Anything to divert from Obama's record.
What do you think going to college into a certain field is?
DEFINITELY NOT RISK TAKING THAT IS SURE.
Now that you mentioned it, "Fair and balanced" media wont bring anything else up other than "Obama's Record", which they distort...
He has shown an abiltiy to profit from all sorts of business takeovers, perhaps he plans on taking us into bankruptcy, he has plenty of knowledge of that too.
One thing we can be sure of he will be the same as every other Republican President and will take us into a recession in his 1st term if elected.
I sure you will still be supporting him as most Romneyites want another recession. It's the "medicine" we need, right?
Anything to divert from Obama's record.
Bush didn't take us in to a recession until near the end of his presidency.
That was his SECOND recession.
and all due to his being a Republican? Wow, now there's something to think about.
How many Democratic presidents have had recessions during their time in office? Could there really be a cause and effect? Both recession and Republican start with R's, after all.
A vote for Mitt Romney is a vote for another job-killing “Great Recession.” Why do some economists call the Republican Party the party of recessions? The empirical evidence of history reveals that the number of recessions since 1899 totaled 23. Recessions that began under a Republican administration total 17, and recessions that began under a Democratic administration are six. Six Republican presidents had multiple recessions beginning on their watch, and only two Democrat presidents had multiple recessions beginning on their watch.
The total length of Republican recessions is 23 years, and the length of Democratic administration recessions is only five years and three months. Republicans handed off four recessions to Democratic administrations, and Democrats handed off only one recession to Republicans. Five Democratic administrations have recorded nine terms (36 years) of “recession free” economic success since 1899.
Call it coincidence or karma or whatever. It is still true that EVERY new Republican elected President since 1899 has had a recession in his first term
GUEST OPINION: More recessions occurred during Republican administrations - theoaklandpress.com
What, exactly, are "we" looking for in Romney's* tax returns?
- Are we looking for illegal activity?
- Are we looking for his tax exemptions? If they're legal, why does that matter?
- Are we looking for the rate he paid? Somewhat tied to the previous point, if he paid less legally due to exemptions, why does that matter?
- Are we looking for his charitable, or lack of, contributions so we can say, "Aha!!!"
Seriously, what do we expect to find? Please, to those for whom this is a big deal, be specific.
*- Really applies to any candidate in any election, but Romney is the 'guy-du-jour'.
I would say most, like myself, are looking to see if the king of the 1% has been playing by the same rules as the rest of us, but you should probably ask these people:
"Among independents, 67% said the Republican candidate should release more years of returns."
Ryan: There is time to turn America around by electing Romney - CNN.com
Call it coincidence or karma or whatever. It is still true that EVERY new Republican elected President since 1899 has had a recession in his first term
GUEST OPINION: More recessions occurred during Republican administrations - theoaklandpress.com
wow
It's such and easy answer, first for anyone to obtain capital they had to work for it. Yes, that's right they had to work and save to obtain capital to invest. So both are starting from the same point. You talk about two college people but one is an investor and one is a worker B. What you are missing is they both started out as worker "B's
They are not worker "b's"
To go to college is to obtain something that no one else has. To go to college is to make a commitment to society that you WILL contribute. Why would I pay, or anyone, such a stash to do so?
So why then are they up the ladder tier from someone else.
Hint^^^ look above this rep.
SIgh
Sigh
Sigh
What, exactly, are "we" looking for in Romney's* tax returns?
- Are we looking for illegal activity?
- Are we looking for his tax exemptions? If they're legal, why does that matter?
- Are we looking for the rate he paid? Somewhat tied to the previous point, if he paid less legally due to exemptions, why does that matter?
- Are we looking for his charitable, or lack of, contributions so we can say, "Aha!!!"
Seriously, what do we expect to find? Please, to those for whom this is a big deal, be specific.
*- Really applies to any candidate in any election, but Romney is the 'guy-du-jour'.
Why don't you ask the IRS if Romney has been playing by the same rules as you? What you have no confidence in yet another big arm of your beloved government. An inept government, and yet you want it bigger, to become even more useless and inept.
The IRS does not make value judgments of whether the legal tax loopholes for the 1% make their total tax rate less than that of the average citizen. Why do you think more than 2/3 of Independents want Romney to release his tax returns?
Well of course it was handed to them, by Democrats, and Republicans were voted in to fix it. Just like they are going to vote in Romney to fix Obama's failures.
IMO, "they" are looking for something/anything to keep the public/voter from looking at the real issues. Nothing more.
Because those Independents participating in polling today are no more independents, than Dana, or CONSaginROMNEY are conservative. :mrgreen:
Got it, independents, democrats, and moderate conservatives are all wrong, and only ultra conservatives are right.
Catchy campaign slogan you've got yourself there! Best of luck with it!
How is it any different than your last three years of Obama cheerleading? Oh that's right, forgive me, I forgot....It's only valid when you do it for your hero....eace:
I would prefer a liberal over Obama, but we were discussing your attack against independents. Do go on.........................