US Army prepared to move Vindman to secure location: report

[apdst]

This would be the lawyer?

This would be Vindman.

 

[Mr. Invisible]

And then there are Democrat supporters.

You do realize that antifa is generally made up, but not exclusively consisting of, anarchists and communists who hate the Democratic Party, correct?

 

[Slartibartfast]

Schiff scrambles to stop whistleblower from being named, after Vindman reveals intel contact | Fox News

So you are implying that the whistle blower would not review such information as a part of their regular duties? This would contradict the whistle blower report...

 

[apdst]

Sorta, but not in the way you mean it. The documents and materials have classified information on it, but without being on a document or material, the law you quote does not apply. Further, discussing the content of the documents and materials is not covered by the law. You picked the wrong law to cite dude.

Alow me to educate you, again:

(c)  In this section[/u[/i], the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.


Please, stop trying to make yourself look important by trying claim that talking about classified information, without proper authorization, is legal.

 

[Superfly]

?????? It shows Vindman thinks there are. Nothing has happened.

:roll:

Nothing ever happens, until it does.

 

[apdst]

So you are implying that the whistle blower would not review such information as a part of their regular duties? This would contradict the whistle blower report...

Vindman wouldn't have had to tell them about it, if that were the case.

The WB wouldn't have said he was passing on second information; he could gotten it himself

 

[Slartibartfast]

Vindman wouldn't have had to tell them about it, if that were the case.

The WB wouldn't have said he was passing on second information; he could gotten it himself

The WB report is a collection of information gather from various people, it says so in the report itself and talking to people about stuff that involves your job is a part of pretty much any job's official duties. That is why people have colleagues.

0 Over the past four months, more than half a dozen U.S. of?cials have informed me of
various facts related to this effort. The information provided herein was relayed to me in
the course of of?cial interagency business. It is routine for U.S. officials with
responsibility for a particular regional or functional portfolio to share such information
with one another in order to inform policymaking and analysis.

Oh it looks like you're wrong again. Per the WB report, this person talked to colleagues (possibly Vindman being one such colleague) about things involving his or her job!

 

[j brown's body]

If he minds his P's & Q's Vindman's got nothing to worry about. Epstein threatened to name Deep State names and that's what caused his sudden suicide.

Qs. I get it.

Epstein was in the custody of William Barr.

 

[Redress]

Alow me to educate you, again:

(c)  In this section[/u[/i], the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.


Please, stop trying to make yourself look important by trying claim that talking about classified information, without proper authorization, is legal.

You probably should not try and educate people on stuff you are not educated on. Go, read the first paragraph. It states what the code does. All you are quoting is definitions.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Lol, if you think Antifa members are Democrats then you demonstrate a clear lack of understanding of left-wing ideologies. The VAST majority of Antifa members are anarchists/socialists/communists. Perhaps a few would vote Democrat as the 'less of evils' but would never actually call themselves Democrats.

Never.

Antifa specifically view Democrats and pretty much all liberals as traitors, specifically as "neoliberal traitors" and specifically as "statist traitors".

 

[Geoist]

Never.

Antifa specifically view Democrats and pretty much all liberals as traitors, specifically as "neoliberal traitors" and specifically as "statist traitors".

I left the possibility open to 'perhaps a few.' Not going to try and paint all Antifa with a broad brush. I know a few anarchists who actually do vote. But yes, Antifa does view the Democratic Party as neoliberal traitors.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

If he minds his P's & Q's Vindman's got nothing to worry about. Epstein threatened to name Deep State names and that's what caused his sudden suicide.

If Vindman has anything to worry about, that is legally actionable, and since we're talking about possible attempts on his life, it would be seen as attempted assassination of the Director for European Affairs for the United States National Security Council (NSC)

Pretty sure that anyone convicted of such an offense would wind up at Leavenworth, possibly with the death penalty.

Vindman is not under any demand to "mind his P's and Q's" and I take objection to your description of a Purple Heart combat veteran and distinguished member of an executive body that includes the Vice President (statutory), the Secretary of State (statutory), the Secretary of Defense (statutory), the Secretary of Energy (statutory), the National Security Advisor (non-statutory), the Attorney General (non-statutory), the Secretary of Homeland Security (non-statutory), the Representative of the United States to the United Nations (non-statutory), and the Secretary of the Treasury (non-statutory)...as being subject to the whims of an uninformed and infantile teenager who knows little or nothing about diplomatic statecraft.

And your "deep state" nonsense is pure Alex Jones conspiracy theory.

What are you even doing here?
You should be writing a manifesto.
Q will be grading it.

PS: Does Bill Barr have to mind his P's and Q's or is he absolved of anything to do with Epstein's death?

 

[apdst]

The WB report is a collection of information gather from various people, it says so in the report itself and talking to people about stuff that involves your job is a part of pretty much any job's official duties. That is why people have colleagues.



Oh it looks like you're wrong again. Per the WB report, this person talked to colleagues (possibly Vindman being one such colleague) about things involving his or her job!

That doesn't prove me wrong.

 

[apdst]

You probably should not try and educate people on stuff you are not educated on. Go, read the first paragraph. It states what the code does. All you are quoting is definitions.

Exactly! :lamo

 

[Rogue Valley]

Violation of 18USC1924: the unauthorized communication of classified material..

Everyone that Lt. Col. Vindman talked to on July 25 has a high security clearance.

 

[Slartibartfast]

That doesn't prove me wrong.

The whistle blower cited that knowing this stuff is part of their official duties. Your assertion is that Vindland possibly broke the law by telling the WB. The WB's claims were checked and vetted and if the law was broken, it would have not gotten this far and the WB would have been in trouble for knowing classified information inappropriately or their sources would be in trouble for the same (or both)

That proves you wrong.

 

[Port & Starboard]

US Army prepared to move Vindman to secure location: report | TheHill

The U.S. Army is ready to move Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and his family to a secure location on a military base if they are found to be in danger due to his testimony in the House impeachment inquiry into President Trump, U.S. officials told The Wall Street Journal.

Vindman reportedly requested a security assessment to analyze his and his family’s physical and online security, which was completed in recent weeks, according to the Journal.
=========================================
It's a hell of a country we live in when we have to plan to assure the safety of witnesses against Presidential crimes. There are apparently enough pro-Trump nuts out there with guns & an agenda that make this a serious question.

What crimes Jack?

The last political nut shot up a republican softball practice...........remember that Jack?

You are so full of it.

 

[Rogue Valley]

What crimes Jack?

I just posted one this morning.

New York man pleads guilty to threatening to kill Rep. Ilhan Omar

 

[d0gbreath]

A reminder too that when Trump falls there will be blood. Crazies will take it upon themselves to avenge the loss of white nationalist pride and the egg of the face of their cult leader.

As I've said before, there'll be no second civil war or general uprising. But the usual craziness will see an uptick: rednecks will attack people of color, mosques and synagogues will be shot up, firebombed or otherwise defaced; incels will target schools, malls and yoga studios; red-blooded males across the nation will beat their wives black and blue. And yes, some of the more talented ones will try to target public figures who they feel have wronged the movement. There will be blood as they struggle with their impotent rage.

I don't see them as particularly threatening.

 

[d0gbreath]

And then there are Democrat supporters.

Thanks for the promo Bro!

 

[Redress]

Exactly! :lamo

Definitions are not what a law or code does. That is contained in the first paragraph. What 18 U.S. Code § 1924 does it make it a crime to take classified documents or materials with the intent to keep them. Like I said, you picked the wrong law.

 

[Vern]

And then there are Democrat supporters.

"American", your pathological obedience to trump really makes me ill. Its because of people like you I know democracy wont last another generation in this country. Read this slowly, your conservative masters are attacking someone for telling the truth and he now has to be concerned for his and his family's safety because of people like you.

 

[apdst]

Definitions are not what a law or code does. That is contained in the first paragraph. What 18 U.S. Code § 1924 does it make it a crime to take classified documents or materials with the intent to keep them. Like I said, you picked the wrong law.

I posted the definitions that are part of the code. :lamo

 

[Redress]

I posted the definitions that are part of the code. :lamo

If a law about emissions standards includes a definition of what an automobile is, it does not make automobiles illegal. You should read 18 U.S. Code § 1924 and see what it actually does.

 

[apdst]

I just posted one this morning.

New York man pleads guilty to threatening to kill Rep. Ilhan Omar

Trump threatened to kill Omar?