• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:3596] Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage

no they deserve to go to hell if they want to stop other people from being able to freely associate based on race


glad i could clear up why those people are assholes who can go to hell

But nobody was talking about "stopping other people from being able to associate based race", though. I was merely commenting that most white people seem to only want to associate with their own.
 
ty but tis a bit to much tone down the comedy please

I will try but might fail because I am mightily hilarious.
 
Recombination of recessive genes only works in a closed gene pool. We don't have that. We have an open gene pool.

oh like if the recessive gene in in a gene pool where it will never encounter the same kind of gene again unless its between descendents? i could see it being lost like that if it was only one blond and everyone else didn't have that gene then theres a chance it would never get passed down and so could never recombine with itself


but if all the blonds are still in that pool those genes wont be lost unless there's massive selective pressure against them





so surly you jest
 
But nobody was talking about "stopping other people from being able to associate based race", though. I was merely commenting that most white people seem to only want to associate with their own.

Who says? That's a broad and yet limited brush to apply to "white people" and not remotely flattering. As such, I'd want to see some significant factual support for it. Do you have anything like that? Or just your personal opinion for yourself and your friends/family?
 
oh like if the recessive gene in in a gene pool where it will never encounter the same kind of gene again unless its between descendents? i could see it being lost like that if it was only one blond and everyone else didn't have that gene then theres a chance it would never get passed down and so could never recombine with itself


but if all the blonds are still in that pool those genes wont be lost unless there's massive selective pressure against them


so surly you jest

Blond looks can disappear despite blond genes still persisting. Selective pressure against blond genes is one way to cause the disappearance of blond looks, but not the only way.
 
I was lamenting about anti-miscegenation laws being unconstitutional, but I never said I wanted to stop people from associating based on race.

that appears to be the same exact thing

so more comedy from you?
 
that appears to be the same exact thing
I am sorry to hear that you are unable to distinguish the two. Is English your first language?
so more comedy from you?

Ironic that this came from you.
 
Blond looks can disappear despite blond genes still persisting. Selective pressure against blond genes is one way to cause the disappearance of blond looks, but not the only way.

until 2 sets of genes that give blondness hook up like in the case of my brother born to 2 parents who did not have blond hair

still not seeing how mixing races or blonds and brunets is a threat to blondness

or how receive genes are under any threat when allowed to reproduce without restrictions

so why your comedy?
 
1.)Thats not what we are discussing. Ill wait here while you bat your strawman about.

2.) These are facts. Notice you havent yet refuted them.

3.) Gays have always had equal rights. No law ever treated gays and straits unequally. I cant think of ANY law that even mentions a persons sexual orientation.

1.) fail 1 the only straw-man is thinking biology matters . . it doesnt
2.) fail 2 they are NOT faxt they are your retarded feelings that dont matter theres nothing to refute just to laugh at and mock hence why your posts keep failing
3.) fail 3 no they havent hence the 100s of court cases that disagree with your . . again . . . FEELINGS . . . ooooooops you lose again LMAO
 
I am sorry to hear that you are unable to distinguish the two. Is English your first language?


Ironic that this came from you.

its ok as they are the same thing


yes english is my 1st and last language


you dont seem to grasp irony but you keep sticking to the absurd and you nail that every time
 
until 2 sets of genes that give blondness hook up like in the case of my brother born to 2 parents who did not have blond hair

still not seeing how mixing races or blonds and brunets is a threat to blondness

or how receive genes are under any threat when allowed to reproduce without restrictions
I am actually not quite sure what you are trying to say. I already explained that recessive genes recombining happens to a high enough degree (so as to produce the look) only in a closed gene pool. In an open gene pool, where there are more, ever more black-haired people and their genes, it will serve to essentially "dilute" the blond genes so much, that they rarely, if at all, recombine.

so why your comedy?
Well, like I said, I am hilarious.
 
its ok as they are the same thing

Sorry, but no. They are not the same.

Try to brush up on your English. I am not even saying this to insult you, I really think you need to improve your comprehension skills.
 
