• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Week's six shocking climate events

Bergslagstroll said:
Extreme heat waves have now become the norm in Alaska because of manmade global warming.

"Record-breaking heat is now the norm in Alaska. It is driven in part by the feedback loops scientists have warned for many years will accompany anthropogenic climate change. For example, the present extreme dearth of sea ice in the Bering and Chukchi seas creates expansive areas of newly opened ocean, which transfer significant heat into the atmosphere. It fuels record heat waves, which further warm ocean waters and help delay subsequent sea ice formation. In turn, temperatures steadily rise in what Thoman calls “the escalator of climate change.”

The changes disrupt life in Alaska. According to the Government Accountability Office, declining sea ice and melting permafrost have put at least 31 communities at risk, with erosion imperiling homes, roads and drinking water sources. Three villages — Kivalina, Newtok and Shishmaref — face the traumatic realization that they must relocate soon or cease to exist."


90 degrees in Alaska: Extreme heat is irreversibly altering the last frontier | TheHill
Click to expand...

Nonsense. The the state record temperature for Alaska is 100 F set way back in 1915.

It remains unbroken
 
flogger said:
Nonsense. The the state record temperature for Alaska is 100 F set way back in 1915.

It remains unbroken
Click to expand...

To a climate jihadist, an increase by 1 degree in temperature is a shocking sign of climate change.
 
PoS said:
To a climate jihadist, an increase by 1 degree in temperature is a shocking sign of climate change.
Click to expand...

Its all about fostering green guilt. If you can control the way people think then thats money and power right there

Why else do you think its always the politicians and not the scientists that are the most shrill in their pronouncements of doom ?

You might find this UK government sponsored propaganda video a real eye opener in that regard. Its a fact free hysteria ridden lecture used to scare the kiddies and more importantly their parents

Climate change bedtime stories Youtube - Yahoo Video Search results

I suspect you'll appreciate this edit more :lol:

Climate change bedtime stories Youtube - Yahoo Video Search results
 
JBG said:
I have been aware of that for a long time. Apparently it's a secret for some.
Click to expand...

The masters of the AGW dogma wish not to inform their sheeple of the facts.
 
Corrected it to fit the narrative...
 
 
flogger; said:
Nonsense. The the state record temperature for Alaska is 100 F set way back in 1915.

It remains unbroken
Click to expand...

That was in Fort Yukon. The article referred to Anchorage. "temperatures in Anchorage soaring to a record-shattering 90 degrees".

JBG; said:
I have been aware of that for a long time. Apparently it's a secret for some.
Click to expand...
Aware of what? That Anchorage is not Fort Yukon? Or that the facts don't seem to matter to some?

Lord of Planar; said:
The masters of the AGW dogma wish not to inform their sheeple of the facts.
Click to expand...
Your posting history shows a very loose relationship with facts. It's almost non-existent.
 
flogger; said:
The record of 100F was set in 1915.

Instead of picking cherries just live with it :roll:
Click to expand...

The 1915 record was in Fort Yukon, not Anchorage.

How hard was it for you to miss the word Anchorage in the graphic that you responded to?
 
Last edited:
Quaestio said:
The 1915 record was in Fort Yukon, not Anchorage.

How hard was it for you to miss the word Anchorage in the graphic that you responded to?
Click to expand...

Flogger was talking about the state record temperatures. See post #27.

I know reading comprehension is hard for you, but you need to do better than that.
 
PoS said:
Flogger was talking about the state record temperatures. See post #27.

I know reading comprehension is hard for you, but you need to do better than that.
Click to expand...

He was responding to a post with a graphic with the label ANCHORAGE.

His post #27 was ALSO in response to a post with an article that was referring to Anchorage. I even quoted from it in post #37.

I know reading comprehension is hard for you, but I don't expect any better from you.
 
Last edited:
Quaestio said:
He was responding to a post with an article referring to ANCHORAGE. I know reading comprehension is hard for you, but I don't expect any better from you.
Click to expand...

Since you obviously didnt read post #27, here is the direct quote he made.

flogger said:
Nonsense. The the state record temperature for Alaska is 100 F set way back in 1915.

It remains unbroken
Click to expand...

Is it the quality of schooling or the water Down Under that made you miss that?
 
PoS said:
Since you obviously didnt read post #27, here is the direct quote he made.



Is it the quality of schooling or the water Down Under that made you miss that?
Click to expand...

Since you obviously didn't read the post his post #27 was responding to and didn't even read the article (he obviously didn't either), here is my post #37 with the quote from the article:

Quaestio said:
That was in Fort Yukon. The article referred to Anchorage. [I]"temperatures in Anchorage soaring to a record-shattering 90 degrees"[/I].

Aware of what? That Anchorage is not Fort Yukon? Or that the facts don't seem to matter to some?
Click to expand...

Is it your mindless conspiracy ideation, addiction to using lame strawmen arguments, or your rejection of reality that made you miss that? Or all 3?
 
Last edited:
Quaestio said:
Since you obviously didn't read the post his post #27 was responding to and didn't even read the article (he obviously didn't either), here is my post #37 with the quote from the article:



Is it your mindless conspiracy ideation, addiction to using lame strawmen arguments, or your rejection of reality that made you miss that? Or all 3?
Click to expand...

He was making a point that the state temp record wasnt broken. As Ive said, you need to take remedial reading comprehension classes because youre missing what I'm telling you too.
 
PoS said:
He was making a point that the state temp record wasnt broken. As Ive said, you need to take remedial reading comprehension classes because youre missing what I'm telling you too.
Click to expand...

That's like saying that "the temperature of Los Angeles broke all heat records, with devastating effects like drought and wildfires, but it's cool in New York".
 
Media_Truth said:
That's like saying that "the temperature of Los Angeles broke all heat records, with devastating effects like drought and wildfires, but it's cool in New York".
Click to expand...

Strawman fallacy- as usual.
 
PoS said:
Strawman fallacy- as usual.
Click to expand...

Not at all. Focusing on another geographical region, when the subject is a different geographical is a nonsensical argument.
 
Media_Truth said:
Not at all. Focusing on another geographical region, when the subject is a different geographical is a nonsensical argument.
Click to expand...

Wrong. Your pal Quaestio accused him of comparing the wrong cities, when flogger was actually talking about the temp records for the entire state.

It seems you need to take remedial reading comprehension classes too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom