• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:3596] Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage

danielpalos said:
i resort to the fewest fallacies and must resort to more "gospel Truth" than You; if we need the "moral high ground" to make a moral decision.
Click to expand...

What "fallacies" have you resorted to using ?

What "gospel truths" have you used (if any) ?

The last part makes no grammatical sense.
 
Lisa said:
I used the ignore feature and blocked Daniel'.
Click to expand...

This is the best approach.
It's what's best for the overall health of the forum in general.

You are a wise Lisa, and I shall follow your lead on this.
 
Rich2018 said:
I wouldn't recommend that approach with a real drunk.
Click to expand...

Legally, that is what bartenders have to do. IF they don't, and the person gets into an accident, then the bartender is liable for any deaths that can occur and can be sued.
 
danielpalos said:
what if the person says, i gainsay your contention, want to argue about it; and happen to win their argument?
Click to expand...

They get arrested. .. because the bartender has the legal obligation to do so. The Law is on the side of the bartender when it comes to cutting someone off.
 
RAMOSS said:
Legally, that is what bartenders have to do. IF they don't, and the person gets into an accident, then the bartender is liable for any deaths that can occur and can be sued.
Click to expand...

I know but telling a drunk that he's drunk is not a good way forward.
 
Rich2018 said:
I know but telling a drunk that he's drunk is not a good way forward.
Click to expand...

Perhaps, but how cutting someone off from drinking more is up to the bartender. After all, HE would be legally responsible if he didnt'.
 
RAMOSS said:
Perhaps, but how cutting someone off from drinking more is up to the bartender. After all, HE would be legally responsible if he didnt'.
Click to expand...

He is, that's why the bar owner is well advised to invest in psychology training for bar staff involving how to de-escalate conflict, and failing that the employment of security staff.



And you just reminded me of a joke.
(said to a drunk)
Bouncer #1, You'd better leave now, otherwise you and I are going to have a conflict, and I don't like conflicts
Bouncer #2, I don't like ANY kind of breakfast cereal.
 
Public accommodation is simply that; it is unlawful to refuse to serve homosexuals in public accommodation. Bartenders get it. Why don't pastry chefs?
 
Rich2018 said:
Read post #195 and find out

A Parchment Barrier Needs Enforcement
Click to expand...

lol. You have to explain it. What does it mean? And what specific questions do you have concerning the general authority of our general welfare clause?

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Click to expand...

Your post is irrelevant and an appeal to ignorance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom