• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was A Crime Committed Here??

Is it sexual assault for a guy to lie about his own wealth to get a girl into bed?

The girl in the OP consented to being blindfolded on every occasion she spent any time with her "boyfriend". Consented.
Consented to sex while blindfolded.

How can you consent to sex - then have it turn into a crime of sexual assault?

She consented to having sex with a man, not a woman. She consented to having a penis inserted into her, not a piece of plastic. Switch things around a bit and see how it sounds: A woman meets what she thinks is a lesbian with a strap-on who turns out to be man and, thinking that it's woman with a strap-on, they have blindfolded sex, . Does that sound like rape???
 
Am I to assume they were mentally competent? Presuming such competence then those you talked to were the very rare exception with what would have to be some very extenuating circumstance. I don't believe there are a statistically significant number of mentally competent people who don't know what masturbation is.
No doubt they are the exception.
 
Nah. More like Hillary voters.

Hillary voters were not voting nearly as blind as Trump voters. They knew exactly what they were getting. Trump voters not so much.
 
I don't get it either. It's very hard to believe somebody can be that oblivious and stupid.

Sorry, you have been here (DP) more than a year. Oblivious & Stupid, C'mon!
 
No...she didnt. She agreed to have sex with a man she knew as 'Kye'. She had no knowledge 'Kye' didnt exist.

Manti Te'o defense?
 
Other than stupidity....

Woman who wore fake penis, tricked blindfolded friend into having sex with her sentenced | Fox News

[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]





So a woman is stupid enough to agree to wear a blindfold every single time she meets this girl, and even agrees to sex with a blindfold....

The level of oddness here is astounding.

I'm having trouble understanding a crime of sexual assault. It was consensual sex. Blindfolded, but consensual. Idiotic, but consensual.

Other than gross-stupidity, was a crime committed here? Deserving of 6+ years in prison?

She was 27 years old, from the article:

Newland duped her friend by creating a Facebook page when she was 15 years old to take on the male persona, putting photos of an American man on there to make it more believable.

I think we're underestimating the depth of deception at play here. This sounds like 12 years of fraud, where that fraud was leveraged for sex.

What i find most unusual about this case is whether or not it's a crime to lie to someone for the purpose of obtaining consent. I'm inclined to think it should be because a 12 year intimate, online relationship can build a lot of trust.
 
So if a guy lies about his name to a girl, then has consensual sex with her, did he sexually assault her based on his lie about his name?


To me this is along the lines of a guy who frequents "glory holes" for pleasure.
One day he finds out the person on the other side of the wall is a male, so he claims he's been assaulted.


There's just a wee bit of difference between "My name's Joe" when it's really Brian and "I'm a guy" when you're really a woman.
 
Manti Te'o defense?
Not overly familiar with that but in that case wasnt the person simply fictional? So...a jerk thing to do for sure but Im not sure that could have been classified as criminal.

Good lesson though for not developing intimate relationships with people on line.
 
This essentially the exact same situation as when a transgendered man/woman deceive a male partner. The only difference is this girl isn't trans. The punishment though is a bit harsh, more than a bit harsh to be honest. This is more of a compensate the victim case than remove perpetrator off the street thing. I do believe the victim is culpable in this case as well, for not doing a minimum of due diligence.

According to the BBC article this is the second time she's been convicted of this crime. Given that the sentence may not be harsh enough.
 
Hillary voters were not voting nearly as blind as Trump voters. They knew exactly what they were getting. Trump voters not so much.

So you claim.
 
But the false identify resulted in her agreeing to have sex basically with the false identity, some guy. Not her friend, a girl.
She did not consent to have sex with a girl/friend, the false identify removed that option from her.

There are consequences to deceiving people into doing something they would not normally do.
If this was just some one night thing, and the girl had no history of this, and just did it because she was in love...I doubt it would have been this way, but apparently she's doing more than that.

It is strange though, I mean, at what point did it cross the line from consent to assault...was it because she was a girl and not a guy, or a friend and not a stranger?

When someone picks someone up at a bar, and the person lies about being a movie executive...and they have sex...is that non-consensual too?

What about when they lie about, say, being married?

This is a slippery slope, but i'm inclined to condemn the fraud rather than solely emphasizing the gender aspect.
 
The victim is not lessor or greater, but she is culpable as well. Let me be even more blunt. Sex is as intimate an act as one can get. If the woman was with a man before she would know the difference one and a dildo. I am not buying she didn't know. Maybe not at first, I might buy that. But not after multiple times. I was generous in comparing the situation to being fooled by a transgendered person. I would be more sympathetic to that victim, simply because the knowledge would be more difficult to ascertain. Strap on dildo?? Really?? She didn't know? After multiple times?? I aint buying it.

I do think the punishment as meted is harsh and more to the point, pointless. The victim should be compensated. Jail for the perpetrator is poor compensation. It is was me I would want to be compensated. Money might not make me happy but it would sure make me feel better.

I have no idea why you expect that a blindfolded woman would necessarily be able to discern a penis from a dildo.

All penises are unique, and many dildos are modeled after real penises.
 
I have no idea why you expect that a blindfolded woman would necessarily be able to discern a penis from a dildo.

All penises are unique, and many dildos are modeled after real penises.

I don't know maybe because it was the strap on variety, one would think the straps would give it away. Just a passing thought. :roll:
 
I don't know maybe because it was the strap on variety, one would think the straps would give it away. Just a passing thought. :roll:

Hmm, good point. While i agree that it is likely a receiver would be able to discern the difference, it isn't necessarily true, it may depend on contextual details that i don't believe we have.
 
I think it begins and ends with a woman creating a male persona, living that lie virtually and online for 12 years, using that male persona to develop a relationship with a woman, and then having sex with her.

To the point...why didnt the woman develop a relationship with her as a woman and have sex with her as a woman? Why did she commit the fraudulent act in order to engage in the sexual assault? The answer is because the victim would not have had any interest in her romantically as a woman.

I'm going beyond this specific case in my question, and asking you what is the line where the deceit rates sexual assault charges. Looking at my male example again. If the man has ED, but develops the relationship as if he had no problems, is it sexual assault if he uses a strap on instead? And just to explore to possibilities, say the deceiver in question is a genetic woman, and portrays herself as such, but for what ever reason got the "addadicktome" operation?

Don't get me wrong. Any deceit is wrong and improper, and in many cases may even justify charges of some sort. I am not trying to excuse the deceitful behavior. The question is when does that behavior escalate to sexual assault?
 
I'm going beyond this specific case in my question, and asking you what is the line where the deceit rates sexual assault charges. Looking at my male example again. If the man has ED, but develops the relationship as if he had no problems, is it sexual assault if he uses a strap on instead? And just to explore to possibilities, say the deceiver in question is a genetic woman, and portrays herself as such, but for what ever reason got the "addadicktome" operation?

Don't get me wrong. Any deceit is wrong and improper, and in many cases may even justify charges of some sort. I am not trying to excuse the deceitful behavior. The question is when does that behavior escalate to sexual assault?

Essentially the definition of sexual assault is unwanted contact to the breasts buttocks loins and groin. In the situation you would hypothesize about perspective would come into consideration but would probably not be considered a legal violation. In that instance there was wanted contact from one individual to another individual. The contact would be received by the individual. The difference in the case at hand of course is that the victim does not want and is not consenting to sexual contact from a woman.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Other than stupidity....

Woman who wore fake penis, tricked blindfolded friend into having sex with her sentenced | Fox News

[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]





So a woman is stupid enough to agree to wear a blindfold every single time she meets this girl, and even agrees to sex with a blindfold....

The level of oddness here is astounding.

I'm having trouble understanding a crime of sexual assault. It was consensual sex. Blindfolded, but consensual. Idiotic, but consensual.

Other than gross-stupidity, was a crime committed here? Deserving of 6+ years in prison?

It's fraud. Seems deserving of a prison sentence to me.

Sure, the victim was really dumb, but so what? A lot of financial fraud takes advantage of stupid people and that doesn't get the people committing the fraud off the hook.
 
It's fraud. Seems deserving of a prison sentence to me.

Sure, the victim was really dumb, but so what? A lot of financial fraud takes advantage of stupid people and that doesn't get the people committing the fraud off the hook.

Financial fraud is quite different. It's thievery on a different level.

I seriously don't see how, other than some serious embarrassment, the "victim" was harmed in any way.

Now, as somebody stated earlier in the thread, if the victim has some documented mental disorder (hard to argue she doesn't after all this) I could see where some more serious punishment is called for.

The perpetrator was absolutely wrong to do what she did. No question about it.

Because it's in the news so much recently, think of the 5 guys who watched and videoed that man drowning. No charges filed. Yes, some lawyers and such are trying to figure out how to charge them with something.

This wasn't a case of the victim being drugged. I've not read about high levels of alcohol. No pot. No force used.
The victim was absolutely fine with everything happening, including the sex, all the way up until she removed her blindfold.

Embarrassing? Sure.
Stupid? Sure.

6.5 years in prison and a record of sexual assault???

How about charging the perp with fraud? Make the penalty something with a stiff monetary fine, plus community service?
$10,000 plus 500 hours in a sexual assault crisis center?

Does hurting somebody's feelings warrant 6.5 years in prison?
 
Fraud? Or Fantasy?
She said / She said
If you go to a baseball game and get hit by a foul ball, you have assumed that risk.
Except in cases involving physical coercion or children or animals, all sexual assault law should be struck from the books. ;)
 
Other than stupidity....

Woman who wore fake penis, tricked blindfolded friend into having sex with her sentenced | Fox News

[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]





So a woman is stupid enough to agree to wear a blindfold every single time she meets this girl, and even agrees to sex with a blindfold....

The level of oddness here is astounding.

I'm having trouble understanding a crime of sexual assault. It was consensual sex. Blindfolded, but consensual. Idiotic, but consensual.

Other than gross-stupidity, was a crime committed here? Deserving of 6+ years in prison?

I'd say it was probably rape.
 
not to be crude but unless it was one of those squirting toys how did she not know?
i mean unless she had never had sex before she should know what a real one feels like vs a fake one.
when i goes on for hours and hours and it still hasn't cum yet that should be a clue.

the latest study shows about 7 minutes after penetration not including foreplay.
(note this is an average millage may very)

sex by deceit is an interesting topic to discuss.

There was finally a girl in NE area that was finally caught and sentenced to jail for something similar but it wasn't before she sent 6 other guys to jail
she kept saying she was 18 or 19 and she was 16 and then reporting them.
 
Other than stupidity....

Woman who wore fake penis, tricked blindfolded friend into having sex with her sentenced | Fox News

[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]





So a woman is stupid enough to agree to wear a blindfold every single time she meets this girl, and even agrees to sex with a blindfold....

The level of oddness here is astounding.

I'm having trouble understanding a crime of sexual assault. It was consensual sex. Blindfolded, but consensual. Idiotic, but consensual.

Other than gross-stupidity, was a crime committed here? Deserving of 6+ years in prison?

No wonder Melania can't find her blindfold! That dastardly British woman stole it! :mad:
 
Back
Top Bottom