I am actually not quite sure what you are trying to say. I already explained that recessive genes recombining happens to a high enough degree (so as to produce the look) only in a closed gene pool. In an open gene pool, where there are more, ever more black-haired people and their genes, it will serve to essentially "dilute" the blond genes so much, that they rarely, if at all, recombine.


Well, like I said, I am hilarious.

you claimed that but it still seems to be poorly thought out bull**** so im assuming your still joking

but if you wanna pull up some sources on biology that support you ill give it a look and see if im wrong
 
Sorry, but no. They are not the same.

Try to brush up on your English. I am not even saying this to insult you, I really think you need to improve your comprehension skills.

haha you say that but not how they are different


you say you think i can't comprehend the language when you make posts that make it seem like you don't

more comedy
 
you claimed that but it still seems to be poorly thought out bull**** so im assuming your still joking
No, I am not joking.
but if you wanna pull up some sources on biology that support you ill give it a look and see if im wrong
It is a concept that I came up with by myself, so you probably wont find anything in the scientific literature. But it just makes sense to me. Keep injecting huge amounts of black-haired genes into a gene pool and eventually the blond/recessive genes won't recombine, because they have all been paired up with the dominant black-haired genes.

You are also free to relay my concept to a biology professor and let him see if there is any validity to it.
 
haha you say that but not how they are different


you say you think i can't comprehend the language when you make posts that make it seem like you don't

more comedy

The only way I can be accused of "stopping people from associating based on race", is if I actually said it. So unless you can quote me as to have uttered these words, you don't have a case. At most you are just reading your own interpretation into what I said.
 
No, I am not joking.
It is a concept that I came up with by myself, so you probably wont find anything in the scientific literature. But it just makes sense to me. Keep injecting huge amounts of black-haired genes into a gene pool and eventually the blond/recessive genes won't recombine, because they have all been paired up with the dominant black-haired genes.

You are also free to relay my concept to a biology professor and let him see if there is any validity to it.



you know that dna splits in the production sperm and egg right that the recessive genes are not altered by being paired with dominant ones ther just not expressed and are only expressed if they combine with a sperm or egg cell that also has that receive trait

like i have an x chromosome i got from my mother yet im a man because its paired up with a y chromosome i got from my dad instead of his x chromosome which would have made me female like in the case of my little sister

the x chromosome is not altered by being paired up with a y in men and i could theoretically pass it along just fine to a daughter
 
Some feel that anti-miscegenation laws were a good thing. I am one of them. It's too bad they were unconstitutional.

yes you clearly don't want people of different races being able to freely associate hear
 
you know that dna splits in the production sperm and egg right that the recessive genes are not altered by being paired with dominant ones ther just not expressed and are only expressed if they combine with a sperm or egg cell that also has that receive trait

like i have an x chromosome i got from my mother yet im a man because its paired up with a y chromosome i got from my dad instead of his x chromosome which would have made me female like in the case of my little sister

the x chromosome is not altered by being paired up with a y in men and i could theoretically pass it along just fine to a daughter

I don't dispute any of this, but it has nothing to do with what I said. I am not talking on the level of DNA and how they split and combine. I am talking on the level of gene pool.
 
yes you clearly don't want people of different races being able to freely associate hear

It has nothing to do with what I want to do. You accused me of stopping people from associating based on race, and I am calling on you to back up your accusation by quoting me. So far, you have not done that.
 
The only way I can be accused of "stopping people from associating based on race", is if I actually said it. So unless you can quote me as to have uttered these words, you don't have a case. At most you are just reading your own interpretation into what I said.

note how i was talking about people who want to stop free association

i never said you acted to fulfill that desire

Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage
 
I don't dispute any of this, but it has nothing to do with what I said. I am not talking on the level of DNA and how they split and combine. I am talking on the level of gene pool.

ok so if all the blonds and not blonds are allowed to reproduce freely genes for blond hair will never reach each other or will somehow be altered why?

you know that each child born from 1 blond parent still has a 50 /50 chance of passing the genes for that along to each child they have right and that even the non blond children who carry that trait have the same chance right?
 
Back
Top Bottom