- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 123,822
- Reaction score
- 28,050
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Apples and giraffes. And the people who matter (the Black Robes) disagree with you. The relevant precedent was set in 1905 - Jacobson v. Massachusetts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I can't ever figure out how to post links to .pdf files, but an extensive discussion is titled, "Mandatory Vaccinations: Precedent and Current Laws" from the Congressional Research Office, May 21, 2014. Here's a quote from the challenger in Jacobson:
Sounds like many of the arguments made on this thread, which the Supreme Court rejected in favor of the government having the ability to protect the common welfare. I can't imagine any court could find otherwise as it's a core purpose of government and the powers of a police state.
All it would take is a challenge from a family that has a child die from the vaccination. Of course, the medical industry will not diagnose as such and the Pharmacuetical industry will never admit the vaccine might be the cause so having evidence is next to impossible to challenge... it is a multi-billion dollar industry along with a majority population that vaccines work and that want to railroad the rights of a minority population that suffers from vaccinations so nothing will change.