The President didn't say 'piles of bald eagles' but that a lot of them are being killed which is true.
. . .The guest commentary by Noreen Walsh highlighting the conflict between wind farms and both bald and golden eagles pointedly fails to mention the number of such birds killed annually by collisions with the blades. While the Interior Department refuses to release the actual number, most estimates by both industry and environmental groups put the number of those deaths at between 300 and 500 per year. . .
The facts about how many eagles are killed by wind turbines
Nobody can accuse the Denver Post of being a right wing partisan publication.
Maybe it isn't an alarming rate because birds find all sorts of ways to kill themselves on human erected structures, but that is quite a pile of birds just the same.
It isn't pretty. Google photos of bald eagles killed by wind turbines and you will see that it does happen. And despite President Trump's statement re bald eagles, the billions in subsidies to renewable energy continue even now. On our trip to Arkansas two weeks ago we saw two new large wind farms going up near I-40. I don't think danger to birds is a primary factor in a national discussion on whether we are getting our money's worth in those massive subsidies mostly from the federal government but also from some state governments.
I read recently that Germany's wind turbines are becoming unprofitable after 20 years of use and we are increasingly seeing the waste and blight as wind farms go off line. I think it is not unreasonable to evaluate whether we actually help the planet considering the enormous expense and huge carbon footprint to build and install a wind turbine. If it is profitable both for the environment and economically over the long haul, I sure wish somebody could provide me with believable, non partisan/greed/politically motivated information that would convince me.
I sure hate seeing scenes like this that are becoming more common all the time: