Yeah.....hopefully you will figure that part about those still serving in such a position and being able to trust in their Government. So that the Direct and personal incompetency does not Ever take place again. As well as those managerial failures leading to Consequences. Also so that Democrats understand those Big Warning Signs that they refused to accept as such. Like prior attacks upon the Same Consulate and the Attempts to kill other Ambassadors. Such as the Brits and Italians.
As well as the Attack being in direct correlation with the Anniversary of 911 and 23 Muslim Countries Rising up due to a Sunni Cleric in Egypt using Social media.
That would be those common sense warnings that Team Obama refused to acknowledge.
Course then figuring out what actually took place and that why after 8 months the investigation still hasn't brought anyone to Justice. Which was what Obama promised to do. Back then when the attack occurred and then just the other day. After he said he didn't know about any Whistleblowers. Or that people that were survivors wanted to testify.
So, essentially what you're saying is Rep. Issa's on a witch hunt.
Look, while I can appreciate the search for truth here (i.e., who did or DIDN'T do what and why?), I don't think the answers that ultimately come from these continued inquiries will yield any more information than that which we already know. So, what do we know?
- Congress didn't appropriate sufficient funds to station U.S. security forces at our embassies abroad, specifically in troubled "hot spots" like Libya.
- Request by low ranking State Dept. personnel for increased security were denied, ignored or otherwise downplayed.
- The attack on the Libyan Embassy were falsely blamed on a spontaneous uprising initiated by an anti-Islamic video.
- 4 Americans died as a result of inadequate security forces at the Libyan Embassy.
- No contingency force was deployed on-station in sufficient force levels to push back against the uprising.
- The Obama Administration's "response-time" by most accounts was inadequate or non-existent to tackle the uprising.
I don't disagree with the majority viewpoint that mistakes were made all around (and I haven't even touched on the errors made by the CIA or the Defense Dept), but if folks are looking for something impeachable to hang around this President's neck over the Benghazi raid, I'd say you're barking up the wrong tree. It's highly unlikely any concrete evidence will be found that points to ineptness by this President over Benghazi. If anything, the majority of the blame rests with State, Defense and intel (CIA). Other than changing the talking points (which I believe weren't changed by WH officials if I've read recent articles concerning the matter correctly), there's really nothing that points directly to him.