• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What attracts anti-abortion males to this site?

There has never been and never will be a reason to hate women. It is never their responsibility for putting more unwanted babies on the planet. Only men are responsible for it. That is a fact.

Do you hate pro-life women? And why do you continue to state things as "facts" when they're either (a) not true or (b) an opinion? The difference in fact and opinion is taught in 1st grade.
 
All pregnancies increase a woman's risk of death, no matter how small that increase is.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

...and your point?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
...and your point?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The point is that no woman is morally or legally obligated to take that risk if she's not prepared to have a kid.




This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
Do you hate pro-life women? And why do you continue to state things as "facts" when they're either (a) not true or (b) an opinion? The difference in fact and opinion is taught in 1st grade.

I reckon there must be a "phobia" we can come up with to cover this! People can just tack phobia on the end of anything now days...a total lack of understanding of what phobia means, but they do it anyway.
 
Do you hate pro-life women? And why do you continue to state things as "facts" when they're either (a) not true or (b) an opinion? The difference in fact and opinion is taught in 1st grade.

She has no idea what the **** a fact actually is.... she thinks her opinion is fact... idiotic.

Then she runs and hides when her stupid posts are exposed for the sheer stupidity that they are...
 
Josie, I already said I never hate women just because they are pro-life. It is always the reason that matters and how they react.
 
I'm a male against abortion. Why am I here? I like to poke sticks at pretentious, intellectually dishonest liberals who like to pretend it's a "woman's rights" issue. At least Margaret Sanger was honest about it, and she started the movement.
 
I'm a male against abortion. Why am I here? I like to poke sticks at pretentious, intellectually dishonest liberals who like to pretend it's a "woman's rights" issue. At least Margaret Sanger was honest about it, and she started the movement.

Translation: Women know more than I do and it pisses me off.
 
I'm a male against abortion. Why am I here? I like to poke sticks at pretentious, intellectually dishonest liberals who like to pretend it's a "woman's rights" issue. At least Margaret Sanger was honest about it, and she started the movement.

Actually Margaret Sanger was pro life her entire life.....so theres that
 
I'm a male against abortion. Why am I here? I like to poke sticks at pretentious, intellectually dishonest liberals who like to pretend it's a "woman's rights" issue. At least Margaret Sanger was honest about it, and she started the movement.

Sanger was vehemently anti abortion. She was on YOUR side.
 
The point is that no woman is morally or legally obligated to take that risk if she's not prepared to have a kid.

Exactly. Nor should any woman be so obligated. Since it's the woman who takes on all the health risks and even possible life-threatening complications of pregnancy and birth, only she should be able to decide whether or not to take that risk. It isn't -- and should never be -- anyone else's right to make that choice for her.
 
I'm a male against abortion. Why am I here? I like to poke sticks at pretentious, intellectually dishonest liberals who like to pretend it's a "woman's rights" issue. At least Margaret Sanger was honest about it, and she started the movement.

Abortion is a woman's rights issue, to me anyway. I think pretending it isn't is what is really dishonest, since it is the woman who is affected by pregnancy and birth.
 
I'm a male against abortion. Why am I here? I like to poke sticks at pretentious, intellectually dishonest liberals who like to pretend it's a "woman's rights" issue. At least Margaret Sanger was honest about it, and she started the movement.

How can you possibly think it is not a women's rights issue? Legally, abortion is ONLY a women's rights issue no matter how you look at it.

If you know anything about Margaret Sanger, chances are it is she always opposed abortion.
 
The irresponsibility is having sex if you are not prepared for the risk of getting pregnant.

That's your opinion, but no one has to live by it unless they want to do so. Nor do you get to define "responsibility" for anyone else but yourself. Just because a woman doesn't ever want children doesn't mean she should be forced to remain celibate for life as punishment. And this applies to men as well.
 
The Xonstitution to the extent it authorizes murder is wrong and I do not accept the Constitution as a sufficient argument to establish morality.

The Constitution does not authorize murder. It prevents abortionists and doctors from being charged with murder when they abort pregnancies by fully recognizing abortion as a women's right.

Did you really think I am using the Constitution to establish morality?
 
He did not miss that point at all. It is all about whether a woman wants to be pregnant or not.

Exactly. And when a woman doesn't want to stay pregnant and give birth, she has the right to have an abortion.
 
You need to get to my daughter and daughter in law. Foolish girls were so excited to show off their baby bumps and talk about being mothers.

Which doesn't make them actual mothers; as in, women who have given birth. Just because a woman is pregnant doesn't automatically make her a mother, especially if she doesn't want to be one.
 
The point you missed was that they knew there was a human inside-from the moment of conception.

The point you missed was that both your daughter and daughter-in-law wanted to be mothers. Not all women do. And if a woman doesn't want to stay pregnant, it's her right to have an abortion, whether she's related to you or not. Daughters don't "owe" their parents grandchildren.
 
Once she is pregnant, she is pregnant, unless she decides to kill it. She should have thought of that before coitus.

Actually, it's her decision whether to stay pregnant or not. And that applies after coitus as well as before.
 
I do. I know that if I get pregnant, abortion will be on the table. Not my problem if people don't like that.

I always felt the same way, and had the same plan if I'd ever gotten pregnant. Luckily that never happened because my BC didn't fail. I know that not all women are as fortunate.
 
Evidently you do not understand the impact pregnancy can have on a woman's body.

I agree, many anti-abortion guys don't understand it. And from what I've seen posted about it here, many of them simply don't care either. Why would they, when they know they never have to suffer the often-negative impact of pregnancy themselves?
 
Nah, it's still murder. and you are saying that the round-heels weren't educated enough to use some form of contraception, didn't want to be mothers?

All forms of contraception can and do fail, since none of them are 100% guaranteed against unwanted pregnancy. Do you really not know this?
 
So you claim that all pregnant women’s lives are threatened by pregnancy.

I don't believe anyone claimed that. However, pregnancy can and often does threaten the woman's health at best and her life at worst. Not all women have healthy and easy pregnancies. That's why it's up to each woman to decide whether or not to stay pregnant and give birth. If you aren't the woman who is pregnant, it isn't -- and should never be -- your decision.
 
Back
Top Bottom