Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments
So if he had done it before or after her testimony it would have been ok? Or are you saying that these career bureaucrats are beyond reproach?
No. It's a fact he did it during her meeting, and astounding.
He said she has done a bad job. So what? Where is the intimidation? Hell, she wouldnt have even known about it if Schiff hadnt read it to her. So why arent you denouncing Schiff?
You don't appear to understand what witness intimidation is.
Fletch, witness intimidation is also intimidation of any/all potential future witnesses. Of which there appear to be no shortage of, thankfully.
Go after me, and I'll go after you...as POTUS, publicly, by attacking you.
I also do not believe you have thought much about what it really would be like to be attacked by right wing media on Fox, publicly, and attacked by a sitting President of the United States, as they try to cover up their corruption. It's not fun and games, you realize, it's their lives, their reputation, their job.
Look, I don't think Trump should have done it. I think he should let this play itself out and go about running the country, but that's not his style. But the liberal overreaction to this is silly
Fletch, we don't hear public officials doing this, because few prominent people are this stupid. Attorney's say it so often we all know the rules. You don't get involved in an investigation, you let your attorneys speak for you.
The minute you open your mouth against witnesses, the process, etc., you open yourself up to liability or damage to your case.
That you don't agree with Trump is irrelevant. That you support him regardless, is the issue.
