• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:775]Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Lovebug said:
Bernie cheated? How's so?
If there is any politician with integrity out there, it is Bernie, although he might be misguided at times.I call it being too trusting.
Click to expand...

Bernie was the victim of cheating.
 
dobieg said:
Comical considering every liberal out there had zero problem with Clinton using a British agent to get dirt from Russia on their political opponent.


I mean if you want us to continue laughing at your side, keeping feigning your horror over something your side is the master of.
Click to expand...

Not only that, but joking about China.
 
Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Mycroft said:
Bernie was the victim of cheating.
Click to expand...

You made it seem like Bernie did the cheating, but yes, he was a victim of the cheaters in chief. My goodness, she didn't win the election, but those 2 (Billary)are a force no one should have to face.
 
Lovebug said:
Have you anything to back that up? Beyond reasonable doubt?
To your second part, and putting on both my straight jacket and my tin foil hat, what if...the only reason we keep talking about this is because the Clintons?
Do you see where I am going? It all depends on the perspective. Given all circumstances, i like to think that both Hillary and Bill have much more accumulated favors than Trump.
Click to expand...

To back up what?
That the Trump Campaign was using the British company Cambridge Analytica?
Follow the links from the wiki page I gave or do a quick google search. It is common knowledge!


As for the second part (assuming the scenario I gave with Trump refusing to admit defeat after a possible close election), I am not sure if it is a really fetched scenario to imagine a case similar to Al Gore and Bush in which Trump becomes Al Gore. Do you really think that if a court in such a situation rules against Trump that the latter will then accept the decision?
As for the Clintons, I am not saying that the we not corrupt. But trying to equate the dirty laundry of a poltiician whoo has been for decades in politics to Trump who in the course of just three years has already accumulated a ton of dirty laundry does not make much sense. Not does it make sense to refuse to hold Trump accountable for certain things he says. And finally, why are we still talking about the Clintons? How relevant are they in the upcoming elections?
 
pamak said:
To back up what?
That the Trump Campaign was using the British company Cambridge Analytica?
Follow the links from the wiki page I gave or do a quick google search. It is common knowledge!


As for the second part (assuming the scenario I gave with Trump refusing to admit defeat after a possible close election), I am not sure if it is a really fetched scenario to imagine a case similar to Al Gore and Bush in which Trump becomes Al Gore. Do you really think that if a court in such a situation rules against Trump that the latter will then accept the decision?
As for the Clintons, I am not saying that the we not corrupt. But trying to equate the dirty laundry of a poltiician whoo has been for decades in politics to Trump who in the course of just three years has already accumulated a ton of dirty laundry does not make much sense. Not does it make sense to refuse to hold Trump accountable for certain things he says. And finally, why are we still talking about the Clintons? How relevant are they in the upcoming elections?
Click to expand...

Please back it up. Thank you.
 
This thread is like one big echo chamber, long on leftist propaganda, short on facts.
 
Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

The topic of this thread is the POTUS saying that his son did nothing illegal when he didn't inform the FBI about the Russian offer and then 45 said he would take help from them or others in the coming election, would not inform the FBI, even though it is against federal criminal law, a law he has sworn to uphold. That should be a concern for any American.
 
Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Parrish said:
The topic of this thread is the POTUS saying that his son did nothing illegal when he didn't inform the FBI about the Russian offer and then 45 said he would take help from them or others in the coming election, would not inform the FBI, even though it is against federal criminal law, a law he has sworn to uphold. That should be a concern for any American.
Click to expand...

Not if they didn't take them up on their offer.
 
Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Lovebug said:
Not if they didn't take them up on their offer.
Click to expand...

Junior took them up on their offer and 45 said he wouldn't either. POTUS is again saying he will welcome foreign interference and break federal criminal law in the coming election. You're okay with a POTUS who says he would willingly break the law and thinks he is above our nation's laws?
 
Lovebug said:
Please back it up. Thank you.
Click to expand...

Please be specific regarding what you want me to back up.
Again, is it that the Trump Campaign was using Cambridge Analytica for data analysis?

Here is the link I provided!

Cambridge Analytica - Wikipedia

Cambridge Analytica Ltd (CA) was a British political consulting firm which combined data mining, data brokerage, and data analysis with strategic communication during the electoral processes.[5][6] It was started in 2013 as an offshoot of the SCL Group.[7] The company closed operations in 2018 in the course of the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal, although related firms still exist.[8]

The company was partly owned by the family of Robert Mercer, an American hedge-fund manager who supports many politically conservative causes.[7][9] The firm maintained offices in London, New York City, and Washington, DC.[10] CEO Alexander Nix has said CA was involved in 44 US political races in 2014.[11] In 2015, CA performed data analysis services for Ted Cruz's presidential campaign.[9] In 2016, CA worked for Donald Trump's presidential campaign[12]


And here is Kushner talking in Forbes

Jared Kushner In His Own Words On The Trump Data Operation The FBI Is Reportedly Probing

“We found that Facebook and digital targeting were the most effective ways to reach the audiences. After the primary, we started ramping up because we knew that doing a national campaign is different than doing a primary campaign. That was when we formalized the system because we had to ramp up for digital fundraising. We brought in Cambridge Analytica[/COLOR]
 
Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Parrish said:
Junior took them up on their offer and 45 said he wouldn't either. POTUS is again saying he will welcome foreign interference and break federal criminal law in the coming election. You're okay with a POTUS who says he would willingly break the law and thinks he is above our nation's laws?
Click to expand...

and Hillary jokes about the Chinese. Last time I checked, beyond a reasonable doubt was still 'it', and one joke was as good as another.
 
Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Parrish said:
The topic of this thread is the POTUS saying that his son did nothing illegal when he didn't inform the FBI about the Russian offer and then 45 said he would take help from them or others in the coming election, would not inform the FBI, even though it is against federal criminal law, a law he has sworn to uphold. That should be a concern for any American.
Click to expand...

You have enough concern, a true representative for almost all inhabitants of planet yeranus.
I hope they pay you for all you're worth.



j/k
 
Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Lovebug said:
and Hillary jokes about the Chinese. Last time I checked, beyond a reasonable doubt was still 'it', and one joke was as good as another.
Click to expand...

You want to know why she really lost the election? She has always talked out of both sides.
 
Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Lovebug said:
and Hillary jokes about the Chinese. Last time I checked, beyond a reasonable doubt was still 'it', and one joke was as good as another.
Click to expand...

POTUS wasn't joking when he said he'd take help from foreign nationals for dirt on his opponents, break federal criminal law, commit a crime and violate the oath of office he took on 1/20/17.
 
Re: Trump: ‘I think I’d take’ damaging info on 2020 rival from foreign operatives

Parrish said:
POTUS wasn't joking when he said he'd take help from foreign nationals for dirt on his opponents, break federal criminal law, commit a crime and violate the oath of office he took on 1/20/17.
Click to expand...

and neither was Hillary. Ok.
 
dobieg said:
Comical considering every liberal out there had zero problem with Clinton using a British agent to get dirt from Russia on their political opponent.


I mean if you want us to continue laughing at your side, keeping feigning your horror over something your side is the master of.
Click to expand...

But if he insists he's okay with doing that, then his much ballyhooed investigation is a nothingburger.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom