- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 104,282
- Reaction score
- 94,957
- Location
- Third Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
@ them, Chomsky.My hope is Mika-El & Centrist may find their way down here . . . (not to over-look many others) . . .
I am totally with you on your assessments.
I am beginning to wonder how much of this "special military operation" was all Putin's conception, aided by maybe a small staff of officers. Dictators easily get carried away by what they believe is their brilliance. Putin's seizure of Crimea in 2014 was one for the books; and he got much kudos from the Russian population; it is easy to see how the man may have gotten carried away and began to see himself as some military genius. Why not replicate the Crimea coup de main of 2014 on a grand scale? The Ukrainian bull went for Putin's cape in 2014, maybe the Ukrainian bull will be accomodating one more time and deliver the Dictator a successful "special military operation".
The "special military operation" has been strange as far as military operations go. For example, a day or two ago there was reports of Russia hitting fuel dumps in Lviv. You kind of say hmmmm. A full month after start of hostilities! Why was it not hit in the opening days of the campaign? Isnt that exactly what the General Staff of the Russian Army would have had high on their list of initial targets to be hit? And examples of this abound. Where targets you expect to be hit in the first day are hit weeks after; as if someone is realising belatedly that the Ukrainian bull is tougher than the chief expected.
But Putin faces a serious danger. Time is not on his side. The weapons various Nato countries are scraping up and sending to Ukraine will soon start making their effects felt. A war of attrition boils down to who can manage to get more men and materiel to the line of scrimage. The west definitely can get more materiel to the line of scrimage than Russia can. It may not be enough for Putin to just hope to prevail in Donbass and south. If he cannot take Ukraine out then, with time, the support of the west will wear Russia down.
Russian military assets removed from Kiev will need a lot of repairs, let alone the soldiers, who are suffering from low morale
NATO/Western Govts want the Russian military to bleed & die for their country
This war will be ongoing, as Zelenskyy will accept is a return to prewar borders.
You're not the only one seeing possible analogy to '89-'91.
Any peace deal will include the lifting of most sanctions.I actually believe Putin will bankrupt Russia and be removed from power just like in 1991.
It's pretty clear he is unable to fix his military issues, and simple bombing campaigns won't be enough once Ukraine begins
getting even more gear from allies.
Ukraine is now launching offense over the Russian border.
Ukraine will need guarantees. We will see what they areI'll disagree on the point of NATO making any guarantees that would be even remotely similar to its article 5., on any peace deal.
When (not IF) Russia goes for Ukraine again, it would involve NATO in a direct war with Russia, just as much as if Ukraine were a NATO member.
I believe he was already well on his way to doing that (even where it would have taken some more years) BEFORE he engaged on thus insane war adventure.I actually believe Putin will bankrupt Russia and be removed from power just like in 1991.
It's pretty clear he is unable to fix his military issues, and simple bombing campaigns won't be enough once Ukraine begins
getting even more gear from allies.
Ukraine is now launching offense over the Russian border.
You too???
Oh well, the future awaits!![]()
agreeIf Putin wants to fight a war of attrition against the West, he's gonna' be a hurtin'!
That'll be interesting indeed. If they're anything like the previous ones........................Ukraine will need guarantees. We will see what they are
fast track would certainly provide a novelty.Finland's President told Parliament to draft the request to join NATO.
That will be fast tracked thru NATO
Good idea making this thread! We were certainly missing a lot of voices in the old thread.Had a great thread upstairs, consolidated, great thread. But it appears a number cannot make an appearance for a variety of reasons
I think it may turn out a lot more violent than that one, sorry.
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but Pooty's
under the impression he can fool all of the people all of the time, and the rest of the world knows that's
simply not true.
Fuel and military depots were hit in the early days of the war, but it wasn't a comprehensive wipe out because they didn't believe that it would turn into a prolonged conflict. But now that the fuel supplies are being hit, Ukraine will find it much harder to resupply, especially in the East.I am totally with you on your assessments. I am beginning to wonder how much of this "special military operation" was all Putin's conception, aided by maybe a small staff of officers. Dictators easily get carried away by what they believe is their brilliance. Putin's seizure of Crimea in 2014 was one for the books; and he got much kudos from the Russian population; it is easy to see how the man may have gotten carried away and began to see himself as some military genius. Why not replicate the Crimea coup de main of 2014 on a grand scale? The Ukrainian bull went for Putin's cape in 2014, maybe the Ukrainian bull will be accomodating one more time and deliver the Dictator a successful "special military operation".
The "special military operation" has been strange as far as military operations go. For example, a day or two ago there was reports of Russia hitting fuel dumps in Lviv. You kind of say hmmmm. A full month after start of hostilities! Why was it not hit in the opening days of the campaign? Isnt that exactly what the General Staff of the Russian Army would have had high on their list of initial targets to be hit? And examples of this abound. Where targets you expect to be hit in the first day are hit weeks after; as if someone is realising belatedly that the Ukrainian bull is tougher than the chief expected.
I would expect to see a gradual surround of the Donbass cauldron in the next few weeks, then a focus towards annexing the territories east of the Dnieper. Control of the South, East, and maybe Odessa to make Ukraine landlocked would the very least that the Kremlin will work to achieve. Which is why you've seen Kyiv become more open to concessions.But Putin faces a serious danger. Time is not on his side. The weapons various Nato countries are scraping up and sending to Ukraine will soon start making their effects felt. A war of attrition boils down to who can manage to get more men and materiel to the line of scrimage. The west definitely can get more materiel to the line of scrimage than Russia can. It may not be enough for Putin to just hope to prevail in Donbass and south. If he cannot take Ukraine out then, with time, the support of the west will wear Russia down.
Yep. Stepped on a mine and didn't even know it.
The NATO Generals - Political leaders want to force a Russian compromise on prewar borders.Bleed & die could be interpreted as the west wanting a long, protracted war. Which I am confident is not the case.
![]()
Well it cam from a guy, so no credit for me.Good idea making this thread! We were certainly missing a lot of voices in the old thread.
Calling Russia something akin to Nigeria with snow (aka a giant petrol station run by the Mafia) might be overdoing it
The NATO Generals - Political leaders want to force a Russian compromise on prewar borders.
Inflicting massive damage on the Russian Military is a fact.
More KIA/WIA/destroyed kit, the better. Watching a well trained military destroy itself on the world stage is from what I would guess, a strategic goal
Putin has lost this war. If the west lets Russia control a land bridge to Crimea, they are delaying the day till another invasion.
This war will go on till Putin wants to end it
Putin will try to sell it as a win but many Russians with this SM world will learn more of the truth.
How long it takes for facts to travel thru Russian society, no idea on that. Yet to be seen. But Internet, SM, Russia cannot close it all down as China can. Coming 6-12 months in Russia will be interesting
Then consider all the KIA/WIA and the morale in the Russian military just took a major cliff dive.
The ramifications of the war will reverberate for decades. Unless Russia heads towards Democracy, their economy is severely ****ed
True the last ones were useless.That'll be interesting indeed. If they're anything like the previous ones........................
fast track would certainly provide a novelty.
So, you got fracked?![]()
Any peace deal will include the lifting of most sanctions.
The long term effects on the Russian economy have yet to be felt.
Putin can only do so much with the economy
Russians have a very clear memory of the deaths/injured from Afghanistan war
NATO/Western countries want to bleed the Russians in Ukraine
That said, western investment in Russia is toast. Chinese perhaps, who knows but western investment does not want Putin's stink on their brands
EU will build LNG plants, reducing imports from Russia, oil will also be replaced. Some of this will take many years. Building an LNG facility takes years.
But energy from green to nuke is being built and will expand across the EU
Who knows if Russia will have an October surprise?