We men are tired of ....

[GreatNews2night]

Seems we have some common ground. However, I would draw attention to the what I would call the unfair travesty happening in women's athletics.

As many things in our society, differences between women's athletics and men's athletics are determined by money and market forces. As it is often the case in matters dictated by money, fairness is not the determinant factor. It's capitalism at work, and capitalism is not a fair system. However, it's the least bad system.

To mimic the famous saying, capitalism is the worst system, except for all the others.

 

[GreatNews2night]

Oh, come on.

You posted this giant pile of crap, and your postings support this misogynistic woman fearing garbage every day.

Own your fears and obsessions. Everyone sees it, god knows you make enough creepy assed threads about how you can't live in a normal society because you are so utterly terrified by women that you have to seek out uneducated women from 3rd world countries that you can emotionally abuse for your sexual gratification.

What I'm most surprised, is that supposedly there is actually a loser who is married to this guy and tolerates what he does, like constantly having unprotected sex with third world prostitutes (unless his whole facade here is just made-up for trolling purposes; that's why I said "supposedly"). What kind of idiotic wife is willing to put up with such thing? He pretends that she is OK with it because he financially provides for her. That makes of her a sad excuse for a gold-digging human being (not to forget, quasi-suicidal with the Russian Roulette of her husband having all this dangerous unprotected sex; it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when until they are both HIV+), and it is telling that this guy allegedly chose to marry that kind of woman (if she is not a figment of his imagination).

 

[jaeger19]

No, not exactly at all. I claimed that is untrue. Esp. not if the wife was working outside the home. The child/home responsibilities are very much viewed as work.

o.

Only if its a woman doing it. Society does not accept it as work for men.

So nowhere there did you say the man wouldnt be believed. We're still at how he think's he'll be perceived. He's a victim and doesnt want to be seen as one. That's up to him, he has a choice to speak out or not.

Oh please.. I pointed out he would not be believed. He would be laughed at. the woman would not be charged.. while if I was to do it to a woman.. I would be charged with sexual assault.

Strength according to rules...work, sport...is controlled. Strength applied during violence is completely different

Pooh. I don't suddenly become stronger the minute I get violent. I didn't wrestle at "half strength".. because of a rules. There is no rule that says that the 300 pound lineman can hit me with only the same force as I can generate in a 210 pound frame.

Face it.. when it suits women's purpose.. its perfectly fine to portray themselves as weak and fragile.. and we are not even talking force her. A man gets hit on by a woman in the workplace.. and no one gives a rip. No matter how annoying for the man.

A man hits on a woman in the workplace and she is a victim and he is a predator.

 

[Lursa]

Only if its a woman doing it. Society does not accept it as work for men.

Again, for the third (?) time? I disagree.

Oh please.. I pointed out he would not be believed. He would be laughed at. the woman would not be charged.. while if I was to do it to a woman.. I would be charged with sexual assault.

He wouldnt be laughed at if people believed him. And while the man might be more likely to have the cops called...actual charges have to be supported....and guess why? Because men have been doing so for millenia...you dont undo millenia of behavior and expectations in a few years.

Pooh. I don't suddenly become stronger the minute I get violent. I didn't wrestle at "half strength".. because of a rules. There is no rule that says that the 300 pound lineman can hit me with only the same force as I can generate in a 210 pound frame.

Never said any such thing. I didnt question strength, I offered the difference between controlled and required per circumstance (sport, job, etc) and violence.

Face it.. when it suits women's purpose.. its perfectly fine to portray themselves as weak and fragile.. and we are not even talking force her. A man gets hit on by a woman in the workplace.. and no one gives a rip. No matter how annoying for the man.

That's just silly. It suits men's purposes even today to push that envelope to see what they can get away with in order to get sexual favors from women. And why keep repeating yourself when I've clearly answered. If you dont agree...provide some support for that. I do not see women portraying themselves in the media today at all as weak and fragile.

Also, I'm not sure where you are working but women cannot 'hit on men' in the workplace anymore. If men dont speak up...just like women had not for hundreds of years...then dont whine about it. Act...all HR Depts are prepared to deal with it. You just dont want to admit that men want it both ways...not to have to feel threatened by women standing up for themselves now...and men not looking like victims in the same circumstances.

A man hits on a woman in the workplace and she is a victim and he is a predator.

You are not speaking of today's workplaces.

 

[danielpalos]

Only if its a woman doing it. Society does not accept it as work for men.

Oh please.. I pointed out he would not be believed. He would be laughed at. the woman would not be charged.. while if I was to do it to a woman.. I would be charged with sexual assault.

Pooh. I don't suddenly become stronger the minute I get violent. I didn't wrestle at "half strength".. because of a rules. There is no rule that says that the 300 pound lineman can hit me with only the same force as I can generate in a 210 pound frame.

Face it.. when it suits women's purpose.. its perfectly fine to portray themselves as weak and fragile.. and we are not even talking force her. A man gets hit on by a woman in the workplace.. and no one gives a rip. No matter how annoying for the man.

A man hits on a woman in the workplace and she is a victim and he is a predator.

..."i am exploring the concept of being a full service boyfriend". I don't mind helping out with some of the domestic stuff, and tend to help out more than I otherwise would, if I had a job outside the home.

And,

Whenever shall women truly believe in equality or should Men find any excuse to exclaim, "woe is me, i am the victim!?"

 

[SDET]

There's a simple answer: I don't give a **** what you think.

What I'm most surprised, is that supposedly there is actually a loser who is married to this guy and tolerates what he does, like constantly having unprotected sex with third world prostitutes (unless his whole facade here is just made-up for trolling purposes; that's why I said "supposedly"). What kind of idiotic wife is willing to put up with such thing? He pretends that she is OK with it because he financially provides for her. That makes of her a sad excuse for a gold-digging human being (not to forget, quasi-suicidal with the Russian Roulette of her husband having all this dangerous unprotected sex; it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when until they are both HIV+), and it is telling that this guy allegedly chose to marry that kind of woman (if she is not a figment of his imagination).

 

[SDET]

It's a matter of NOT being a victim and properly managing risk. "Don't defecate where you eat" has been a men's corporate motto for decades. Only a total fool would pursue a woman at work.

Again, for the third (?) time? I disagree.



He wouldnt be laughed at if people believed him. And while the man might be more likely to have the cops called...actual charges have to be supported....and guess why? Because men have been doing so for millenia...you dont undo millenia of behavior and expectations in a few years.


Never said any such thing. I didnt question strength, I offered the difference between controlled and required per circumstance (sport, job, etc) and violence.



That's just silly. It suits men's purposes even today to push that envelope to see what they can get away with in order to get sexual favors from women. And why keep repeating yourself when I've clearly answered. If you dont agree...provide some support for that. I do not see women portraying themselves in the media today at all as weak and fragile.

Also, I'm not sure where you are working but women cannot 'hit on men' in the workplace anymore. If men dont speak up...just like women had not for hundreds of years...then dont whine about it. Act...all HR Depts are prepared to deal with it. You just dont want to admit that men want it both ways...not to have to feel threatened by women standing up for themselves now...and men not looking like victims in the same circumstances.



You are not speaking of today's workplaces.

 

[danielpalos]

It's a matter of NOT being a victim and properly managing risk. "Don't defecate where you eat" has been a men's corporate motto for decades. Only a total fool would pursue a woman at work.

I agree. I prefer to flip a coin for my, even chance.

 

[Lursa]

It's a matter of NOT being a victim and properly managing risk. "Don't defecate where you eat" has been a men's corporate motto for decades. Only a total fool would pursue a woman at work.

Yes, you've written all that already, and really, since it's rather low brow, I prefer not to read it again. Did you have something to argue?

 

[SDET]

And you keep writing "being a victim". That's what I'm replying to. Another words, I'm not a victim because I don't leave the opportunity open to be one. I hope more men do the same. Be air-tight.

Yes, you've written all that already, and really, since it's rather low brow, I prefer not to read it again. Did you have something to argue?

 

[GreatNews2night]

There's a simple answer: I don't give a **** what you think.

In that case, why did you respond?

 

[SDET]

My hope is that some incel member or lurker sees my posts and thinks: "Hey! There is a way out!" I'm posting for the public's benefit. Folks, the key is going after what you want and to hell with what people think about it. Gerson's law, learn it, live it, love it!

In that case, why did you respond?

 

[jghiretire]

Real men are tired of whiny incels who can't handle that women are equal.

:applaud:applaud:applaud Right on!!

