[W:3596] Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage

[Lursa]

Youve not presented ANYTHING that showed the proportion of gay vs straight couples and instead only presented statistics on gay couples. At least I point to statistics that do make that comparison.

You provided a statement with zero info/sources to back it up. :doh You could have made it up for all we know. And if you need more assistance when I write that 10% of Americans are gay and cant work on a decent estimate...that's your limitation, not mine. I'll wait until I see if you have anything to dispute it at all first.

 

[Lursa]

I cannot answer your question because I am not "triggered" by anything or anybody. Please try to come up with a question that is less loaded, thanks.

You compared them to necrophiliacs...so, that's pretty extreme(ly wrong).

 

[Tanngrisnir]

I cannot answer your question because I am not "triggered" by anything or anybody. Please try to come up with a question that is less loaded, thanks.

Yawn. Yet another laughably dishonest assertion.

 

[Wan]

Yawn. Yet another laughably dishonest assertion.

Why did you ask me a loaded question like that? Is it because you went into this thread already thinking I am your enemy?

 

[CLAX1911]

Well then Id ask them to grow thicker skin. And don't find offence where there is none.

Comparing people to pedophiles is interesting offense.

Beg to differ.

Feel free.

Funny you should say that, because I feel that for you to think my comparison is disparaging, YOU are the one being "completely unreasonable".

So you think pedophiles are something to be revered interesting take but I don't agree with it.

I'd argue that I do.

when I stated the definition of the word instead of the word itself you argued that you didn't mean the definition of the word, but you meant the word.

You can argue that you do but you demonstrated that you didn't.

You find this difficult because in your circle, which I imagine is full of gays, being gay is acceptable. But to most normal people, it's not.

I doubt this claim. Feel free to prove it.

And it's not even about whether it's a "perversion" or not, anymore. Most normal people are put off by gays. I am sorry that you have to contend with this, but it is the truth.

I think people in your circles are normal.

That's good. I really don't want to irritate you further.

Nope. I am not being uncivil. Just because I said something you don't like or made a comparison that offended your sensibilities, it does not mean I am being uncivil.

I get that you think pedophiles are to be revered. Most normal people don't.

Not really. But you think you are being witty, though.


This might disappoint you, but I don't consider these things, "bigotry" or "prejudice"..etc to be meaningful terms.

That's called being obstinate. A Hallmark of bigotry and prejudice.

They are mostly liberal-speak cooked up by liberals to control what people can or cannot say.

people must accuse you of that a lot.

You had "laughs"? Lol. I don't think so.

Well the part where you said you didn't mean the definition of perversion you meant perversion was pretty funny.

 

[Wan]

I dont care that you think I am a "bigot" or "prejudiced". These terms mean nothing to me and they hold no power over me.

 

[AGENT J]

I dont care that you think I am a "bigot" or "prejudiced". These terms mean nothing to me and they hold no power over me.

Who said they hold power over YOU or mean anything to YOU? LMAO

multiple posters are just using facts and definitions and pointing out your dishonest, topically uneducated and bigoted views :shrug:

Facts dont need you to care or to have power over you they are facts none the less and its AWESOME that multiple posters, left, right ,center religions and non accurately identify your views as such and mock them

 

[bomberfox]

Well, I beg to differ. Comparing gays to necrophiliacs is not disparaging to me. If it appears that way to you, then it's your business. As far as I am concerned, I did not insult gays.


It does. Homosexuality is a form of sexual perversion just like necrophilia is. And I don't care if you disagree or are offended by it.


I do indeed compare gays to necrophiliacs. And I won't stop doing this just because you don't like it.

I think I do, you just disagree with me. And I think that in all likelihood, I am right while you are wrong. Outside of gay circles and their liberal-enablers, most people regard homosexuality as a form of sexual perversion. Or if not that, then definitely something that puts people off. And don't shoot the messenger. It is not my fault that normal people don't like gays.


I don't want to say anything more because I don't want to irritate you further. I see that you feel very strongly about this topic.

Whether you have the guts to admit you are desparaging homosexuals or not is not relevant.

 

[bomberfox]

I dont care that you think I am a "bigot" or "prejudiced". These terms mean nothing to me and they hold no power over me.

you would not be spinning so hard to escape such accusations of disparaging people if you did not care.

 

[Wan]

you would not be spinning so hard to escape such accusations of disparaging people if you did not care.

Yes, I do care. I care very deeply. There. You won the internets. Are you happy now?

 

[CLAX1911]

I dont care that you think I am a "bigot" or "prejudiced". These terms mean nothing to me and they hold no power over me.

The idea behind identifying bigotry is not to get bigoted people not to be, it's about confirmation bias. Such people are used as an example to others of what not to be.

 

[Wan]

The idea behind identifying bigotry is not to get bigoted people not to be, it's about confirmation bias. Such people are used as an example to others of what not to be.

Yeah, telling other people what the "proper" way to act and think is. You don't find it a bit totalitarian?

 

[CLAX1911]

you would not be spinning so hard to escape such accusations of disparaging people if you did not care.

I think what she's saying is that she doesn't think she is Prejudiced.

 

[Wan]

I think what she's saying is that she doesn't think she is Prejudiced.

I am not sure if I am "prejudiced" or not, but I know that words like "bigotry", "discrimination", "racism", "prejudiced" ..etc etc are just stuff invented by liberals to control other people's thoughts and actions.

 

[AGENT J]

Yes, I do care. I care very deeply. There. You won the internets. Are you happy now?

Actually all of DP won because your posts lost the moment they first started since AGAIN most people left right center religious and non mocked them for the dishonest, topically uneducated and bigoted views they were. This is a great thing

 

[ecofarm]

I am not sure if I am "prejudiced" or not, but I know that words like "bigotry", "discrimination", "racism", "prejudiced" ..etc etc are just stuff invented by liberals to control other people's thoughts and actions.

Calling shenanigans.

 

[CLAX1911]

Yeah, telling other people what the "proper" way to act and think is. You don't find it a bit totalitarian?

Not really telling, it's using logic to debate you so that people will see your position is unreasonable.

 

[CLAX1911]

I am not sure if I am "prejudiced" or not, but I know that words like "bigotry", "discrimination", "racism", "prejudiced" ..etc etc are just stuff invented by liberals to control other people's thoughts and actions.

No they're invented to describe concepts. The idea that words are invented by political adversaries is a conspiracy theory. They may be used to that way and a lot of the times they are. But just because that happens a lot of the time doesn't mean that it happens all of the time.

 

[Wan]

Not really telling, it's using logic to debate you so that people will see your position is unreasonable.

I am sorry, but you said, "show others an example of what not to be". That is essentially saying you get to tell others how to think and act "properly".

 

[AGENT J]

I am sorry, but you said, "show others an example of what not to be". That is essentially saying you get to tell others how to think and act "properly".

Again stick to your country and your language whatever that is because that is NOT "essentially saying" anybody "GETS" to tell others how to think and act
LMAO

 

[CLAX1911]

I am sorry, but you said, "show others an example of what not to be".

by which I meant intellectually defective. if I show you to be intellectually defective to other people not to yourself they will be less likely to follow your moronic ideas.

That is essentially saying you get to tell others how to think and act "properly".

how so?

If I get you to say The illogical and moronic things because of your illogical and moronic believe and people listen to me how am I telling them anything?

 

[Wan]

by which I meant intellectually defective. if I show you to be intellectually defective to other people not to yourself they will be less likely to follow your moronic ideas.

how so?

If I get you to say The illogical and moronic things because of your illogical and moronic believe and people listen to me how am I telling them anything?

I don't particularly care to "prove" to you that you are trying to tell other people how to think and act. If you truly dont see it, or you see it but just deny it, there is nothing I can do about it.

But I suspect that deep down you know what you said borders on totalitarianism.

 

[CLAX1911]

I don't particularly care to "prove" to you that you are trying to tell other people how to think and act.

that's because you can't and that's because I'm not.

If you truly dont see it, or you see it but just deny it, there is nothing I can do about it.

I can't see things you fabricate and imagine.

But I suspect that deep down you know what you said borders on totalitarianism.

no it's actually how we progressed out of the dark ages.

 

[Wan]

Ok then. You have won. Now I am going to take a break. See you at some other thread that's more trending and exciting.

 

[AGENT J]

Ok then. You have won. Now I am going to take a break. See you at some other thread that's more trending and exciting.

Good luck, in the future simply dont make posts that are full of retarded lies and they will have better success. Otherwise the result is going to be the same, people left right and center mocking them lies and destroying them with facts. Thats free advice, you're welcome!