The point was that what you said was irrelevant and not worth refuting.
:naughty
Just more asininity.
No Simon, as usual it is you who are spouting foolish and irrelevant nonsense.
What I said was relevant, as It was an on point reply to what the other person thought.
that he knows he is wearing a body mic which would supposedly be capturing the sound of when the taser was employed.
that he knows he is being recorded. (as confirmed by the witness who was recording)
that he knows the taser cartridge fires out many id tags which indicates where it was deployed.
You keep using that word--"clearly."
I do not think it means what you think it means.
:doh
Clearly that would be you, as the evidence
clearly does not allow for a murder charge.
If it were obvious that Slager did not commit murder, then he would not have been charged. If he had been charged anyway, the relevant Policeman Benevolent Associations would be helping Slager. But Slager was charged with murder and the PBAs are not helping him.
On the other side of the fence we have, the local law enforcement, the relevant PBAs, much of the media, and, apparently, most of the posters here.
Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if contrary to your assertion, that most people who have viewed the video decided that it "clearly" was murder.
Given all of these things, your use of the word "clearly" seems to be clearly questionable.
Oy vey! :doh
1. He was not charged.
They jumped the gun and he was arrested without a full and proper investigation.
They didn't even interview the witness who took the video until after the Officer's arrest.
2. Your appeal to authority is nonsense.
3. They clearly did not give the video a proper review. Had they he would not have been arrested for murder.
I am quite willing to concede that you are unable to see how Slager's actions could constitute murder.
There's plenty of evidence to indicate that you are having trouble understanding how a reasonable person could see what Slager did as murder.
You are again speaking foolish nonsense, as this is not about me.
So far you have failed to refute anything that has been presented. Nor could you, which is why you resort to personal nonsense. You have nothing else.
As I already told you.
Stop with the asininity Simon.
This isn't about me.
If you can refute what I present, do so, otherwise save it.
So far, in accordance with the evidence he clearly didn't commit a murder and what he may or may not have believed at the moment does make a difference.
This is an Officer responding to a significant threat to prevent his flight. It is not premeditation or malice aforethought in an attempt kill someone or commit a crime.
Your participation in the "Slager Will Walk" thread should have clued you into what the standard of review is going to be.
This isn't murder, not by a long shot.