[W:89: 591]Swedish Police Officer: 'Muslim Countries Provide Most Criminals in Sweden' [W:89]

[Sandokan]

1. that is nonsense, stating what is obvious is not name calling.

2. no, vehement disagreement makes the thread because almost all people think the views are totally nonsensical.

3.. the so called feminist government is only something from the last few years and calling it feminist because it voices equal rights is not a problem IMHO. The problem is not equality for women it is inequality for women for women and only the idiot right wing in Sweden according to the article you submitted, do not include feminism/equal rights for women in their party program, it is not an issue in Sweden except for the extreme right.

1. Obviously, we agree to disagree in this one.

2. For you, emotion no reason, is what make the thread, and the views are “totally” meaningless. Certainly views are important for the Debate Politics forum, due to the fact that the number of times a thread is viewed indicates whether a discussion topic is broadly captivating among people. More views means the content of the thread become more influential, popular. This is the main reason the forum has a column to keep track of views, which is used to determine the activity of the thread.

3. State feminism is not a new concept, since prior to 1995 had been used in Scandinavian countries to describe public policies that promote gender equality. Your rant against the “the idiot right wing in Sweden according to the article”, has nothing to do with the article. I am interested to read Sweden Democrats party program. I would appreciated if you provide a link to SD party program.

By the way, you have not provide a link that confirm your statement of the percent of women that voted by each of the parties. Nor do you have provided references, sources or links that validate the statistics you have posted about middle-eastern men.

 

[Sandokan]

Sweden extends border controls, citing continued 'threat'
Sweden extends border controls, citing continued 'threat' - The Local

TT/The Local
news@thelocal.se
@thelocalsweden
7 February 2019
14:58 CET+01:00

Sweden announced on Thursday that it will extend border control measures for an additional three months.

With the latest extension, the border checks will now remain in place through May 11th.

"The decision is based on the government's assessment that there is a threat to public order and internal security in Sweden,” a government press release stated.

In autumn 2015, Sweden introduced border checks on car and train traffic at the Öresund Bridge, as well as at ports in Varberg, Gothenburg, Malmö, Helsingborg and Trelleborg. The measures were in response to the large influx of migrants into the country.
Click link above for full article

Mostly muslin refugees in Europe went to Sweden due to the friendly immigration policies and welfare generosity. The policy measures on stricter asylum process and border control by the government has the object to gain popular support and substrate public support from the Sweden Democrats, otherwise the parties in control of the government risks losing it.

In 2015 Sweden took in 163,000 refugees which created a refugee crisis, making it one of the top issues. The rise of anti-refugee sentiment moved the government to impose stricter measures on the asylum process and border control. In May 2018, Immigration Minister Helene Fritzon said Sweden should accept between 14,000 and 15,000 refugees a year.

 

[Peter King]

By the way, you have not provide a link that confirm your statement of the percent of women that voted by each of the parties. Nor do you have provided references, sources or links that validate the statistics you have posted about middle-eastern men.

And I will if you post something behind the message I actually wrote something in rather than making a statement with no link to where I made those comments.

 

[Sandokan]

The Sweden Democrats, campaigning on anti-immigration and a rise in crime, support for social security and universal healthcare, obtain 17.5% of the vote and 62 seats. SD made the immigration issue the main focus of attention, given it the opportunity to influence policy and a force to be reckoned with. The mainstream media refer to the SD as a party with neo-Nazi roots, implying that its supporters may be neo-Nazi sympathizers or racists. Name calling did not worked in the resent election.

 

[Peter King]

The Sweden Democrats, campaigning on anti-immigration and a rise in crime, support for social security and universal healthcare, obtain 17.5% of the vote and 62 seats. SD made the immigration issue the main focus of attention, given it the opportunity to influence policy and a force to be reckoned with. The mainstream media refer to the SD as a party with neo-Nazi roots, implying that its supporters may be neo-Nazi sympathizers or racists. Name calling did not worked in the resent election.

which also means that 82.2% of Swedes want nothing to do with that xenofobic hateful bunch of SD politicians. And if you are trying to go full nazi, hatemongering on one side and giving "presents" for white struggling Swedes, you will get a nice bunch of votes behind you but let us be honest. This is about a populist group of politicians who are trying to get as many votes by being more left wing on social issues so that they can stick it to the country on the other issues. We have a party like that here too, the PVV of Wilders. A very left sounding social sound on a very few issues (which they touted as much as they could) like not increasing the pension age to over 65, but when they got chosen as to support the cabinet/government as unofficial support faction of the government (not really being part of the government but on the fringes giving their full support to a right right government) they chucked the pension support out immediately for some vague promises on immigrations (that never happened) so they showed their true colours. They did not care about pensions or anything else in their party program. All they cared about was muslims. The SD will be the same. Really bad name also, the SD is the name of intelligence part of the SS. They should have chosen a better name IMHO.

 

[truthatallcost]

which also means that 82.2% of Swedes want nothing to do with that xenofobic hateful bunch of SD politicians. And if you are trying to go full nazi, hatemongering on one side and giving "presents" for white struggling Swedes, you will get a nice bunch of votes behind you but let us be honest. This is about a populist group of politicians who are trying to get as many votes by being more left wing on social issues so that they can stick it to the country on the other issues. We have a party like that here too, the PVV of Wilders. A very left sounding social sound on a very few issues (which they touted as much as they could) like not increasing the pension age to over 65, but when they got chosen as to support the cabinet/government as unofficial support faction of the government (not really being part of the government but on the fringes giving their full support to a right right government) they chucked the pension support out immediately for some vague promises on immigrations (that never happened) so they showed their true colours. They did not care about pensions or anything else in their party program. All they cared about was muslims. The SD will be the same. Really bad name also, the SD is the name of intelligence part of the SS. They should have chosen a better name IMHO.

Haha. AfD was polling at only 2% in early 2016, up to nearly 20% only a few years later. Like I told you, leftists create the need for right wing parties to come straighten out the messes they create. Smearing a political party which you yourself admit had no real politcal power for what those in government chose to do with pensions is just faulty thinking, and bad posting.

Review Europe in the 1920s-30s. Countries that went communist experienced genocide, starvation, and more. Countries like Italy and Germany experienced economic booms after going right wing. This is usually the case. Only after bad policy which stressed imperialist expansion did Italy and Germany do themselves in.

 

[Peter King]

Haha. AfD was polling at only 2% in early 2016, up to nearly 20% only a few years later. Like I told you, leftists create the need for right wing parties to come straighten out the messes they create. Smearing a political party which you yourself admit had no real politcal power for what those in government chose to do with pensions is just faulty thinking, and bad posting.

Review Europe in the 1920s-30s. Countries that went communist experienced genocide, starvation, and more. Countries like Italy and Germany experienced economic booms after going right wing. This is usually the case. Only after bad policy which stressed imperialist expansion did Italy and Germany do themselves in.

And? Afd is a bunch of muslim haters and they are populists, not unlike the nazi's were in the end of the 20's except they hated on Jews rather than the Afd which hates on muslims.

And we have to review the 20's and 30's in Europe for only one thing, to never repeat the horror and the crimes of populist nationalist hate mongers.

 

[truthatallcost]

And? Afd is a bunch of muslim haters and they are populists, not unlike the nazi's were in the end of the 20's except they hated on Jews rather than the Afd which hates on muslims.

Once again Peter, review what occurred in the 1920's. Germany was forced into economic ruin by Versailles, which had them paying exorbitant sums of money to French central bankers. The socialist SPD party held power in Germany at this time, and also had voted to enter WW1. Communist led attempts at revolution in Germany, in 1919 & 1921, with Jews leading both movements, just as they had in Russia years prior. In the 1921 attempt, 35 police officers were killed before the commie plot was put down.
German cities like Berlin and Hamburg were thrown into poverty, with many German women who'd previously been middle class having to resort to sex work to survive. Some of Germany's feelings of having been overtaken by non-Germans were correct in my view.

And we have to review the 20's and 30's in Europe for only one thing, to never repeat the horror and the crimes of populist nationalist hate mongers.

Then you'd better pray that the economic conditions of Europe never fall short, because the moment things become as bad as 1920s life under stupid socialist rule (Weimar) I can guarantee that the Germans will once again bare their teeth and seek vengeance on all those who've tried to punish them for no fault of their own.

 

[Peter King]

Once again Peter, review what occurred in the 1920's. Germany was forced into economic ruin by Versailles, which had them paying exorbitant sums of money to French central bankers. The socialist SPD party held power in Germany at this time, and also had voted to enter WW1. Communist led attempts at revolution in Germany, in 1919 & 1921, with Jews leading both movements, just as they had in Russia years prior. In the 1921 attempt, 35 police officers were killed before the commie plot was put down.
German cities like Berlin and Hamburg were thrown into poverty, with many German women who'd previously been middle class having to resort to sex work to survive. Some of Germany's feelings of having been overtaken by non-Germans were correct in my view.

Yes, they had to pay a lot of money because they STARTED A WAR!! Was it stupid by the French, English, etc. etc. to demand a lot of money, sure but by 1933 Germany had only paid 1/8th of the money they should have paid. And in 1932 the Lausanne Conference suspended the payments of the defeated countries as mentioned in the Treaty of Versailles.

The reason the Germany Germany was forced into economic ruin was mostly not due to the financial responsibilities of Versailles. The issue of the Weimar republic was mostly staved of in 1924 due to US loans to Germany, and I mean a lot of loans. The moderate parties reaped the rewards the SPD increased their power in the Reichstag with a swing of 3.8% to the social democrats and a 1.6% swing to the communists.

The real reason for the economic ruin was the US lending practices in which banks were loaning money to people hand over fist so that they could buy stocks and increase their wealth. Then came the Wall Street crash in 1929, the banks were hit with huge money problems so they recalled their loans to Germany. That lead to the financial hardship for the Germans, high unemployment and the move towards extremist groups and the end of the Weimar republic.

And again with the Jew obsession. You are have real clue about the reasons for the second world war and the rise of the Nazi party and their stupid ass hatred of Jews. The success (supposed success) of Jews in Europe had little to do with the Jews but was caused by the non-Jews. Jews were bankers, traders, shop owners, etc. etc. etc. BECAUSE of the centuries of Jew hatred in Europe. They could not own land, in almost all countries they were not allowed to learn a skilled trade because trades guilds kept the Jews out due to them not being christians. In the Netherlands we mostly did the same thing. So they went into trading and things like the diamond trade and diamond business, as they did in banks and many other jobs that did not rely on land ownership or being allowed to do a skilled trade like carpentry and just about any skilled job.

Non-Jews did not like trading, they worked the land, worked in carpentry, bricklayers, artists, etc. etc. etc. which Jews were not allowed to do and were really respected in those times. And when they did get into those business opportunities they whined about the fact that Jews (who they forced into those jobs) were better at it.

And your claim that the SPD held power in Germany in 1914: lamo They may have had 35% of the votes, they got only 110 out of the 397 seats in the house. The real power was the Emperor, not the parliament. The kanzler (leader of the government) was held in power by conservatives and centre political parties. Sure the SPD voted for war credit AFTER the war had started.

And sure there were Communist attempts at revolution (failed ones) but there was also a NAZI revolution but you seemed to have missed that one there.

Then you'd better pray that the economic conditions of Europe never fall short, because the moment things become as bad as 1920s life under stupid socialist rule (Weimar) I can guarantee that the Germans will once again bare their teeth and seek vengeance on all those who've tried to punish them for no fault of their own.

Europe is immensely wealthy compared to that time. No longer are there Emperor and their huge powerful countries. Democracy is the gold standard of political systems in Europe now. Things are never going to go back to the 1920. Also there is the EU and the UN. War in Europe is as far from likely as is humanly possible now. We leave in a golden age of peace. War and fighting European nations are no longer on the table.

 

[truthatallcost]

Yes, they had to pay a lot of money because they STARTED A WAR!!

Russia mobilized for war before Austria-Hungary & Germany, giving the logical impression that they were preparing to strike. Had Russia allowed the dispute between A-H & Serbia to be settled without outside intervention.

Was it stupid by the French, English, etc. etc. to demand a lot of money, sure...

Greed is always stupid, as it leads to friction and eventually warfare. The modern day equivalent of the sum demanded by the French at Versailles, is nearly $1 trillion.. Of course such a demand today would plunge any country into economic upheaval and ruin.

"Treaty of Versailles signed on 28th June 1919 was the work of International Bankers. They took all the measures necessary to ensure the next WW2. The British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, wrote: 'The international bankers swept statesmen, politicians, journalists and jurists all to one side and issued their orders with the imperiousness of absolute monarchs. Upon returning from the unsuccessful Peace Conference at Versailles, President Wilson stated, "There is a secret force at work in Europe which we were unable to trace."

The secret force was Rothschild clan, which dominated the conference.

The American President, Woodrow Wilson, was "advised" at Versailles Conference by Bernard Baruch, The British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, was "advised" by Alfred Milner, Rothschild employee, and Sir Phillip Sassoon, a direct descendent of Mayer Amschel Rothschild, The French leader, Georges Clemenceau, was "advised" by his Minister for the Interior, Georges Mandel, whose real name was Jeroboam Rothschild.

LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: War-Treaty of Versailles 1919.

Greed is at the heart of modern day European leadership such as Macron and Merkel, working at the behest of the globalist elite.

...but by 1933 Germany had only paid 1/8th of the money they should have paid.

Hitler told France to **** themselves, the appropriate response. Germany could use a strong leader today, in order to remove the globalist fangs from the necks of the people.

And in 1932 the Lausanne Conference suspended the payments of the defeated countries as mentioned in the Treaty of Versailles.

By that time it was too late; the failed leadership the victorious countries which was and is always compromised by the international banking cartel, in conjunction with the SDP's failed leadership during the Weimar years, and many attempts by non-German communists trying to create revolution had FULLY AWAKENED the German people. They decided to grasp their own destiny in their hands, rather than leaving it up to these evil outside influences finally.

The reason the Germany Germany was forced into economic ruin was mostly not due to the financial responsibilities of Versailles.

The moderate parties reaped the rewards the SPD increased their power in the Reichstag with a swing of 3.8% to the social democrats and a 1.6% swing to the communists.

True healing did not occur until 1933, and the central bankers were sent packing, the reparations for French bankers was ended, and ethnic Germans were finally freed from the cabal of the parasitic source which was draining their blood from them.

 

[Peter King]

Russia mobilized for war before Austria-Hungary & Germany, giving the logical impression that they were preparing to strike. Had Russia allowed the dispute between A-H & Serbia to be settled without outside intervention.



Greed is always stupid, as it leads to friction and eventually warfare. The modern day equivalent of the sum demanded by the French at Versailles, is nearly $1 trillion.. Of course such a demand today would plunge any country into economic upheaval and ruin.

"Treaty of Versailles signed on 28th June 1919 was the work of International Bankers. They took all the measures necessary to ensure the next WW2. The British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, wrote: 'The international bankers swept statesmen, politicians, journalists and jurists all to one side and issued their orders with the imperiousness of absolute monarchs. Upon returning from the unsuccessful Peace Conference at Versailles, President Wilson stated, "There is a secret force at work in Europe which we were unable to trace."

The secret force was Rothschild clan, which dominated the conference.

The American President, Woodrow Wilson, was "advised" at Versailles Conference by Bernard Baruch, The British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, was "advised" by Alfred Milner, Rothschild employee, and Sir Phillip Sassoon, a direct descendent of Mayer Amschel Rothschild, The French leader, Georges Clemenceau, was "advised" by his Minister for the Interior, Georges Mandel, whose real name was Jeroboam Rothschild.

LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: War-Treaty of Versailles 1919.

Greed is at the heart of modern day European leadership such as Macron and Merkel, working at the behest of the globalist elite.



Hitler told France to **** themselves, the appropriate response. Germany could use a strong leader today, in order to remove the globalist fangs from the necks of the people.



By that time it was too late; the failed leadership the victorious countries which was and is always compromised by the international banking cartel, in conjunction with the SDP's failed leadership during the Weimar years, and many attempts by non-German communists trying to create revolution had FULLY AWAKENED the German people. They decided to grasp their own destiny in their hands, rather than leaving it up to these evil outside influences finally.





True healing did not occur until 1933, and the central bankers were sent packing, the reparations for French bankers was ended, and ethnic Germans were finally freed from the cabal of the parasitic source which was draining their blood from them.

Great a history lesson of someone totally uninformed about the reasons of the German collapse. All kinds of things were thrown around but none of it is the reason the German economy crashed.

But I do see your anti-Jewish thing yet again, for no particular reason but why would that matter.

Fact is that the German economy failed because it was asked to pay back the loans of the US. Pure and simple. The bad times for the German economy started in 1929, the year of the crash and the beginning of the great depression.

You clearly have no clue about German history. Also, non-German communists? That is stupid talk, the communists in Germany were GERMANS!

Try learning about about actual German history, I think our German friends here on the forum can tell you even better than I can (even though I studied this for years and years) that you clearly have no idea about German interbellum (time between the end of the first and the start of the second world war) history or European Interbellum history.

 

[Sandokan]

which also means that 82.2% of Swedes want nothing to do with that xenofobic hateful bunch of SD politicians. And if you are trying to go full nazi, hatemongering on one side and giving "presents" for white struggling Swedes, you will get a nice bunch of votes behind you but let us be honest. This is about a populist group of politicians who are trying to get as many votes by being more left wing on social issues so that they can stick it to the country on the other issues. We have a party like that here too, the PVV of Wilders. A very left sounding social sound on a very few issues (which they touted as much as they could) like not increasing the pension age to over 65, but when they got chosen as to support the cabinet/government as unofficial support faction of the government (not really being part of the government but on the fringes giving their full support to a right right government) they chucked the pension support out immediately for some vague promises on immigrations (that never happened) so they showed their true colours. They did not care about pensions or anything else in their party program. All they cared about was muslims. The SD will be the same. Really bad name also, the SD is the name of intelligence part of the SS. They should have chosen a better name IMHO.

In 2018 the Social Democrats received 28.6% of the vote, down 11.4% from the 39.9% of the 2002 election. In 2018 the Sweden Democrats received 17.5% of the votes, up 16.1% from the 1.44% of the 2002 election. Sweden Democrats has been gaining people support at the polls.

A very good showing for a party that according to you “Swedes want nothing to do with that xenofobic hateful bunch of SD politicians.” Because immigration have become a major issue in EU countries, the political compass is moving to the center-right. The writing is on the wall.

Elections………….......2002….2006…2010…2014….2018
Social Democrats…..39.85…35.0….30.7…31.0…..28.26
Sweden Democrats..1.44…...2.93….5.7…12.86…17.53
Moderate Party……..15.26….26.23..30.1..23.33..19.84

 

[german hick]

Try learning about about actual German history, I think our German friends here on the forum can tell you even better than I can (even though I studied this for years and years) that you clearly have no idea about German interbellum (time between the end of the first and the start of the second world war) history or European Interbellum history.

What Peter says

plus: SDP is a funny band here - SPD never was communist ;o)

We had the "golden 20´s" here after the first world war - until the crash came - if Weimar was such a mess - how could that have happened?

for the question who started the 1. WW: for me it was national pride - of the German, British, Russian and French Imperiums. All right wing policy you see ;o)

 

[Chagos]

Russia mobilized for war before Austria-Hungary & Germany, giving the logical impression that they were preparing to strike. Had Russia allowed the dispute between A-H & Serbia to be settled without outside intervention...............~

with the rest simply serving to demonstrate what pitfalls you encounter with each one of your feeble attempts at dabbling in history, lets's just, for the sake of demonstration, take this particular clanger.

Russia mobilized two days after Austria-Hungary invaded Serbia.

The secret force was Rothschild clan, which dominated the conference.

BS fed by your anti-semitic BS frenzy

LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: War-Treaty of Versailles 1919.

BS from a BS blog (fed by your anti-semitic BS frenzy).

All in all, another one of your consistent failures.

Congratulations.:roll:

 

[Chagos]

Great a history lesson of someone totally uninformed about the reasons of the German collapse. All kinds of things were thrown around but none of it is the reason the German economy crashed.

But I do see your anti-Jewish thing yet again, for no particular reason but why would that matter..................~

Oh, there's a reason all right. Commonly known as the obsession that all Jew-haters suffer from (or should I say "enjoy"?).

 

[truthatallcost]

Fact is that the German economy failed because it was asked to pay back the loans of the US. Pure and simple. The bad times for the German economy started in 1929, the year of the crash and the beginning of the great depression.

You left out the hyperinflation period of 1922, under Haverstein. You are no expert Peter.

You clearly have no clue about German history. Also, non-German communists? That is stupid talk, the communists in Germany were GERMANS!

Bela Kun was Hungarian. Kun was sent to Germany by Lenin in 1921 to destabilize and push for communist revolution. He failed, and so did you.

Other notable communists who infiltrated Germany-

- Rosa Luxemburg, Polish Jew
- Eugen Levine, Russian Jew
- Karl Radek, Lithuanian Jew
- Leo Jogiches, Polish Jew

etc, etc I'm pressed for time, so I must leave the list incomplete. But you get the idea, I hope. Of course there were ethnic Germans in the communist movement is the day, but the leading subversives were disproportionally foreign born, and Jewish.

Try learning about about actual German history...

Blah, blah, blah. Practice what you preach Peter King.

 

[Peter King]

You left out the hyperinflation period of 1922, under Haverstein. You are no expert Peter.

And after that thing became a lot better in the Weimar republic, you are talking about a year in the Weimar republic, after that year things went from bad to good, only to be undone by the stock market crash of 1929

Bela Kun was Hungarian. Kun was sent to Germany by Lenin in 1921 to destabilize and push for communist revolution. He failed, and so did you.

Other notable communists who infiltrated Germany-

- Rosa Luxemburg, Polish Jew
- Eugen Levine, Russian Jew
- Karl Radek, Lithuanian Jew
- Leo Jogiches, Polish Jew

etc, etc I'm pressed for time, so I must leave the list incomplete. But you get the idea, I hope. Of course there were ethnic Germans in the communist movement is the day, but the leading subversives were disproportionally foreign born, and Jewish.

Yes, I know, you are obsessed with jews so it seems.

Bela Kun as you call him was born Béla Kohn, he was born in Austria-Hungaria and born in a region where about 1/8th was German and most were Romanian was it was technically what we now know as Transylvania. He studied in a city called Klausenburg (as the region was originally a German speaking university. He served in the Austria/Hungarian army and was captured by the Russians in 1916. He was sent to Austria/Hungaria and that is where he spent most of his time. True, he was in Germany in 1921 in one German region, he was not there to destabilize all of Germany and as said, he was unsuccessful. As are your pathetic attempts to make this into a Jewish and foreign led organization. Because:

1. Karl Radek was an atheist, he may have been born Jewish but he was not when he was a commie. Also, he was not a Lithuanian Jew. He was born in Lemberg, At the time part of Austria-Hungaria

2. Jogiches, Levine and Luxemburg died January 15th 1919. They were not even alive during almost all of the Weimar republic. Radek that you mentioned was arrested in January 1919 and by January 1920 he was in Moscow. So also not a big influence on the German communists. The KPD (communist party of Germany) was started by Liebknecht (German), Luxemburg and Levi (German).

In other words, by the time the Weimar republic was going strong, most if not all the people in your Jew/Foreigner comments were either:

dead (three of them)
in Russia (one)
only briefly associated with Germany (Béla Kohn)

Strong position and totally passes the reality that most communist leaders were German and by the end of the Weimar republic and the start of the Hitler regime, most were put in camps, let to die in camps or killed by the Nazi's.

Blah, blah, blah. Practice what you preach Peter King.

Except I know what I am talking about, you don't really when it comes to the interwar period.

 

[truthatallcost]

with the rest simply serving to demonstrate what pitfalls you encounter with each one of your feeble attempts at dabbling in history, lets's just, for the sake of demonstration, take this particular clanger.

Russia mobilized two days after Austria-Hungary invaded Serbia.BS fed by your anti-semitic BS frenzy

BS from a BS blog (fed by your anti-semitic BS frenzy).

All in all, another one of your consistent failures.

Congratulations.:roll:

The blogger appears to know more than our failing 'expert' known as Chagos.

"In 1916, Baruch left Wall Street to advise President Woodrow Wilson on national defense and terms of peace. ... With his leadership, this body successfully managed the US's economic mobilization during World War I. In 1919, Wilson asked Baruch to serve as a staff member at the Paris Peace Conference."

Bernard Baruch - Wikipedia

Milner was much like Churchill; a pawn of the Rothschild banking dynasty through financial contribution. Churchill was horrible with money, having no skills at budgeting, and the Rothschild family gave him an allowance to do chores, if you will.

It's no secret that Versailles was influenced by the banking cartel Chagos. Only the naive or dishonest think that politicians aren't the
puppets of bankers and business leaders.

 

[Chagos]

The blogger appears to know more than our failing 'expert' known as Chagos..............~

unsuccessful attempt to deflect from your consistent and continuous knowledge failures noted.

Notably your clanger over Russia having mobilized before A-H and Germany, now having fallen conveniently right off the table.

But how like you to then storm off at a different angle and cite some silly blogspot on something completely different and how like you to show your unawareness of how your posts become more and more irrelevant with every one of such moves.

Well, at least you didn't entertain us with a faked blurb-tube offering this time.:roll:

 

[truthatallcost]

And after that thing became a lot better in the Weimar republic, you are talking about a year in the Weimar republic, after that year things went from bad to good, only to be undone by the stock market crash of 1929

Rubbish. The entire Weimar period was marked by instability, political extremism, and the parasitic outsiders preying upon Germany.

Yes, I know, you are obsessed with jews so it seems.

What's the prevailing propaganda of today about Marx? Oh yes, I believe they try to say that he was Lutheran, lol. Just another antisemitic Lutheran, nothing to see here folks!

Bela Kun as you call him...

I call him what he called himself. Had I been the one to mention his real surname, I'd been accused of antisemitism!

...was born Béla Kohn, he was born in Austria-Hungaria and born in a region where about 1/8th was German and most were Romanian was it was technically what we now know as Transylvania. He studied in a city called Klausenburg (as the region was originally a German speaking university. He served in the Austria/Hungarian army and was captured by the Russians in 1916. He was sent to Austria/Hungaria and that is where he spent most of his time. True, he was in Germany in 1921 in one German region, he was not there to destabilize all of Germany and as said, he was unsuccessful. As are your pathetic attempts to make this into a Jewish and foreign led organization.

This is crap-

• Bela Kun was in no way German, rather he was part of one of the many minorities in Hungary at the time.

• Before the 1921 March Action in Germany, Kun had operated on the behalf of Lenin for communist revolution in Hungary, which is known as the Hungarian Soviet Republic Revolution of 1919. This attempt at revolution failed too.

• After the failed attempt in Hungary, Kun enacted a strategy of fomenting unrest in specific industrialized cities which had legitimate worker's complaints. The hope was after seizing whole towns through communist revolt, a domino effect would commence, which Russia could help effect.

Because:

1. Karl Radek was an atheist, he may have been born Jewish but he was not when he was a commie. Also, he was not a Lithuanian Jew. He was born in Lemberg, At the time part of Austria-Hungaria

Jews consider themselves a separate ethnicity, or race Peter. In fact, most communists are atheists, or irreligious, regardless of their background. Why do racial purity laws exist in Israel? Because the distinction of being Jewish is not solely related to the practice of Judaism.

2. Jogiches, Levine and Luxemburg died January 15th 1919. They were not even alive during almost all of the Weimar republic. Radek that you mentioned was arrested in January 1919 and by January 1920 he was in Moscow. So also not a big influence on the German communists.

The Weimar Republic is considered to have lasted from 1918-1933. The idea that Luxemburg was 'not a big influence' on German communists is a laughing stock. Here's the Rosa Luxemburg tribute statue in Berlin, to accompany the Marx and Engels statues. Notice the large Polish nose which smells opportunity in Germany, lol.

File:Rosa Luxemburg ND4.JPG - Wikimedia Commons

The KPD (communist party of Germany) was started by Liebknecht (German)

Liebknecht's mother's maiden name was Reh, an Ashkenazi variant of the German surname Rech.

Luxemburg

Polish Jew. The same one you just said didn't influence German communists :lamo

and Levi (German).

Jewish.

Paul Levi - Wikipedia

In other words, by the time the Weimar republic was going strong, most if not all the people in your Jew/Foreigner comments were either:

dead (three of them)
in Russia (one)
only briefly associated with Germany (Béla Kohn)

Lol, and what of the failed Zionist Socialists like Eduard Bernstein? Or the Foreign Minister Rathenau who was slowly leading Germany into alliance, and possibly dependence on Russia? These men were Jewish as well. For Jews being 1-2% of Europe, why were they constantly the influential commie revolutionaries? The SPD leadership which couldn't alleviate poverty? The conspirators aligning with Soviet Russia?

Strong position and totally passes the reality that most communist leaders were German and by the end of the Weimar republic and the start of the Hitler regime, most were put in camps, let to die in camps or killed by the Nazi's.

All's well that ends well.

Except I know what I am talking about, you don't really when it comes to the interwar period.

Clearly you don't.

 

[Peter King]

Rubbish. The entire Weimar period was marked by instability, political extremism, and the parasitic outsiders preying upon Germany.



What's the prevailing propaganda of today about Marx? Oh yes, I believe they try to say that he was Lutheran, lol. Just another antisemitic Lutheran, nothing to see here folks!



I call him what he called himself. Had I been the one to mention his real surname, I'd been accused of antisemitism!



This is crap-

• Bela Kun was in no way German, rather he was part of one of the many minorities in Hungary at the time.

• Before the 1921 March Action in Germany, Kun had operated on the behalf of Lenin for communist revolution in Hungary, which is known as the Hungarian Soviet Republic Revolution of 1919. This attempt at revolution failed too.

• After the failed attempt in Hungary, Kun enacted a strategy of fomenting unrest in specific industrialized cities which had legitimate worker's complaints. The hope was after seizing whole towns through communist revolt, a domino effect would commence, which Russia could help effect.



Jews consider themselves a separate ethnicity, or race Peter. In fact, most communists are atheists, or irreligious, regardless of their background. Why do racial purity laws exist in Israel? Because the distinction of being Jewish is not solely related to the practice of Judaism.



The Weimar Republic is considered to have lasted from 1918-1933. The idea that Luxemburg was 'not a big influence' on German communists is a laughing stock. Here's the Rosa Luxemburg tribute statue in Berlin, to accompany the Marx and Engels statues. Notice the large Polish nose which smells opportunity in Germany, lol.

File:Rosa Luxemburg ND4.JPG - Wikimedia Commons




Liebknecht's mother's maiden name was Reh, an Ashkenazi variant of the German surname Rech.




Polish Jew. The same one you just said didn't influence German communists :lamo



Jewish.

Paul Levi - Wikipedia



Lol, and what of the failed Zionist Socialists like Eduard Bernstein? Or the Foreign Minister Rathenau who was slowly leading Germany into alliance, and possibly dependence on Russia? These men were Jewish as well. For Jews being 1-2% of Europe, why were they constantly the influential commie revolutionaries? The SPD leadership which couldn't alleviate poverty? The conspirators aligning with Soviet Russia?



All's well that ends well.



Clearly you don't.

All I see someone obsessed with Judaism and Jews. Also, Judaism is a religion, communists like all those who you mentioned are no longer religious (9 out of 10) because communism is free from religion (that is their mantra). All I see is you whining about people fighting for what they thought was right as a way to make the world more equal and fair. To fight injustice and whiny little conservatives who are so used to power that they really got butthurt when their power was being challenged. Your whole views are nonsensical and useless towards a discussion about Germany because you seem obsessed (as you usually are) about money, Jews, foreigners, immigrants, left leaning groups and muslims.

You are not discussing things, you have venting useless and very biased nonsense. So what if Rosa was Jewish or non-German. She was in the German parliament, she led a German party which she started with Germans, which voters were mostly German.

You think of Europe as a region with lots of strictly separated states, which was nonsense at the time. Super powers were in power in most of non-Western Europe. The Russians had loads of ground, including land that is now different countries, Germany had a lot of foreigners in their borders, the German empire spread to more than what is now Germany and the same goes for Austria-Hungary. Between the three empires, Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary they contained most of what are now independent countries but that were then just part of the Empire.

Poland as you see it was divided up as part of the Russian and German empire, before WW1 Poland was either German or Russian. Luxemburg I suspect was born in Russian Poland and fled the Czarist powers into Germany, not something that strange but to you it is massively important to a degree I do not understand but most make sense in your mind and your mind alone IMO.

You see strict borders and defined countries in Middle and Eastern Europe where they did not exist. Making someone born in Hungary part of a German Austrian/Hungarian empire.

I am sorry but your views just are not historically correct just because you keep stressing them being born from the Jewish parents. Totally historically inconsequential to the roles they played in European history.

 

[truthatallcost]

All I see someone obsessed with Judaism and Jews. Also, Judaism is a religion, communists like all those who you mentioned are no longer religious (9 out of 10) because communism is free from religion (that is their mantra). All I see is you whining about people fighting for what they thought was right as a way to make the world more equal and fair. To fight injustice and whiny little conservatives who are so used to power that they really got butthurt when their power was being challenged. Your whole views are nonsensical and useless towards a discussion about Germany because you seem obsessed (as you usually are) about money, Jews, foreigners, immigrants, left leaning groups and muslims.

You are not discussing things, you have venting useless and very biased nonsense. So what if Rosa was Jewish or non-German. She was in the German parliament, she led a German party which she started with Germans, which voters were mostly German.

You think of Europe as a region with lots of strictly separated states, which was nonsense at the time. Super powers were in power in most of non-Western Europe. The Russians had loads of ground, including land that is now different countries, Germany had a lot of foreigners in their borders, the German empire spread to more than what is now Germany and the same goes for Austria-Hungary. Between the three empires, Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary they contained most of what are now independent countries but that were then just part of the Empire.

Poland as you see it was divided up as part of the Russian and German empire, before WW1 Poland was either German or Russian. Luxemburg I suspect was born in Russian Poland and fled the Czarist powers into Germany, not something that strange but to you it is massively important to a degree I do not understand but most make sense in your mind and your mind alone IMO.

You see strict borders and defined countries in Middle and Eastern Europe where they did not exist. Making someone born in Hungary part of a German Austrian/Hungarian empire.

I am sorry but your views just are not historically correct just because you keep stressing them being born from the Jewish parents. Totally historically inconsequential to the roles they played in European history.

And still no answer to why 1% of Europe's population dominated

- the birth of communism, Bolsheviks, Mensheviks
- the Russian Revolution, October Revolution, Red Terror acts of violence, famines against non-Jews, etc
- Communist plots for takeover throughout Europe
- the SPD and much of government decisions in Weimar Republic
- the major banking dynasties of Europe.

Again Peter, you must ask your conscience why 1% can escape criticism, when that 1% were responsible for much of the catastrophes of the 20th century.

 

[truthatallcost]

Back to the OP topic: According to SVT Nyheter, shootings classified as murder or attempted murder have increased by nearly 100% since 2012.

Antalet illegala vapen och skjutningar okar i landet | SVT Nyheter

We know that rape in Sweden is dismissed outright, but how will people dismiss this new finding?

 

[Peter King]

And still no answer to why 1% of Europe's population dominated

- the birth of communism, Bolsheviks, Mensheviks
- the Russian Revolution, October Revolution, Red Terror acts of violence, famines against non-Jews, etc
- Communist plots for takeover throughout Europe
- the SPD and much of government decisions in Weimar Republic
- the major banking dynasties of Europe.

Again Peter, you must ask your conscience why 1% can escape criticism, when that 1% were responsible for much of the catastrophes of the 20th century.

Jewish Bolshevism, also Judeo–Bolshevism, is an anti-communist and antisemitic canard, which alleges that the Jews were the originators of the Russian Revolution in 1917 and that they held the primary power among the Bolsheviks. Similarly, the conspiracy theory of Jewish Communism implies that Jews have dominated the Communist movements in the world, and is related to The Zionist Occupation Government conspiracy theory (ZOG), which asserts that Jews control world politics.

In 1917, after the October revolution, the catchword was the title of the pamphlet, The Jewish Bolshevism, which featured in the racist propaganda of the anti-communist White movement forces during the Russian Civil War (1918–22). The Nazi Party in Germany and the German-American Bund in the United States propagated the anti-Semitic theory to their followers, sympathisers, and fellow travellers during the 1930s.

Jewish Bolshevism - Wikipedia

All you are doing is reposting the same fake history lesson given to us in the past by all those who hate Jews. You may not hate Jews, how would I know because I only know you from here, but you keep posting nonsense straight out of the handbook of anti-semitic texts from a century ago.

And the reason why Jews were in banking and commerce was explained before I think.

One form of economic antisemitism in the Middle Ages was a mass of legal restrictions imposed on the occupations and professions of Jews. Local rulers and church officials closed many professions to the Jews, pushing them into marginal occupations considered socially inferior, such as tax- and rent-collecting and money-lending, but tolerated then as a "necessary evil".

Catholic doctrine then held that lending money for interest was a sin and forbade it to Christians. Not being subject to that restriction, Jews dominated this business. The Torah and the later sections of the Hebrew Bible criticise usury, but interpretations of the Biblical prohibition vary. Since few other occupations were open to them, Jews were motivated to take up money-lending. That was said to show Jews were usurers, which then led to many negative stereotypes and propaganda. Natural tensions between creditors, typically Jews, and debtors, typically Christians were added to social, political, religious and economic strains.

Peasants who were forced to pay their taxes to Jews could personify them as the people taking their earnings and remain loyal to the lords on whose behalf the Jews worked.

Also present in the Middle Ages was the coercion of Jews into being economic objects, possessions and even slaves by groups of nobles, as is evident in examples from the English code Leges Edwardi Confessoris. Jews were re-lcast into various economic occupational roles and so became a people that could be coveted, sold or traded for economic purposes by those in power at the time. That use of Jews also had political causes and ramifications in the time period, but the economic practice of using Jews to fill particular roles in economic sectors was prevalent.

Economic antisemitism - Wikipedia

Forcing Jews into a certain profession and then whining about it when it is later found to be profitable and something (due to centuries of practice) Jews are good at is being used by this anti-semitic jealousy practice in later centuries is bogus and used by people who are not successful themselves or just don't like Jews to make Jews hated, like was done in the Nazi period and in loads of periods before that time.

Your views on the might of the Jews is based on falsehoods from the last century and yet to this day fake stuff like this is being promoted the world over, especially in muslim countries but also in what supposedly are more advances societies.

Again, not accusing you of anti-semitism but you are using canards so to speak that are used by anti-semites the world over to promote hatred of Jews.

 

[Peter King]

Back to the OP topic: According to SVT Nyheter, shootings classified as murder or attempted murder have increased by nearly 100% since 2012.

Antalet illegala vapen och skjutningar okar i landet | SVT Nyheter

We know that rape in Sweden is dismissed outright, but how will people dismiss this new finding?

You do know that posting a Swedish article is nonsense. Nobody can read it and translations can be problematic as it is done by a computer when you "auto-translate it".

Unless you have an English source for this, I am going to not comment on it.