 

[jghiretire]

I truly don't understand "Red Pill Rage". The problem is men putting forth money and effort for the big zero or punishment in return. Rage takes effort. The correct reaction is an icy acknowledgement that all effort gets a man with an American women under ANY situation is simply bigger demands. Have you ever engaged in heroics (working evenings and weekends for no pay) to get all the tasks in your sprint complete only for that to become the new "baseline"? That's an example of what American women are like.

When you are a woman - then you can talk - until then - there must be something about you.

 

[jghiretire]

They wouldn't be angry if they listened to me. Hence, the power of observation. If you were actually thinking and paying attention, most of the MGTOW producers are 40+ year old men that have been smacked around by divorce court. It makes sense to listen and avoid the same mistakes.

There's your second mistake - "mansplaining".

 

[SDET]

Mansplaining is fine since men's interests are all I care about communicating. Not mansplaining means men getting blindsided. I'm against men getting blindsided. If I'm NOT mansplaining, I'm asleep at the switch.

There's your second mistake - "mansplaining".

 

[SDET]

Who the hell are you to say when I can and can't talk?

When you are a woman - then you can talk - until then - there must be something about you.

 

[GreatNews2night]

My hope is that some incel member or lurker sees my posts and thinks: "Hey! There is a way out!" I'm posting for the public's benefit. Folks, the key is going after what you want and to hell with what people think about it. Gerson's law, learn it, live it, love it!

When you see yourself bed-ridden, dying of AIDS, while your gold-digger wife takes off with your money, you won't love it as much.

 

[SDET]

I guess she COULD do that. However she would discover the concept of having an adult ex-son as a result. She gets the best bang for her buck by staying.

When you see yourself bed-ridden, dying of AIDS, while your gold-digger wife takes off with your money, you won't love it as much.

 

[Lursa]

And you keep writing "being a victim". That's what I'm replying to. Another words, I'm not a victim because I don't leave the opportunity open to be one. I hope more men do the same. Be air-tight.

And yet your thread is to and about other men, correct?

Some men prefer their equals in partners and to choose those partners with love, not dollar signs, on their minds.

 

[Lursa]

My hope is that some incel member or lurker sees my posts and thinks: "Hey! There is a way out!" I'm posting for the public's benefit. Folks, the key is going after what you want and to hell with what people think about it. Gerson's law, learn it, live it, love it!

It would be my hope that incels find love...not more disillusionment, disrespect, and ****ty priorities.

But that's just me.

 

[SDET]

Disillusionment, disrespect and crappy priorities is exactly what they get from Western women! It pains me that many of them don't have the nerve to seek what they are looking for in South American slums. Sure, it's dangerous, but either you'll die a violent death or you'll find what you're looking for. Either way, problem solved.

It would be my hope that incels find love...not more disillusionment, disrespect, and ****ty priorities.

But that's just me.

 

[Lursa]

Disillusionment, disrespect and crappy priorities is exactly what they get from Western women! It pains me that many of them don't have the nerve to seek what they are looking for in South American slums. Sure, it's dangerous, but either you'll die a violent death or you'll find what you're looking for. Either way, problem solved.

It seems that's what you got. Dont project your frustrations on all other men. Most dont have to learn 'the hard way' like you describe because most want more than pretty doormats they can screw and will clean the house.

 

[SDET]

I didn't say all other men: I said incels. I know a few of them.

Oh and on the notion of what men want, you might want to look at some scientific surveys. Let's just say that very few men would desire a frigid wife.

It seems that's what you got. Dont project your frustrations on all other men. Most dont have to learn 'the hard way' like you describe because most want more than pretty doormats they can screw and will clean the house.

 

[Incredulous]

What I'm most surprised, is that supposedly there is actually a loser who is married to this guy and tolerates what he does, like constantly having unprotected sex with third world prostitutes (unless his whole facade here is just made-up for trolling purposes; that's why I said "supposedly"). What kind of idiotic wife is willing to put up with such thing? He pretends that she is OK with it because he financially provides for her. That makes of her a sad excuse for a gold-digging human being (not to forget, quasi-suicidal with the Russian Roulette of her husband having all this dangerous unprotected sex; it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when until they are both HIV+), and it is telling that this guy allegedly chose to marry that kind of woman (if she is not a figment of his imagination).

Probably still living in his momma's basement. :lamo