• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ukraine Court Reveals Officials Interfered in US Election by Naming Manafort

SLC

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
10,048
Reaction score
3,321
Location
Southlake, Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Ukraine Court Reveals Officials Interfered in US Election by Naming Manafort - Sputnik International

A Ukrainian court revealed Wednesday that two Ukrainian officials had violated the law by revealing information about illegal cash payments made to Paul Manafort, Donald Trump’s former presidential election campaign chair. The disclosure amounted to interference in a foreign election.

Kiev district court ruled Wednesday that Artem Sytnik, director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, and member of parliament Serhiy Leshchenko acted illegally when they disclosed Manafort's name from among the documents of ousted President Viktor Yanukovych's Party of Regions, the Kyiv Post reported. By doing so, they acted in favor of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election.



In response to the ruling, Leshchenko wrote on Facebook that the judge's decision was an attempt to excuse removing Sytnik from office, the Post reported.

Radio Sputnik's Loud and Clear spoke with Mark Sleboda, an international affairs expert and security analyst, about the case.

Sleboda said the revelation was "just the tip of the [Alexandra] Chalupa iceberg of Ukrainian interference in the US election and of collusion between the West-backed Ukrainian putsch regime and the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign, and there's a long history there."

...

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

It seems that the DNC was colluding with the Ukraine in the 2016 election to sway the election against Donald Trump. That is from a recent court case ruling in Ukraine. This is just the tip of the iceberg. There is much more that is about to come out on this subject. Hmm collusion with a foreign country to try to win the US Presidential election. Where have we hear that before. .
 
What convenient timing.
 
Ukraine Court Reveals Officials Interfered in US Election by Naming Manafort - Sputnik International



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

It seems that the DNC was colluding with the Ukraine in the 2016 election to sway the election against Donald Trump. That is from a recent court case ruling in Ukraine. This is just the tip of the iceberg. There is much more that is about to come out on this subject. Hmm collusion with a foreign country to try to win the US Presidential election. Where have we hear that before. .

Sputnik News article? Are you ****ing kidding?

“According to The New York Times Sputnik engages in deliberate disinformation,[4] and has often been described as a Russian propaganda outlet.[5][6][7] Sputnik employees run social media pages and blogs posing as citizens of various countries, and purchased paid advertisement to disseminate fake and misleading content according to CNN Business.[8]” - Wikipedia

Sputnik (news agency) - Wikipedia

SLC, you are a complete bonehead.
 
Sputnik News article? Are you ****ing kidding?

As opposed to what? The fantasies of virtually every "reputable" news organization that claimed Trump colluded with the Russians to fix the 2016 Presidential Election? Sadly, Sputnik is more reputable these days than CNN. :(
 
Sputnik News article? Are you ****ing kidding?

“According to The New York Times Sputnik engages in deliberate disinformation,[4] and has often been described as a Russian propaganda outlet.[5][6][7] Sputnik employees run social media pages and blogs posing as citizens of various countries, and purchased paid advertisement to disseminate fake and misleading content according to CNN Business.[8]” - Wikipedia

Sputnik (news agency) - Wikipedia

SLC, you are a complete bonehead.
You are relying on FAKE NEWS CNN? Aren't they the ones would pushed the whole Trump colluded with Russia narrative? Weren't they the one that had imminent indictments against Trumps family. Isn't CNN the Fake News outlet that had to fire three of their reporters for fake news about Russian investment funds with ties to Trump officals? Why yes I think they were the ones.

Ukraine Courts have found the Ukraine National Anti-Corruption Bureau illegally released information on Paul Manafort to damage the Trump campaign and that, Maui Wowie, is a FACT. Sputnik news has offices in dozens of countries. And they are at least as reliable as CNN . You will see more on this subject in The Hill soon.
 
Last edited:
Sputnik News article? Are you ****ing kidding?

“According to The New York Times Sputnik engages in deliberate disinformation,[4] and has often been described as a Russian propaganda outlet.[5][6][7] Sputnik employees run social media pages and blogs posing as citizens of various countries, and purchased paid advertisement to disseminate fake and misleading content according to CNN Business.[8]” - Wikipedia

Sputnik (news agency) - Wikipedia

SLC, you are a complete bonehead.

What I want to know is how Sputnik is considered mainstream media.
 
As opposed to what? The fantasies of virtually every "reputable" news organization that claimed Trump colluded with the Russians to fix the 2016 Presidential Election? Sadly, Sputnik is more reputable these days than CNN. :(
Sadly a lot of our news outlets like the Washington Post, NY Times,, CNN, and MSNBC and others are nothing more than the propaganda arm of the Democrat party. They are no different than Sputnik news. This story about the Kiev court case ruling that Ukraine officials interfered on behave of Hillary is true. Remember when the NY Times and others reported on Manafort's finances and he had to resign as Trump]s campaign manager? The got the information from Ukraine officials who were trying to influence the election for Hillary.

Has anyone noticed the huge decrease in CNN's and MSNBC's audience since Barr's letter stating Mueller found no evidence of Russian Collusion by anyone in the Trump campaign? :lol:.
 
What I want to know is how Sputnik is considered mainstream media.

In was wondering the same thing about CNN and MSNBC. They have been lying to you for at least the two last years.
 
What I want to know is how Sputnik is considered mainstream media.

It isn’t. That’s why he’s a bonehead, along with the ridiculousness of his post.
 
You are relying on FAKE NEWS CNN? Aren't they the ones would pushed the whole Trump colluded with Russia narrative? Weren't they the one that had imminent indictments against Trumps family. Isn't CNN the Fake News outlet that had to fire three of their reporters for fake news about Russian investment funds with ties to Trump officals? Why yes I think they were the ones.

Ukraine Courts have found the Ukraine National Anti-Corruption Bureau illegally released information on Paul Manafort to damage the Trump campaign and that, Maui Wowie, is a FACT. Sputnik news has offices in dozens of countries. And they are at least as reliable as CNN . You will see more on this subject in The Hill soon.

You believe the stangest stuff! You’re a ****ing loon.
 
You believe the stangest stuff! You’re a ****ing loon.

No worse than the cockamaimy bull the left has been pedaling for two years. Bet you still believe.
 
No worse than the cockamaimy bull the left has been pedaling for two years. Bet you still believe.

You’re right—you are “Out there”, Mr. PoppyCock. Your name describes you well.
 
Me personally? I am not the topic, try to focus. Focus

You think mainstream news is fake and Russian propaganda is real news. That is nonsense:

pop·py·****
/ˈpäpēˌkäk/
nounINFORMAL
nonsense.
 
You think mainstream news is fake and Russian propaganda is real news. That is nonsense:

pop·py·****
/ˈpäpēˌkäk/
nounINFORMAL
nonsense.

You think "Russian Collusion" is real.

de·lu·sion·al
[dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl]

ADJECTIVE
characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder.
"hospitalization for schizophrenia and delusional paranoia" · [more]
based on or having faulty judgment; mistaken.
"their delusional belief in the project's merits never wavers" · [more]
 
You think "Russian Collusion" is real.

de·lu·sion·al
[dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl]

ADJECTIVE
characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder.
"hospitalization for schizophrenia and delusional paranoia" · [more]
based on or having faulty judgment; mistaken.
"their delusional belief in the project's merits never wavers" · [more]

Why are you talking about Russian collusion? Are you upset about something?
 
You are relying on FAKE NEWS CNN? Aren't they the ones would pushed the whole Trump colluded with Russia narrative? Weren't they the one that had imminent indictments against Trumps family. Isn't CNN the Fake News outlet that had to fire three of their reporters for fake news about Russian investment funds with ties to Trump officals? Why yes I think they were the ones.

Ukraine Courts have found the Ukraine National Anti-Corruption Bureau illegally released information on Paul Manafort to damage the Trump campaign and that, Maui Wowie, is a FACT. Sputnik news has offices in dozens of countries. And they are at least as reliable as CNN . You will see more on this subject in The Hill soon.

CNN is mainstream news. Sputnik News is not.
 
Sadly a lot of our news outlets like the Washington Post, NY Times,, CNN, and MSNBC and others are nothing more than the propaganda arm of the Democrat party. They are no different than Sputnik news. This story about the Kiev court case ruling that Ukraine officials interfered on behave of Hillary is true. Remember when the NY Times and others reported on Manafort's finances and he had to resign as Trump]s campaign manager? The got the information from Ukraine officials who were trying to influence the election for Hillary.

Has anyone noticed the huge decrease in CNN's and MSNBC's audience since Barr's letter stating Mueller found no evidence of Russian Collusion by anyone in the Trump campaign? :lol:.

NO...simply NO

Reject ANYTHING coming from Sputnik or RT or any Russian propaganda. ENOUGH of that.

We know Russia has used that and is using that to influence our elections and politics.

NO
 
Sputnik News article? Are you ****ing kidding?

“According to The New York Times Sputnik engages in deliberate disinformation,[4] and has often been described as a Russian propaganda outlet.[5][6][7] Sputnik employees run social media pages and blogs posing as citizens of various countries, and purchased paid advertisement to disseminate fake and misleading content according to CNN Business.[8]” - Wikipedia

Sputnik (news agency) - Wikipedia

SLC, you are a complete bonehead.
Are you claiming that they did not convict the 2 guys for the crimes claimed in the article?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
 
It isn’t. That’s why he’s a bonehead, along with the ridiculousness of his post.

CNN is reaching less than a million people a day now. They have been lying to you and everyone else for at least two years. NBC's head of their political division for NBC/MSNBC is accused of bulling a reporter at the BEHEST of the DNC. And you consider these propagandists MSM I guess you are just selective who you want propaganda from.

The reporter called the DNC to verify his scoop the DNC asked him to hold off on his story and he declined. The next thing he knew Dana Linzer the head of political news for NBC/MSNBC called him and tried to bully him into holding the story. That is the "quality" of the news you consider MSM. :roll:
 
NO...simply NO

Reject ANYTHING coming from Sputnik or RT or any Russian propaganda. ENOUGH of that.

We know Russia has used that and is using that to influence our elections and politics.

NO
And we know the left wing media is working to influence elections here, Also Obama interfered in Israel's election. And Obama KNEW the Russian's were meddling in our election but CHOOSE to do nothing.
 
Why are you talking about Russian collusion? Are you upset about something?

You AREN'T upset that an American President was falsely accused of Russian Collusion? You should be.
 
CNN is mainstream news. Sputnik News is not.
Pfff CNN is reaching less than one million viewers. CNN LIED TO YOU for two year. They are just propagandist. You cannot trust them they aren't MSM anymore. If you watch them you need to balance it out with an alternative viewpoint.

PS I watch CNN regularly just to see what the other side is saying. CNN has been lying to you because it was good for rating....until their lies were discovered.
 
And we know the left wing media is working to influence elections here, Also Obama interfered in Israel's election. And Obama KNEW the Russian's were meddling in our election but CHOOSE to do nothing.

If the choice is (and it's not) between Russian agit prop (agitation propaganda) and main stream media

If you're an American who loves his country and choose Russian agitprop...well you make Putin smile.

That's on you
 
And if you're pushing Russian agitprop...you're either a Russian troll or you might as well be
 
Back
Top Bottom