• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Voter fraud, again. (1 Viewer)

I can make it easy for you ... look up the Al Franken senatorial election in Minnesota ... you know, the one where the Democrats are proven to have brought more illegal voters to the polls than would be required to overturn the victory.

If you don't like that one, take a look at Illinois during the Kennedy-Nixon election.

If you need others ... just holler.

You can't provide your own sources?
 
You can't provide your own sources?

Nope --- I'm familiar with them ... do your own legwork ... unless, of course, you really don't want to know.

Just google 'franken voter fraud' or 'illinois voter fraud kennedy nixon' .... either will work just fine for you.
 
Nope --- I'm familiar with them ... do your own legwork ... unless, of course, you really don't want to know.

It is not my legwork. It is yours. You make a claim, it is up to you to show evidence for it. Do your own legwork.
 
It is not my legwork. It is yours. You make a claim, it is up to you to show evidence for it. Do your own legwork.

Sorry ... that presumes that I care what you think ... You asked for examples ... I told you where to find them.

I will not make any extraordinary effort to relieve your ignorance. Now, are you intellectually honest enough to explore the possibility that you might not know what you think you know (or, more likely, that the source you have listened to so intently has lied to you), or is lying to yourself (and blaming it on me) the road you are going to take?

It's your decision. But, let me be clear .. I don't care one way or the other.
 
Sorry ... that presumes that I care what you think ... You asked for examples ... I told you where to find them.

I will not make any extraordinary effort to relieve your ignorance. Now, are you intellectually honest enough to explore the possibility that you might not know what you think you know (or, more likely, that the source you have listened to so intently has lied to you), or is lying to yourself (and blaming it on me) the road you are going to take?

It's your decision. But, let me be clear .. I don't care one way or the other.

So you have no examples. Color me surprised...
 
You are intellectually lazy.

No I am not. I pretty much always supply links for any claim I make. I also do a ton of fact checking. nice try, to bad it failed miserably.
 
Isn't it interesting that there dont seem to be any of these cheats that are republican? It should be pretty easy of you to show me some examples in this election, as I have done, right?

We know its one side who is willing to lie, cheat, and steal for its ideology. Deep down you know this.

A poll worker told Obama to vote democrat inside the polling facility that is against the law
 
So you have no examples. Color me surprised...

Oh no!! You misunderstand!!! I do have a GREAT example ... of a liberal who lied ... who doesn't REALLY want to know the truth.

You asked for examples .. I gave them to you .... you want ME to prove it to you. Quit being so lazy, get off your intellectual duff and look them up, prove me wrong.

Then, you can come back here and apologize for your narrow minded position.
 
Oh no!! You misunderstand!!! I do have a GREAT example ... of a liberal who lied ... who doesn't REALLY want to know the truth.

You asked for examples .. I gave them to you .... you want ME to prove it to you. Quit being so lazy, get off your intellectual duff and look them up, prove me wrong.

Then, you can come back here and apologize for your narrow minded position.

You documented nothing. Claims without documentation are worthless. I document my claims, why can't you?
 
You documented nothing. Claims without documentation are worthless. I document my claims, why can't you?

Do you REALLY want me to do your work for you? Are you REALLY too lazy to look it up yourself? When I show it to you, will you publicly admit that the Democrat Party participates in, and condones, voter fraud?
 
Do you REALLY want me to do your work for you? Are you REALLY too lazy to look it up yourself? When I show it to you, will you publicly admit that the Democrat Party participates in, and condones, voter fraud?

It is not my work, I did not make the claim. YOU made the claim, therefore it is on your shoulders to prove the claim.
 
It is not my work, I did not make the claim. YOU made the claim, therefore it is on your shoulders to prove the claim.

Ok, I'll do your work for you ... I'll try to lead you to the water ... but my question is, will you drink? Or, will I just be wasting my time?

BTW -- I made no claim. I stated facts ... you're unwilling to entertain the possibility that those facts might exist.
 
No I am not. I pretty much always supply links for any claim I make. I also do a ton of fact checking. nice try, to bad it failed miserably.

Nope lazy. Nobody feels its worth the effort to provide you with anything and lets be honest-it wouldn't matter anyway.
 
Ok, I'll do your work for you ... I'll try to lead you to the water ... but my question is, will you drink? Or, will I just be wasting my time?

BTW -- I made no claim. I stated facts ... you're unwilling to entertain the possibility that those facts might exist.

We all know the answer to this. He's not really interested, and anything provided will be dismissed.
 
Voter fraud .... let's talk about Franken/Minnesota/2008.

I'm going to point you to the accusations ... it's up to you to prove them wrong.

Al Franken May Have Won His Senate Seat Through Voter Fraud - US News
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com
Felons Voting Illegally May Have Put Franken Over the Top in Minnesota, Study Finds | Fox News
Sen. Al Franken Voter Fraud Revelations Call For Ways To Reduce It - Forbes

Now, just a few references to the debacle in Illinois in 1960 Kennedy v. Nixon election

Chicago ties cast shadow on 1960 presidential win - USATODAY.com
Was Nixon Robbed?
The drama behind President Kennedy

If you want more in-depth information, look it up. I've led you to the water .... now do you have the intellectual credibility to drink?
 
We all know the answer to this. He's not really interested, and anything provided will be dismissed.

We shall see ... his credibility is most assuredly on the line. If he can refute the accusations with facts (rather than opinions), then I'll accept his intellectual credibility. If we get the same old BS (which I fully expect), we'll know what THAT means, too.
 
A poll worker told Obama to vote democrat inside the polling facility that is against the law

Did Obama drop a dime and called his buddy Eric Holder ? Obama took an oath of office to uphold the Constitution and enforce the laws of the land. It is a crime to tell someone how to vote with in so many feet of any polling place.
 
Did Obama drop a dime and called his buddy Eric Holder ? Obama took an oath of office to uphold the Constitution and enforce the laws of the land. It is a crime to tell someone how to vote with in so many feet of any polling place.

The law was openly broken ON CAMERA, in front of POTUS, and its crickets from the media. We know where they stand on these issues.
 
Voter fraud .... let's talk about Franken/Minnesota/2008.

I'm going to point you to the accusations ... it's up to you to prove them wrong.

Al Franken May Have Won His Senate Seat Through Voter Fraud - US News
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com
Felons Voting Illegally May Have Put Franken Over the Top in Minnesota, Study Finds | Fox News
Sen. Al Franken Voter Fraud Revelations Call For Ways To Reduce It - Forbes

Now, just a few references to the debacle in Illinois in 1960 Kennedy v. Nixon election

Chicago ties cast shadow on 1960 presidential win - USATODAY.com
Was Nixon Robbed?
The drama behind President Kennedy

If you want more in-depth information, look it up. I've led you to the water .... now do you have the intellectual credibility to drink?

Thought it was that. This was disproven at the time. Minnesota allows convicted felons to vote after their time served + probation + parole: State Felon Voting Laws - Felon Voting - ProCon.org

Your claim failed at the time, it fails now. More: Pawlenty: felons may have tipped Senate race | kare11.com

We received about 480 names from Minnesota Majority," Ramsey County's lead prosecutor Phil Carruthers told KARE Wednesday, "About 270 were clearly inaccurate and were rejected right from the get-go." He said a quick review revealed the names and birthdates didn't match, or that the felons in question were no longer barred from voting.
"They were ruled out usually because they had the wrong identity of a person," Carruthers explained, "Or because the person no longer was on probation, and thus their civil rights had been restored."
There are 30 felons on the group's list that have been charged with election violations in Ramsey County. But prosecutors had already received those names from the county elections office and the Secretary of State's office, according to Carruthers.
"We've charged about 30 cases so far," he said, "About half of them were people who were felons who just registered but did not actually vote. Election workers flagged those names before they could vote, but it's still a felony for a felon to register."

Well, that was a major fail for you. A;ways good to fact check.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom