As usual and right on que, tax cuts are an expense and have to be paid for, wow, economics and accounting ignorance.
/QUOTE]
Well first Con... yet again.. your post has nothing to do with what I posted. Nothing. So.. lets try yet again:
So.. I just stated.., that when the government increases deficit spending.. that money goes into the economy.. and that increases the GDP.
That increase in GDP.. means that FIT revenue to the federal government will INCREASE... the raw data will show an increase in FIT revenue..
YET.. the deficit grew.. despite having more FIT revenue.
So you go ahead and tell me what what I said is WRONG. Show us your economic chops here conservative.
See.. i am not going to let you divert the conversation Conservative. You go ahead and point out exactly why .. what I said above is wrong.
Now to the rest:
Hmm.. well Con.. whenever you can provide ANY post where I stated explicitly that "tax cuts are an expense".. well then you might have something.. but of course.. I never have said that.
What I have said.. and whats true.. is that a tax cut can increase the deficit.. And therefore.. if you don't want to increase the debt and deficit.. a tax cut needs to pay for itself.
As usual, govt. is giving me SS and Medicare, wrong, I paid for Medicare and SS and was forced to do it.
Yeah.. most likely false for you.. and definitely false for your generation. Your generation did not "pay for your medicare and social security". Its running out of money because you didn;t put enough in.. and now.. my generation and my sons are going to get stuck footing your bills. You are welcome.
Another liberal ignorant statement, Reagan Federal Income Tax cuts actually cut Federal Income Tax revenue, FALSE, Reagan FIT cuts led to a 68% increase in FIT revenue
Well.. you can't make the statement that it increased the revenue.. because a growing economy would do that regardless of a tax cut.. so would increase government deficit spending.. both of those things would increase FIT revenue. As has been pointed out.
However, what you have been instructed in.. is that Reagans tax cuts deepened the deficit because it decreased the percentage of tax collected vs GDP. which is a valid statistic.. while raw FIT revenue is not. And I provided the statistics and the link to prove it.
Without the tax cuts in this recession consumers would have still increased the GDP over double and 17 million jobs would have been created, stunning ignorance of personal behavior and overly optimistic economic GDP growth predictions.
Well. not sure what you mean about "this recession". You mean Reagans.. or the one we just went through. During Reagans time.. yeah.. the economy would have come back to recession without the tax cuts because the recession was caused by an artificial increase in rates caused by the FED. When that changed.. the economy rebounded.
In the last recession.... it was caused by the bursting of the housing/mortgage bubble.. and the Bush and Obama tax cuts.. helped stabilize the economy and kept money flowing.. it can be credited for keeping the economy from deepening into a depression. And giving the economy time to recover. BUT the real reason for us getting out of recession is the economy recovering.. See... as a real conservative.. I understand that the economy is a lot bigger than the government or one president. You sir.. as a liberal. think that government action is the be all end all of the economy. That's why you think government action.. and big government is responsible for the economy.