apparently this republican-radio-level cheerleader hasn't figured out that smart people are outside of the narrow, stoooooooooooooooooooopid 'liberal/left/democrat vs. conservative/right/republican' dichotomy...ugh...functionally, it seems gino could be adequately replaced by ruse limbaugh's parrot..]
 
...[...apparently this republican-radio-level cheerleader hasn't figured out that smart people are outside of the narrow, stoooooooooooooooooooopid 'liberal/left/democrat vs. conservative/right/republican' dichotomy...ugh...functionally, it seems gino could be adequately replaced by ruse limbaugh's parrot..]

This forum has just about become useless. The left side refuses to acknowledge that the other side has a valid view also. All you are arguing is "The right is wrong." You aren't actually debating anything...
 
This forum has just about become useless. The left side refuses to acknowledge that the other side has a valid view also. All you are arguing is "The right is wrong." You aren't actually debating anything...

Tell me all the great things you love about leftist politics
 
This forum has just about become useless. The left side refuses to acknowledge that the other side has a valid view also. All you are arguing is "The right is wrong." You aren't actually debating anything...


...ugh...little do you know but your childish republican-radio-level political philosophy is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay closer to the 'leftist democrats' than is mine...

...smart people are waaaay outside the stooooooooopid republicrat 'left/right' dichotomy... word...
 
The US Should Apologize for the Atomic Bombings – and Denuclearize - Antiwar.com Original

The US Should Apologize for the Atomic Bombings – and Denuclearize
Seventy-five years after the atomic bombings, we’re still engaging in a false narrative that attempts to justify the unjustifiable.

by Olivia Alperstein Posted on August 14, 2020

Seventy-five years ago, on August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. Three days later, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on a second Japanese city, Nagasaki.

Experts estimate that more than 200,000 people lost their lives and hundreds of thousands were injured or exposed and survived. Generations later, families continue to reckon with the devastating toll of those bombings. To this day, no other nation on earth has engaged in such an action.

The United States owes Hiroshima and Nagasaki an apology for committing atrocities against their citizens, but an apology is not enough. It’s a symbolic gesture, empty without a commitment to concrete action to ensure that such atrocities never occur again.

The United States owes the rest of the world a solemn promise to act to prevent the use of nuclear weapons and to engage in tangible steps toward their elimination.

As the only nation to ever use nuclear weapons in an act of war, it’s past time for the United States to commit to never engage in a nuclear first strike, to take U.S. nuclear weapons off hair-trigger alert, and to engage in good faith in multilateral negotiations to reduce and eliminate our nuclear arsenal.

Instead, 75 years after the atomic bombings, we’ve withdrawn from most international treaties that reduce or limit the potential for nuclear war and we’re now considering re-engaging in live nuclear testing for the first time in decades.
 
The US Should Apologize for the Atomic Bombings – and Denuclearize - Antiwar.com Original

The US Should Apologize for the Atomic Bombings – and Denuclearize
Seventy-five years after the atomic bombings, we’re still engaging in a false narrative that attempts to justify the unjustifiable.

by Olivia Alperstein Posted on August 14, 2020

Seventy-five years ago, on August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. Three days later, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on a second Japanese city, Nagasaki.

Experts estimate that more than 200,000 people lost their lives and hundreds of thousands were injured or exposed and survived. Generations later, families continue to reckon with the devastating toll of those bombings. To this day, no other nation on earth has engaged in such an action.

The United States owes Hiroshima and Nagasaki an apology for committing atrocities against their citizens, but an apology is not enough. It’s a symbolic gesture, empty without a commitment to concrete action to ensure that such atrocities never occur again.

The United States owes the rest of the world a solemn promise to act to prevent the use of nuclear weapons and to engage in tangible steps toward their elimination.

As the only nation to ever use nuclear weapons in an act of war, it’s past time for the United States to commit to never engage in a nuclear first strike, to take U.S. nuclear weapons off hair-trigger alert, and to engage in good faith in multilateral negotiations to reduce and eliminate our nuclear arsenal.

Instead, 75 years after the atomic bombings, we’ve withdrawn from most international treaties that reduce or limit the potential for nuclear war and we’re now considering re-engaging in live nuclear testing for the first time in decades.

We can't "Denuclearize" even if we wanted to. There is no place to store the crap and it is really really expensive. Even our nuclear power plant waste ends up in dry casks on site because of the refusal to allow the construction of a new depository.
 
The US Should Apologize for the Atomic Bombings – and Denuclearize
Request denied. Both requests.

Those anti-war nutcases (I refer to anti-war nutcases in general, not just the website with the same title) sure are loony.


Seventy-five years after the atomic bombings, we’re still engaging in a false narrative that attempts to justify the unjustifiable.
The only false narrative that I'm aware of is the one that is pushed by anti-war loonies.


Experts estimate that more than 200,000 people lost their lives
Experts say that no more than 200,000 people were killed.


The United States owes Hiroshima and Nagasaki an apology for committing atrocities against their citizens, but an apology is not enough.
We didn't commit any atrocity and we don't owe any apology.


The United States owes the rest of the world a solemn promise to act to prevent the use of nuclear weapons and to engage in tangible steps toward their elimination.
As the only nation to ever use nuclear weapons in an act of war, it’s past time for the United States to commit to never engage in a nuclear first strike, to take U.S. nuclear weapons off hair-trigger alert, and to engage in good faith in multilateral negotiations to reduce and eliminate our nuclear arsenal.
There's a good reason why no one pays any attention to anti-war loonies.
 
Request denied. Both requests.

Those anti-war nutcases (I refer to anti-war nutcases in general, not just the website with the same title) sure are loony.



The only false narrative that I'm aware of is the one that is pushed by anti-war loonies.



Experts say that no more than 200,000 people were killed.



We didn't commit any atrocity and we don't owe any apology.



There's a good reason why no one pays any attention to anti-war loonies.

You must be very pro war.


Kill em all and let god sort it out
 
You must be very pro war.


Kill em all and let god sort it out


...maybe he'll get off his faux news-watching couch and join/form a private foreign legion for iZrael... he is justified in giving his own life and money to 'the [stinking] cauZe'...

...but these republican/crat warmongers want to stick their hands into the public trea$ury, use taxpayer-financed mercenaries, etc., to further their asinine ideas... ugh... and then they work their hamburger holes about 'low taxes' and 'limited government'... :lol:
 
You must be very pro war.
Kill em all and let god sort it out
That depends. I do think we should protect our allies if they are attacked by China or Russia or some similar enemy. I'd be willing to die in a nuclear war if that's what it takes to protect our friends.

But I hope that deterrence prevails and there is no such war. I consider the fact that the Cold War ended without a nuclear war to be a good outcome.
 
That depends. I do think we should protect our allies if they are attacked by China or Russia or some similar enemy. I'd be willing to die in a nuclear war if that's what it takes to protect our friends.

But I hope that deterrence prevails and there is no such war. I consider the fact that the Cold War ended without a nuclear war to be a good outcome.

Good for you. Nukes for everyone. Nukes for every war. I mean we need to save American lives
 
Back
Top Bottom