• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:109] If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos

Piglet said:
Charity isn't designed to eradicate poverty -- it's designed to offer help to those who need it most. And, in that respect, it's pretty successful.

What we know doesn't work are the handful of social welfare programs that lock people into a constant state of poverty.
Click to expand...

Government programs would work much better if they were simplified and expanded. There is too much red tape for needy people to get financial aid. Everything is too complicated. If people could just prove they are in poverty and unable to get living wage jobs (or work at all) to get government assistance a lot more would qualify. Also, the government restrictions are too low. When they say "low income" they mean "almost no money" so people who are paid minimum wage 20 hours a week don't qualify despite being under the poverty line. You have no idea how much more effective social welfare programs would be if conservatives were not preventing liberals from fixing these problems.
 
Luther said:
Don't tell anybody!

But once upon a time this white conservative married an illegal alien Mexican(Brown person)(LOL)
Click to expand...

That is rather interesting to know.
 
AlphaOmega said:
Thanks. Correct..."One's white". A designation based only on skin color.
Click to expand...

True, because skin color means nothing -- in short, they're both just "conservatives."
 
Phys251 said:
If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos





Once the baby is born, the "prolife" movement picks and chooses which babies' lives matters and which do not.

Immigrants fleeing hellish conditions for a chance at a new life? They don't matter.
Babies born into deep poverty? They don't matter.
Babies in abusive households? They don't matter.
LGBTQs? They don't matter. Especially Ts and Qs.

And so on, and so forth. Have you ever noticed how the people who claim to be devout supporters of the lives of babies are remarkably opposed to any kind of policy that would increase the survivability of babies once they leave the womb? Why this hypocrisy, anti-choicers?
Click to expand...

Because only white people are pro-life :roll:

The biggest race baiter on the forum making threads steeped in racial bias.
 
AlphaOmega said:
that awkward moment when lefties get caught making racist comments and become angry.
Click to expand...
:lamo

You keep doubling-down on your misplaced use of the word as a smokescreen against the fact that you have no way to refute anything I said.

If the OP is factually wrong, then it should be easy for you to disprove it. Now. Continuing your empty "racism" allegation without offering a sincere refutation of the OP will be proof that you have no way to refute it. :)
 
Fishking said:
Because only white people are pro-life :roll:

The biggest race baiter on the forum making threads steeped in racial bias.
Click to expand...

Straight to the ad homs I see. Not even trying to make a factual refutation to the facts I posted. :lol:
 
Scrabaholic said:
Exactly HOW is it racist?
Click to expand...

Far-right racists (neither you nor AlphaOmega) love to say that "it's not racist if it's true." So it's amusing to watch prolifers flail when they get the same treatment in reverse. :lol:
 
jamesrodom said:
"White" Conservatives? If there is any evidence that white pro-lifers believe differently than pro-life people of color, this article omits it.

But then among some progressives, it's become popular to refer to race even when race isn't at all part of the conversation. I can't keep track of the number of times I hear the term "white male privilege" regurgitated when the conversation is strictly about gender. It may as well be White Angle Saxon Protest Straight Male Privilege.

This is how conservatives get away with accusing progressives of "identity politics". They're not really using "identity" correctly, but the underlying point holds true.
Click to expand...
Another complete failure to actually address the OP. Next! :2wave:
 
Phys251 said:
:lamo

You keep doubling-down on your misplaced use of the word as a smokescreen against the fact that you have no way to refute anything I said.

If the OP is factually wrong, then it should be easy for you to disprove it. Now. Continuing your empty "racism" allegation without offering a sincere refutation of the OP will be proof that you have no way to refute it. :)
Click to expand...

I asked what the difference was between a white conservative and a conservative. What is your answer?
 
AlphaOmega said:
I asked what the difference was between a white conservative and a conservative. What is your answer?
Click to expand...

There it is, more evidence that you have no way to refute the OP. :laughat:

You have repeatedly failed to falsify the OP and are instead asking stupid questions such as the one above as a diversionary tactic. :)

If the OP is so bad, then why can't you falsify it? What exactly is holding you back? The facts, maybe? ;)
 
Phys251 said:
There it is, more evidence that you have no way to refute the OP. :laughat:

You have repeatedly failed to falsify the OP and are instead asking stupid questions such as the one above as a diversionary tactic. :)

If the OP is so bad, then why can't you falsify it? What exactly is holding you back? The facts, maybe? ;)
Click to expand...

hahahha stammer and dodge all you want. I know why you can't answer. I like watching the squirm. So entertaining for me.
 
AlphaOmega said:
hahahha stammer and dodge all you want. I know why you can't answer. I like watching the squirm. So entertaining for me.
Click to expand...

And now you move to the projection stage of your fail. :lol:

Let me help you by reposting the OP. You tell me which part of it is factually inaccurate:

Phys251 said:
If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos





Once the baby is born, the "prolife" movement picks and chooses which babies' lives matters and which do not.

Immigrants fleeing hellish conditions for a chance at a new life? They don't matter.
Babies born into deep poverty? They don't matter.
Babies in abusive households? They don't matter.
LGBTQs? They don't matter. Especially Ts and Qs.

And so on, and so forth. Have you ever noticed how the people who claim to be devout supporters of the lives of babies are remarkably opposed to any kind of policy that would increase the survivability of babies once they leave the womb? Why this hypocrisy, anti-choicers?
Click to expand...

And what facts you have to refute mine. Go ahead, I'll wait. Failure to even attempt will be taken as your being completely unable to refute the OP. :)
 
Phys251 said:
And now you move to the projection stage of your fail. :lol:

Let me help you by reposting the OP. You tell me which part of it is factually inaccurate:



And what facts you have to refute mine. Go ahead, I'll wait. Failure to even attempt will be taken as your being completely unable to refute the OP. :)
Click to expand...

I don't read past the racist part. It is factually a racist post. But you know this, thats why you refuse to answer my question.
 
Phys251 said:
If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos





Once the baby is born, the "prolife" movement picks and chooses which babies' lives matters and which do not.

Immigrants fleeing hellish conditions for a chance at a new life? They don't matter.
Babies born into deep poverty? They don't matter.
Babies in abusive households? They don't matter.
LGBTQs? They don't matter. Especially Ts and Qs.

And so on, and so forth. Have you ever noticed how the people who claim to be devout supporters of the lives of babies are remarkably opposed to any kind of policy that would increase the survivability of babies once they leave the womb? Why this hypocrisy, anti-choicers?
Click to expand...

godawful humans
 
AlphaOmega said:
I don't read past the racist part. It is factually a racist post.
Click to expand...
There you go again! With no way to refute the OP, you play the "racism" card! :lamo

Far-right racists (not you) love to say that "it's not racist if it's true." Problem is that 99.9999999% of the time they say that, they're saying something that is not even true.

So why can't you just refute the OP and be done with it already? Why do you militantly refuse to refute what you probably know deep down inside is true about it? Maybe you are struggling to accept the OP and you are doing your best to disparage it. If you really think that would work, then I suggest a refresher on your debating skills, because that is no way for you to make an intelligent point. :shrug:

But you know this, thats why you refuse to answer my question.
Click to expand...

I asked my question first. :) You answer my question before I will consider yours. That's how this works.
 
Phys251 said:
There you go again! With no way to refute the OP, you play the "racism" card! :lamo

Far-right racists (not you) love to say that "it's not racist if it's true." Problem is that 99.9999999% of the time they say that, they're saying something that is not even true.

So why can't you just refute the OP and be done with it already? Why do you militantly refuse to refute what you probably know deep down inside is true about it? Maybe you are struggling to accept the OP and you are doing your best to disparage it. If you really think that would work, then I suggest a refresher on your debating skills, because that is no way for you to make an intelligent point. :shrug:



I asked my question first. :) You answer my question before I will consider yours. That's how this works.
Click to expand...

No offense but stop quoting me. I'm only interested in my question getting answered not lefty rants. You are wasting bandwidth. You either have enough education to answer or you don't. Maybe get a friend to help you tackle my thought provoking question.
 
AlphaOmega said:
No offense but stop quoting me.
Click to expand...
:2funny: :2funny:

If you don't want to be quoted then don't say anything! This is pure comedy now!
 
Phys251 said:
Straight to the ad homs I see. Not even trying to make a factual refutation to the facts I posted. :lol:
Click to expand...

It's not an ad hom...you're the biggest race baiter on the forum and your post was full of racial bias. Your opinion thread is dismissed as lacking merit in making any coherent post, because I'm not going to give your bigotry validity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom