• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:212,493] Another MAGA hat attack, this time 4 arrested

apdst said:
There's no need: you keep saying it.
Click to expand...

What is stupid is saying you will knock the woman out for not even attacking you (in the case of this story at least).

And yes, you are misrepresenting what I stated.
 
haymarket said:
You conveniently forget the inspiration for the madness in the first place. Or maybe I do not understand what MAGA hat is ?
Click to expand...

Nope...I didn't forget anything.
 
Fishking said:
Lol...emojis are really supporting your reasoned response.
Click to expand...

Hey, let an old guy who just discovered these things on his phone to have a little fun! :shock::peace:kissass
 
Peter King said:
What is stupid is saying you will knock the woman out for not even attacking you (in the case of this story at least).

And yes, you are misrepresenting what I stated.
Click to expand...

That's not stupid. That's self-defense.

Here, in The United States, we have the right to defend ourselves from assault.
 
haymarket said:
You were the one who bragged about doing it. All I did was make the observation after your expressed desire.
Click to expand...

I never said anything about wiping anyone's ass. :lamo
 
apdst said:
That's not stupid. That's self-defense.

Here, in The United States, we have the right to defend ourselves from assault.
Click to expand...

No, that is stupid, taking a hat of your head is not an assault in the mind of any realistic human (male or female).
 
Peter King said:
No, that is stupid, taking a hat of your head is not an assault in the mind of any realistic human (male or female).
Click to expand...

In this country, it's assault and it's a crime.

You're applying a different standard because she's a girl.
 
haymarket said:
You conveniently forget the inspiration for the madness in the first place. Or maybe I do not understand what MAGA hat is ?
Click to expand...

Isn't it the hat for the Misogynistic Absurdist Grouches Association
 
apdst said:
In this country, it's assault and it's a crime.

You're applying a different standard because she's a girl.
Click to expand...

No, I am applying a different standard because I am not an insecure man who is terrified of big scary women who take a hat off my head. Which is not an assault and may be a crime but so far nobody was prosecuted for taking the hat of someone's head.
 
Peter King said:
No, I am applying a different standard because I am not an insecure man who is terrified of big scary women who take a hat off my head. Which is not an assault and may be a crime but so far nobody was prosecuted for taking the hat of someone's head.
Click to expand...

At least you admit to applying a double standard.
 
Peter King said:
No, I am applying a reasonable standard about what is a crime. And you are not.
Click to expand...

The law is the law. The girl doesn't get a free pass because you agree with her motives.
 
apdst said:
The law is the law. The girl doesn't get a free pass because you agree with her motives.
Click to expand...

I do not agree with her motives as I do not know what her motives were for taking the hat. But as she was not charged with any violent crime, your physical attack you stated you wanted to commit sounds totally not in comparison to her "crime".
 
Peter King said:
I do not agree with her motives as I do not know what her motives were for taking the hat. But as she was not charged with any violent crime, your physical attack you stated you wanted to commit sounds totally not in comparison to her "crime".
Click to expand...

You absolutely agree with her motives, even if you claim to disagree with her actions.
 
SheWolf said:
Where did I say I want to violate your rights. Nowhere
Click to expand...

By the fact that you are responding in a thread about a trump supporter's rights that have been violated then saying you don't care about Trump supporters.

But don't worry about it, just go back to caring only about yourself and the problems you have (you know, as you claim about trump supporters), and not of the rest of society.
 
apdst said:
You absolutely agree with her motives, even if you claim to disagree with her actions.
Click to expand...

Nobody knows her exact motives so you nor I can agree with them, even if you deceive yourself that you "know" what it is, because all we can do is make assumptions about her exact motives.

But that is besides the point, this was not an attack, this was not a case of self defense that justifies knocking a woman out (almost no reason for knocking out a woman exists IMHO).
 
buck said:
By the fact that you are responding in a thread about a trump supporter's rights that have been violated then saying you don't care about Trump supporters.
Click to expand...

Having zero tolerance for someone does not mean you don't care about Trump supporters. And only one extreme right maga hat wearer had his hat taken from his head, not too much violating of rights went on there.

She also did not say she "does not care about Trump supporters" she said she does not care about their feelings and it was in connection to the things she wrote in her post, not about the hat taking incident. Which was a big case of:

139735-140265.webp
 
SheWolf said:
I am tired of the games you Trump supporters claim. Trump's policies are different, far worse, and far reaching than Obama's. I did not support a lot of things Obama did to people on the boarder.
Click to expand...

No need to go off so on a simple question, yes or no would have sufficed.
 
Peter King said:
Nobody knows her exact motives so you nor I can agree with them, even if you deceive yourself that you "know" what it is, because all we can do is make assumptions about her exact motives.

But that is besides the point, this was not an attack, this was not a case of self defense that justifies knocking a woman out (almost no reason for knocking out a woman exists IMHO).
Click to expand...

You knew her motives in this post. You even agreed that she used violence.

Peter King said:
Good, violence is never acceptable even when someone is trying to provoke with the wearing of an item of clothing that can and has provoked angry responses. Walking around a very liberal place with that hat will provoke and people should laugh at people who do that but never ever ever physically assault them.

Here are some observations, nobody said leftist are tolerant against intolerance. Wearing the hat of a known Mexican insulting/immigrants harassing/Muslim banning idiot is seen by many tolerant people as a sign of an intolerant person. But as stated above, never a justification for violence.

But this is another example of "rightists" ridiculous hypocrisy towards "leftists". Don't misunderstand me, leftists have hypocrisy too.

But this is the issue, you are complaining about the damned leftists but sadly when the "leftist" complain about the treatment of journalists and protesters at Trump rallies who are wearing something "rightists" disapprove of, the Orange Oaf even encourages violence or non-violent but aggressive attitudes to protesters/newsmedia/journalists.

If find the unhinged anger, the disrespect towards other people, police too and the arrogant self righteousness of Trump supporters to protesters and media equally worrisome and troublesome but unlike the left politicians who abhor (most of them at least) this kind of violence, the right wing Trump supporters are being actively egged on by their Orange Master which is much more troublesome. And also worrisome is the total lack of disgust among Trump supporters of the actions of their own. The problem now is that their leader now is in charge and he does not care nor do his supporters.
Click to expand...
 
apdst said:
You knew her motives in this post. You even agreed that she used violence.
Click to expand...

well, that was before I investigated the facts of the matter and then the whole story kinda changed now didn't it. We were no longer talking about 4 people being arrested for an attack on a maga agitator but we were talking about one woman who took the hat of a maga person. Which kinda changed the story a whole heap.
 
Peter King said:
well, that was before I investigated the facts of the matter and then the whole story kinda changed now didn't it. We were no longer talking about 4 people being arrested for an attack on a maga agitator but we were talking about one woman who took the hat of a maga person. Which kinda changed the story a whole heap.
Click to expand...

That was before you were challenged and you had to crawfish your way out...lol

MAGA agitator? See? There you go justifying the violence.
 
apdst said:
That was before you were challenged and you had to crawfish your way out...lol

MAGA agitator? See? There you go justifying the violence.
Click to expand...

That had nothing to do with being challenged, that was because I was stupid enough to trust the OP, mistake understood and corrected.

And yes, maga agitator. If you are a supporter of Texas Nomads SAR you are an agitator.
 
Grim17 said:
Tolerant leftists attacking people because they're wearing a MAGA hat has become all too familiar these days, especially on college campuses. This time it took place at Texas State University and unlike other campuses where police turn a blind eye to these type attacks, police immediately took action.

I find the unhinged anger, the disrespect toward police, and the arrogant self righteousness of those horrible girls very troubling, because these are the people who will one day be in charge of this country and nobody seems to give a damn.


Click to expand...


It's Antifa. Good, glad they got arrested.
Now, do you want to reconsider labeling those participants as "tolerant leftists" when in reality they're members of Antifa and sympathizers?
 
buck said:
By the fact that you are responding in a thread about a trump supporter's rights that have been violated then saying you don't care about Trump supporters.

But don't worry about it, just go back to caring only about yourself and the problems you have (you know, as you claim about trump supporters), and not of the rest of society.
Click to expand...

I don't support violence so again, I never took a position against anybody's rights in this thread.
 
Peter King said:
That had nothing to do with being challenged, that was because I was stupid enough to trust the OP, mistake understood and corrected.

And yes, maga agitator. If you are a supporter of Texas Nomads SAR you are an agitator.
Click to expand...

There you go again; justifying violence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom