• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W: 1134] Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I've busted your ass twice. Are you really coming back for more?

And not only married women are pro-life, the majority of ALL women in the US are pro-life.

Wow, doubling down on your BS.

Didnt see your sources. And you are wrong on both counts.

And you didnt bust my ass at all...you are compounding your sins of lying.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Does different terminology make it easier for you to call for the killing of these babies? Does it help you dehumanize them?

LMAO, thanks for proving my point! In spades! :lamo

He says he "knows science." I call BS because he apparently doesnt recognize the medical and biological names for the stages of humans, esp. those before birth.

Only the ignorant criticize people for using accurate terminology. And the willfully ignorant use their own definitions to attempt emotional manipulation when they have no real argument.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

He says he "knows science." I call BS because he apparently doesnt recognize the medical and biological names for the stages of humans, esp. those before birth.

Only the ignorant criticize people for using accurate terminology. And the willfully ignorant use their own definitions to attempt emotional manipulation when they have no real argument.

Definition of child (Entry 1 of 3)
1a: an unborn or recently born person

Definition of baby (Entry 1 of 3)
1a(1): an extremely young child


Ouch. Got your ass busted again.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Definition of child (Entry 1 of 3)
1a: an unborn or recently born person

Definition of baby (Entry 1 of 3)
1a(1): an extremely young child


Ouch. Got your ass busted again.

What's that source?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Wow, doubling down on your BS.

Didnt see your sources. And you are wrong on both counts.

And you didnt bust my ass at all...you are compounding your sins of lying.

"Pro-Choice" or "Pro-Life," 2018-2019 Demographic Tables


"Pro-choice" "Pro-life" No opinion^ Number of interviews

Men 48 46 6 529
Women 43 51 6 480

Ouch! Got your ass busted AGAIN and AGAIN.
Will you have the decency to apologize?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Hey guys. I don't think Lursa will be able to come back from that barrage. I doubt if she'll be able to sit for a couple of days, in fact. lol

Goodnight
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

"Pro-Choice" or "Pro-Life," 2018-2019 Demographic Tables


"Pro-choice" "Pro-life" No opinion^ Number of interviews

Men 48 46 6 529
Women 43 51 6 480

Ouch! Got your ass busted AGAIN and AGAIN.
Will you have the decency to apologize?

I'm not apologizing because there are other polls out there that show differently. It also says this:

For results based on the total samples of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.And yes, your poll shows what you said. It also clearly showed, but an even larger margin, that the better educated someone is, the much less likely they are to be pro-life.

So with that, it seems that only about half, if that many women in the US are pro-life.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Hey guys. I don't think Lursa will be able to come back from that barrage. I doubt if she'll be able to sit for a couple of days, in fact. lol

Goodnight

Pride is also a sin...as is lying. I think the Lord forgives delusions tho.

You have failed to make any headway here at all. Dont forget to use tongs when eating your soup for dinner! :lamo
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Source?

And up front, I call BS that that is not true.

Maybe there is no clear majority for abortion but that I have so far not found.

But even if it did exist, who gives a crap. Any adult women can have sex, no religious extremist has the right to determine who can and cannot have sex. Only people with delusions of grandeur problems think they have the right to decide such things (which includes right wing religious men and for example the catholic church and thank goodness women can now give right wing religious men and the church the middle finger and tell them to fudge off and not interfere in her business).
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I'm not apologizing because there are other polls out there that show differently. It also says this:



So with that, it seems that only about half, if that many women in the US are pro-life.

Very nice moving of the goal posts, as I predicted. No decency to apologize for saying my claims were BS and that I was lying. Leftwingers don't have decency.

But I do find it interesting I've been lectured all night about how I don't speak for women, and blah blah. Yet women by a large eight-point margin are pro-life. NOT pro-choice. Even more so than men. According to this most recent Gallup poll.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

It's funny. He refused to even tour UVa. He got one look at the leafy campus and the leftwing kids, and he got right back in the car. Didn't even go to the orientation. We tried to talk him into taking a look because we'd driven a couple of hours, but he wouldn't hear of it, so we left after about 20 minutes. In the end, my son proved to have excellent instincts. UVa has proven to be a leftwing sewer.

It was the same when he looked at Wake Forest. During the opening video, they had a clip of alum Maya Angelou spewing her leftwing hate. My son simply said "Let's go". And we left. No more than 45 minutes at the school.

Obviously these schools would deny him the great opportunity to participate in a Cemetery of the Innocents indoctrination session. They may have opened his mind a bit, but you are to be congratulated in going another generation of insulation from reality.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I would like to see a more Christian bent among the posters in this forum. I am working to make that happen. I want to reduce the amount of atheist influence here, just by my example, if nothing else.

Try becoming more Christ like. It would help
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Try becoming more Christ like. It would help

Jesus called out evil. I do the same.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I feel pretty certain I have based on the current actions of a few former atheists who seem to have cleaned up their posts, apparently based on my example and their conversations with me. I feel great about that.

Which posters?
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I keep telling you, I will not identify personal things about people. Nor will I name them. I told you what to do. Put the word out. If they PM me and give me permission, I will reveal their names.

ROFL....I'll bet my house you don't get any PMs.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I feel pretty certain I have based on the current actions of a few former atheists who seem to have cleaned up their posts, apparently based on my example and their conversations with me. I feel great about that.

I think it is more likely that you have turned people the other way....
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

Which posters?

Nah, I don't give out personal information like that.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I think it is more likely that you have turned people the other way....

There are those who don't want to be converted. They don't like it when I tell the truth. But in time, they too may come around.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

ROFL....I'll bet my house you don't get any PMs.

I don't need your mobile home.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

A newborn is a baby too, only less developed So is a fetus, only less developed still. Looks like the sole difference between a zef and an adult is level of development and NOTHING ELSE.

So, if somebody asked you to point to a three month old baby, which would you pick?

This

pregnancy-week-13-fingerprints_square.webp

or this

3months-IMG_0694_4x3.webp
 

Attachments

  • 10-week-old-fetus_12-week-pregnancy.webp
    10-week-old-fetus_12-week-pregnancy.webp
    10.5 KB · Views: 52
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

I don't need your mobile home.

lol, of course you don't. And you didn't get any PM's thanking you for conversions either.
 
Re: Students Shout Their Abortions to Disrupt A Pro-Life Display. Pathetic.

lol, of course you don't. And you didn't get any PM's thanking you for conversions either.

I won't reveal any personal conversations I've had. Thanks, though
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom