• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:386]The President Is Trapped

It is always the same with your view... when you hit the word TRANSLATON it all falls apart.

Simply back up your original claim with VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE from national pollsters who predicted a Clinton first place finish that they used state polling and used it to make their predictions of Clintons win .

Let us see it.

Stop the dodging. You are still failing to own up to your misstating what I said. As for verifable evidence of national pollsters using state by state polling data to predict electoral college outcomes, what the hell do you think they use? Tarot Cards? Palm reading? I'll humor you:

Just How Badly Did the Pollsters Botch the Election? The Final Polls vs. the Final Results | The Daily Wire
 
Get back to me when you understand the difference between a civil case and a criminal case. Paying fines related to a civil case does not make one a criminal.

Doing something illegal makes you a criminal, right? That's what makes illegal immigrants criminals, right?

"Donald Trump has been ordered by a judge to pay $2m in damages for illegally using funds intended for charity to boost his 2016 presidential election campaign"

Donald Trump fined $2m for misusing charity for political ends | Donald Trump | The Guardian

This is the part of the story I really like...

"In the agreements, Trump admitted to misusing funds from the foundation, which he dissolved last year, including to pay for a portrait himself that cost $10,000. He also agreed to pay back $11,525 he spent on sports memorabilia and champagne at a charity gala."

Money people donated to a charity. Used to buy a portrait of himself and to buy Tim Tebow memorabilia. That's your boy Trump. Just a few years ago that kind of thing would be political suicide with both parties howling for blood but you Trumpelievers give him a pass on absolutely anything. Corrupt bastard, that's your Dear Leader.
 
Last edited:
Stop the dodging. You are still failing to own up to your misstating what I said. As for verifable evidence of national pollsters using state by state polling data to predict electoral college outcomes, what the hell do you think they use? Tarot Cards? Palm reading? I'll humor you:

Just How Badly Did the Pollsters Botch the Election? The Final Polls vs. the Final Results | The Daily Wire

This is you again trying to put me as the issue. Simply provide the methodology from national posters showing where used state polls to make their predictions.

Its been almost a week now and you still are coming up empty.

This is from your linked article

Instead, Clinton ended up with only a 0.2% popular vote advantage and suffering a devastating 232 to 306 loss.

That statement is simply false. Clinton captured 2.1% MORE of the popular vote than Trump did. You are engaging in giving us articles that contain falsehoods and thus destroying the credibility of both the article and the presenter.


At no point before the election did the state poll averages show Trump winning the necessary 270 electoral votes.

No mathematical evidence was presented to support this wild claim.
 
Last edited:
This is you again trying to put me as the issue. Simply provide the methodology from national posters showing where used state polls to make their predictions.

Its been almost a week now and you still are coming up empty.

This is from your linked article



That statement is simply false. Clinton captured 2.1% MORE of the popular vote than Trump did. You are engaging in giving us articles that contain falsehoods and thus destroying the credibility of both the article and the presenter.




No mathematical evidence was presented to support this wild claim.

Simply admit that you misstated what I said, then we can move on and have a discussion.
 
Back
Top Bottom