• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

We Now Know Trump ‘Committed a Felony’ Fox News' Judge Napolitano

marke said:
No, Trump has not been convicted of a felony and if the dirty prosecutors and judges do try and convict him it will be only by an unjust kangaroo court. Trump can spend his own money like he chooses in spite of the vicious claims to the contrary.
Click to expand...

So you believe he is above the law. It is that simple so just say it that way.
 
iguanaman said:
So you believe he is above the law. It is that simple so just say it that way.
Click to expand...

If Trump is above the law it is because there are supporters who shield him from criminal investigation and prosecution, the way the Obamanites did Hillary.
 
marke said:
If Trump is above the law it is because there are supporters who shield him from criminal investigation and prosecution, the way the Obamanites did Hillary.
Click to expand...

No one shielded Hillary from anything. She was not indicted because no indictable offense was found in any of the many investigations of her and Bill. You have been reading too many conspiracy theories.
 
iguanaman said:
no one shielded hillary from anything. She was not indicted because no indictable offense was found in any of the many investigations of her and bill. You have been reading too many conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

baloney.
 
Mach said:
Well. When Fox news lays it out like that. While I suspected that was the case, he seems certain that it's necessarily the case.

SDNY, you go left, House Dems take right, Mueller, you're with us straight down the middle?

So what's their plan, sealed indictment? Try to toll it? Word is even SDNY won't try to indict a sitting president, policy is policy.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-judge-napolitano-we-now-know-trump-committed-a-felony
Click to expand...


The felony is paying Michael Cohen to commit a felony.
"It’s pretty basic.… A hires B to shoot someone, A is as liable as if he had pulled the trigger. You pay someone to commit a crime you are liable, criminally liable."​
-- Andrew Napolitano
​

For some reason, Trumpkins don't and likely ever won't get it....Whadda you know? Donald Trump was right: There was no collusion...There was conspiracy.
 
lwf said:
If it's ok to assume Hillary broke the law without legal proof, is it also ok to assume Trump did?
Click to expand...

How preponderous are the evidences in each case?
 
marke said:
I don't know what academic rank Hillary had in her all girl white privilege college but it is certain she never learned decency, respect for others, kindness, truthfulness, honesty or other good Christian morals and values.
Click to expand...

Who helps you tie your shoes every day?
 
Mach said:
I haven't hard much about tolling, I've been missing news a lot. DOJ I suppose won't be doing that, it would look like they were out to get Trump. Which is true, but not for the reasons right-wingers would cry until the end of time about.
Click to expand...


If hunting and indicting/incarcerating/impeaching, etc., a criminal is "out to get him", then so be it.

But, it's a meaningless turn of prose.
 
marke said:
baloney.
Click to expand...


The clintons have been investigated for 25 years, and thus far, no indictments, after millions of hours of congressional time and taxpayer dollars wasted..

What was this baloney you speak of?

But, speaking of baloney, I suggest you do a thorough study of the Carl Sagan Baloney Detection Kit.

Seems to me your skills are very weak.
 
marke said:
No, Trump has not been convicted of a felony and if the dirty prosecutors and judges do try and convict him it will be only by an unjust kangaroo court. Trump can spend his own money like he chooses in spite of the vicious claims to the contrary.
Click to expand...

Yours or Trump's ignorance of the law does not exonerate him. There ARE ways you may not spend your money legally. And, convicting narcissists like Trump is always easier because they can't shut their ****ing mouths. They always hang themselves.
 
D_NATURED said:
Yours or Trump's ignorance of the law does not exonerate him. There ARE ways you may not spend your money legally. And, convicting narcissists like Trump is always easier because they can't shut their ****ing mouths. They always hang themselves.
Click to expand...

And it's okay for him to lie, according to his lawyer, because he isn't under oath.
 
OscarLevant said:
The clintons have been investigated for 25 years, and thus far, no indictments, after millions of hours of congressional time and taxpayer dollars wasted..

What was this baloney you speak of?

But, speaking of baloney, I suggest you do a thorough study of the Carl Sagan Baloney Detection Kit.

Seems to me your skills are very weak.
Click to expand...

Democrats have been protecting the Clintons from investigation and prosecution for decades. US laws apply to most people, but not to the Clintons.
 
D_NATURED said:
Yours or Trump's ignorance of the law does not exonerate him. There ARE ways you may not spend your money legally. And, convicting narcissists like Trump is always easier because they can't shut their ****ing mouths. They always hang themselves.
Click to expand...

If democrats cannot find laws Trump clearly broke then they will simply twist his actions into contorted interpretations to make him look like he broke laws. Are lawless democrats zealous of the law? Hell no. They are are consumed with a passion to bring Trump down for the support he has given to American conservatives and the conservative agenda.
 
marke said:
Democrats have been protecting the Clintons from investigation and prosecution for decades. US laws apply to most people, but not to the Clintons.
Click to expand...


You mean like Mueller, Rosenstein, Sessions, Comey, are all republicans?

You mean like how republicans have been apologizing and looking the other way on Trump's crimes?

And, on the last statement, provide evidence, please.
 
marke said:
How preponderous are the evidences in each case?
Click to expand...

In Hillary's case, just enough for a Republican congressional probe that lead to zero indictments. In Trump's case enough for a Republican led criminal investigation leading to the indictment of three dozen or so of his closest allies and counting. Whether it will be enough to indict Trump himself is an open question, but it's not looking good for him or his family.
 
marke said:
Democrats have been protecting the Clintons from investigation and prosecution for decades. US laws apply to most people, but not to the Clintons.
Click to expand...

Republicans have been in control of all branches of government for years. If the Clintons have not been prosecuted in that time, then obviously there is nothing to prosecute.
 
Mach said:
Well. When Fox news lays it out like that. While I suspected that was the case, he seems certain that it's necessarily the case.

SDNY, you go left, House Dems take right, Mueller, you're with us straight down the middle?

So what's their plan, sealed indictment? Try to toll it? Word is even SDNY won't try to indict a sitting president, policy is policy.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-judge-napolitano-we-now-know-trump-committed-a-felony
Click to expand...

I don't think so. You don't order a lawyer to break the law. As low life as they are, they are required to tell you that you won't do it because it's illegal. There is no "My client ordered me to break the law" defense.

It's time for the AG to appoint a SP to look into congress paying hush money out of taxpayers pockets. Since it's suddenly illegal to use one's own funds, it's has to at least as illegal to use taxpayer money to do it.
 
OscarLevant said:
You mean like Mueller, Rosenstein, Sessions, Comey, are all republicans?

You mean like how republicans have been apologizing and looking the other way on Trump's crimes?

And, on the last statement, provide evidence, please.
Click to expand...

It does not matter what professional narcissisists call themselves or what political party they attach themselves to for personal advantage. Mueller and Comey have played both parties but there is no doubt that they do not want democrats investigated for existing evidence of criminal behavior and that they do want some republicans investigated in spite of the lack of criminal behavior.
 
lwf said:
In Hillary's case, just enough for a Republican congressional probe that lead to zero indictments. In Trump's case enough for a Republican led criminal investigation leading to the indictment of three dozen or so of his closest allies and counting. Whether it will be enough to indict Trump himself is an open question, but it's not looking good for him or his family.
Click to expand...

Republicans should appoint a special prosecutor to look into the many crimes committed by government employees in the Obama administration. Enough with democrat obstruction of justice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom